« first day (530 days earlier)      last day (4807 days later) » 

20:00
It's still "good subjective" as someone can cite all the reasons they used to arrive at their conclusion
Good subjective: The game had a lot of cutscenes with tits in them.
@NickT Not with any kind of validity to a broad audience.
Now, even though @GnomeSlice is taking a step back, asking for just the reasons, you're harping that it would be too subjective.
Reason: I watched the cutscenes. They had tits in them.
@GnomeSlice "A lot" to you might be 1.
"A lot" to someone else might start after the 100th.
20:01
@ArdaXi What? If someone gives the evidence they use to support their conclusion, that is perfectly fine so someone else can draw their own.
@ArdaXi Well, that's a bad answer then.
"More than half of the cutscenes had tits in them"
Whatever, I'm not going to give figures because I've never played the game
@GnomeSlice Might be a lot to you, not to someone else.
@ArdaXi then someone could simply enumerate how many times they saw whatever.
Sheesh.
@NickT And enumerate what, exactly?
20:02
@ArdaXi Correct. Which is why the question isn't 'is the game offensive'
I mean, sure, blatant sexual content is obvious.
How I interpret the given information is entirely subjective, but that doesn't mean the question is.
@ArdaXi, your argument is steadily getting worse as you try to pigeonhole Gnomeslice's question as totally subjective when there is an objective core in it
@GnomeSlice What information is given is subjective.
@ArdaXi ...How?
20:03
1
Q: I hate hats, so why do I see them everywhere?

casperOneI hate hats. Fortunately, I was asked this on the front page of gaming so I didn't have to be bothered with it. However, if I hate hats (not dislike, not mildly annoyed by the presence), then why am I being notified if I get one? I also see them on the Gravatar on a person's profile page: ...

@NickT If you show me I'm wrong, I'm willing to adapt my views. If you tell me I'm wrong, I stop listening to you.
@NickT I appreciate the defense, but I'm going to delete it anyway I think.
@GnomeSlice What about subtler things, like that woman who gave marks to men.
That can be interpreted as sexist. I wouldn't.
@ArdaXi marks?
I'm not asking for whether or not someone thinks it's sexist.
@GnomeSlice Yeah, to guys she'd slept with IIRC.
@GnomeSlice Well, you are.
If someone thinks it's sexist, they'll put it in their answer.
20:04
@ArdaXi you are constantly jumping on every single thing in these candidate answers that could possibly have some sort of ambiguity.
If someone thinks it isn't, they won't include it.
@NickT What else am I supposed to do if I'm trying to defend its closing?
@ArdaXi I've specifically asked for it in the question.
I haven't just asked for 'things that may be sexist'.
I'm asking what the general behaviours, situations, character interactions etc are like.
@ArdaXi answers shouldn't have to be overly rigid, they sound awful.
@GnomeSlice So you're basically asking for a list of every piece of clothing, every bit of dialogue, etc in the game?
Language has ambiguity, it's not math.
@ArdaXi that's what you're asking for
20:06
0
Q: As a dual wield tank, is it more effective to specialize blacksmithing or enchanting?

Emanueleas per subject I'm trying to play a proper tank character, but perks are indeed limited. The plan is to go dual wield, thus specializing in Two Handed indeed, Heavy Armor, a bit of Block and then I'm undecided between Blacksmithing and/or Enchanting. Would I be more effective with enchantments o...

0
Q: How do you counter Tiny?

yx.There has been two games now, one with Tiny on my team and one on the opposing team where he has taken over the game. In both games, he was the sole person in the middle lane and proceeded to gank and become unstoppable really fast by feasting on opposing squishies. His avalanche + throw combo ...

0
Q: Where is the second SAM site in Battlefield 3?

JitamaroI'm stuck in Battlefield 3 where you start as a co-pilot and need to destroy some sam site at an airplane. I can't locate the second sam site and there is too much cloud and I can't see the ground. Is there a map or so? How can I destroy the second sam site?

0
Q: Do the Let's Help mini-games unlock anything?

Ashley NunnI have unlocked a few different Let's Help! mini-games, and while some of them are fun, I am not sure if there is an actual point to playing them (other than getting high-scores). Do they unlock anything? Does getting a certain score matter? (I know in Crafting Mama, you got medals for getting ...

@NickT That's why we should all learn lojban.
@NickT No, that's the only way I can objectively interpret his answer.
I'm open to other interpretations.
Which is extremely onerous and impractical, but it is perfectly conceivable that someone could summarize it and offer an argument either way
@NickT Offering an argument is not subjective?
@ArdaXi are you contending that any, any, subjectivity on this site is bad?
20:08
@NickT No, although that is, within reason, my personal view.
You don't, but it is your view...clarify
@NickT I'm not arguing my own views, I'm arguing the site's policies as I understand them.
The site's policy is "Good Subjective, Bad Subjective", which offers lots of leeway for subjective questions so long as they follow some guidelines
@NickT And I do not agree that this question falls under them.
Based on which points
20:09
I just don't see this question falling under "Good Subjective".
Well, I think it's a pretty bad policy all around, because it focuses far too much on the answers, not the questions.
If the question is phrased to invite good subjective answers, then it's a good question
@NickT Yes. In what way does this question invite good answers? Answers that are impartial, for example?
@ArdaXi wait, what do you mean, the article focuses exclusively on questions
"Guidelines for Great Subjective Questions"
Great subjective questions inspire answers that explain “why” and “how”
Great subjective questions tend to have long, not short, answers.
@NickT Great Subjective Questions invite answers that, inspire answers which, tend to have answers that.
20:12
I also agree that judging questions based on their answers is a problem.
Sorry, I meant the points focus on questions
But that's not what we're discussing now.
We're discussing how to interpret the already-standing guidelines.
@ArdaXi In any case, the guidelines focus on questions, which of them don't apply to the question in question?
Personally, I don't really feel like arguing in favour of policies I don't agree with, right now. I think the question should stay closed for the reasons I've provided before.
If you disagree, I suggest you open a meta topic.
You're the one that disagrees with the status quo
20:15
@NickT Enough people thought it was subjective that they closed it.
@StrixVaria that would be two people
@NickT The question is closed. The status quo is that it should be.
Has anyone bought off of Amazon games before? ... Is it a client or a one off download?
You happen to be the one disagreeing with it.
@NickT Which means a mod closed it.
If a mod closes a question before it gets 4 other votes, that's a display that they are extra confident that it is close-worthy.
20:17
So we can't argue with mods?
Mods are infallible?
We can.
@ArdaXi Have you never seen the word 'general' before?
But let's not blame @ArdaXi for everything.
Whoever closed it should step in and explain.
@NickT No, but their vote carries more weight.
Why question are we talking about?
20:18
@WilliamHilsum Pardon?
-1
Q: What is this game's attitude toward women?

GnomeSliceSo a game caught my eye recently when I was doing some online shopping. The game is called King's Bounty: Armored Princess. The reason it caught my eye is unimportant, you jerk. What I really want to know about is how that cover reflects on the actual game itself. I'm not familiar with th...

@WilliamHilsum Amazon has a download-delivery thing for games?
@WilliamHilsum What are you looking for?
2
Q: I hate hats, so why do I see them everywhere?

casperOneI hate hats. Fortunately, I was asked this on the front page of gaming so I didn't have to be bothered with it. However, if I hate hats (not dislike, not mildly annoyed by the presence), then why am I being notified if I get one? I also see them on the Gravatar on a person's profile page: ...

HEY I'M IN A QUESTION.
I still don't understand Arda's "debate" style, trying to break things down to some elemental level (the English language) and still declaring that they're subjective. It seems absurd
@GraceNote It seams they are countering Steam Sales... For the sake of a tiny bit extra, I really like steam now and was just wondering if Amazon is just a one off download or if they give a full download - pardon the link, it is long/can't see if they have embedded a tracking/affiliate link - amazon.com/gp/feature.html/…
20:21
@GnomeSlice A fascist troll question about someone who hates hats.
@WilliamHilsum Huh, I wasn't aware Amazon did digital distribution.
I unfortunately had to disable hats because the pages took 15 seconds to load with hats.
But I don't hate hats.
I felt bad clicking "I hate hats."
@WilliamHilsum Have you ever operated a Kindle?
I agree with @NickT's comment, you can't state whether the game is offensive, but you can say how graphic the game is.
Sequence is €.99, I guess there's really very little to lose now
20:23
Buying games is all about it not being a loss at all.
@GraceNote not yet! ... Until they have a colour one (not including Fire in that!) I won't
@GraceNote Well, worst case scenario analysis.
I think the title makes the question seem subjective, I should edit it.
Does anyone here use a Kindle and can confirm whether books you buy for it are tied to an Amazon account or otherwise?
@GraceNote I don't think so.
But I can't say for sure. I know other e-readers don't do that.
20:25
@GraceNote I think they are but let me ask my kindle-wielding friend.
I thought the books were in azw format or whatever, so it was kinda moot
@WilliamHilsum I see. My assumption is basically figuring, "Whatever policies they have for digital books on Kindle, will match the policies that are in place for your access to digital game downloads".
@GraceNote bit of a jump imho
@NickT I quantify concepts in order to make them less abstract. If I make an error in doing so, feel free to point it out, but if I don't, there's no reason to mention it.
@GraceNote So... Sucky!?
20:26
@ArdaXi How less abstract?
@NickT It is a bit of a jump but that's still how I figure it. Seems odd if it were otherwise.
@NickT As little as possible.
possible for whom?
@WilliamHilsum I don't know, I haven't actually gotten anything for my Kindle on account of trading away my literacy level for a candy cane last night.
@GraceNote Should I delete my question?
20:27
@NickT Just as far as is logically warranted.
@ArdaXi how far is it warranted in different circumstances? It may differ between people as well
@GnomeSlice If you just want to definitively end the discussion here, you may.
@NickT Like I said, if you see an individual flaw with it, feel free to point it out.
I've been wrong before, I've no qualms with it.
However, if you just tell me (even indirectly) that I'm wrong without telling me why, I reserve the right to be offended.
Otherwise, I don't see much of a benefit to pre-mature deletion if you do not agree with the closure.
You reduce everything to absurd levels (language) when that just distracts from the higher level concepts
20:30
I think that title is less subjective now. It's now not asking what it portrays, instead what is shown.
@NickT If not even the language is clear, you can't debate the higher level concepts.
In case you missed my new tumblr: http://programmerryangosling.tumblr.com
This is not math, we don't need formal lemmas for every word, phrase, and concept
@NickT You said absurd in that sentence, you're calling Arda absurd!
@NickT You do when there's disagreement on the meaning.
20:32
you're absurd
Exactly. Disagreement warrants explanation, no matter how 'absurd'.
If someone disagrees with you over language, then that definition isn't as clear-cut as you thought.
Saying that the question should be closed because someone could answer with the cloudy noun "a lot" is ridiculous.
That's not even a fault with the question
@NickT Someone used that "a lot" to attack a claim of subjectivity.
I wasn't saying the question should be closed because of that, I was merely saying the argument was invalid because "a lot" is subjective.
The annoying thing about arguments is that the whole thing falls apart if even a tiny bit of it is wrong and you have to start from scratch.
So Arda picks apart the minutiae of the argument.
Does that sound about right?
Ok, you don't seem to be arguing either a) using the current GSBS policy or b) against the GSBS policy, just using your own "internal policy" against a specific question which comes across as fairly ad hominem against Gnomeslice
20:36
@NickT I'm done with you.
I'm not going to stand for all your snarky remarks without any basis.
pokes steam to adjust reception
what am I wrong on
If you can't justify what I perceive as some pretty serious insults, I'm not going to talk to you.
@GraceNote I thought my opinion didn't weight as much as the community's.
@GnomeSlice Last I checked, you're a part of the community.
20:38
I realize that "beat up on GnomeSlice" is a fairly easy and rewarding sport... :P
@NickT I'm not using my own internal policy, I'm using the site's policy as I understand it. This might be completely wrong, and I'm open to corrections. A correction is not "you're wrong because I say so."
@Gnome Your opinion weights exactly the same as each individual part of the community so it's decided on numbers.
You're doing that a lot, and it comes across as very immature.
@ArdaXi I asked for clarification as to how you were interpreting GSBS to exclude the question, you gave no response
@NickT no star fishing in the middle of a debate!
20:39
Could we not say this is beating up on GnomeSlice, please?
@NickT Because I was trying to end the argument, it was going nowhere.
@RonanForman Sure, but since when does most of the community agree with me?
@GraceNote Sorry, was that non-PC? ;)
@GnomeSlice Disagreement doesn't render your opinion invalid.
@GraceNote It does if it's based on numbers... Isn't that what he just said?
20:40
@ArdaXi no, I was trying to direct it back towards the question vs. policy, not a dissection of the question in a vacuum
@GnomeSlice You're making assumptions on actual levels of support.
@NickT No, it's just that the last time what was an argument on subject matters and verbiage was interpretted as an attack on the individual, it got a little spicy and I'd really like to avoid that being asserted again.
@Gnome Valid and supported are two separate things.
@NickT Look, as I said, if you disagree with the closure, post a meta topic.
All I ask is that you cease the petty baseless remarks about me personally, because it's starting to get on my nerves.
@GnomeSlice The point of having a viewpoint is not necessarily that you need to start off with the most support. There's always the method of rallying support through the strength of the viewpoint.
@ArdaXi and ask the exact same question?
20:42
@NickT The idea of a meta topic is to gain consensus on a topic.
I could just canvass for one more open-vote
We would be able to vote on answers to a meta topic.
Then what, the onus would be on you?
I'll cast my close vote, that's all.
@badp yes. Bit.Trip Core is pretty awesome.
20:44
@RavenDreamer What version have you played?
@badp I have Saga.
@GraceNote No I wasn't, but that's what it sounds like everyone else thinks.
(I don't doubt it's awesome. I've watched the shit out of it on YT)
@GnomeSlice You currently have 4 reopen votes on your question, in a system where 5 votes is deemed to cause action.
@GnomeSlice That's what you sound like, frankly.
20:45
And, oddly enough, there's no "options" menu in the game, anywhere. Which is sad, because I'd like to adjust sensitivity / difficulty
@GraceNote Oh really, it's gone up?
Oh, difficulty controls have been added to the other games?
One of those is from me.
@NickT You pinged me with, "And what if you're not online?"
I know the original Beat didn't have a difficulty slider
20:45
What on Earth were you talking about?
same for Runner IIRC
@GnomeSlice Aye, it's at 4.
@badp Ah, well maybe the PC versions spoiled me.
Actually is the difficulty system in Beat still broken?
I've noticed easy mode was nerfed heavily in the iPad version
@RavenDreamer I hope it was one ping only
20:47
14 hours ago, by Nick T
@RavenDreamer and if we're not on at the same time?
basically, if you can play decently, you'll score roughly twice as much in Easy than in Normal mode on Windows
... If anyone has a second (and Excel) Can you check over my spreadsheet, I think there is an easy mistake, but, I have a headache and can't work this out... trying to see if better value is on Steam USD or GBP :/ williamhilsum.com/steam.xls ... Or maybe I am correct and there is only the one that is cheaper this time...
multiplier starts halved (×50) but grows twice as fast (gain one every 8 after 40 instead of one every 16 after 80)
Plus, you may like this/want it yourself!
@WilliamHilsum "The page cannot be found"
20:48
Don't forget the Gamersgate bundle pack.
It has the first three games for $12 something
@RavenDreamer the meta post served my purposes well though
0
Q: Why is this a duplicate?

JoeWhy is this question a dupliate of this? I'm not asking if the attack is weaker, but if the animation is slower. Seems different to me.

@NickT Ah. Some context might have helped.
@GnomeSlice Really? Why did you add those tags back in?
? Really?
@StrixVaria ? I don't know, that was just now. I didn't add the other one.
20:50
The edit shows you just added it in.
@StrixVaria No, it was already there...
Weird.
In any case, sounds like one of those meta-tags we're trying to get rid of. So adding it in is probably going to result in imminent burnination.
But I won't lead the campaign against that one.
It's not especially egregious.
, though...
Yeah, I don't like it, not sure who added it there.
1
Q: Where do I find dragons breath?

norlando02My friend had a shout called Dragons Breath. It did a lot of fire damage. I was wondering where do I find it?

Might have been @Ullallulloo.
20:51
That may have been me by accident, when I edited the title I may have also accidentally rolled back.
I've already removed both of those tags from this question. Please don't add them back. Particularly
@RonanForman You also made my title much more subjective.
I'm going to edit it again, now, and I'd like nobody else to mess with it, for now.
Can a mod trim the comments off of this answer? All the requests I've gotten have been fulfilled, so now they're just noise. Leave the first comment (from Tobias), though, since it's still relevant.
Has anyone here played Worms: Ultimate Mayhem?
@DaveMcClelland done.
20:55
@RavenDreamer Thanks!
@GnomeSlice my edits fine?
Oh my god, awesome indie bundle for $20.
SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I dunno, I think the question would get a lot less flak if you removed the picture; that probably drives a lot of knee-jerk voting
It was showing that title for me already? :S
@NickT Then those people need to grow up.
What's Jamestown: Legend of the Lost Colony?
@GnomeSlice An awesome bullet hell shoot-em-up.
20:59
Yeah, but I have the feeling that just seeing that will cause people to argue against it just 'cuz
It was in the most recent indie bundle.
Is it a sequel to Jamestown?

« first day (530 days earlier)      last day (4807 days later) »