whereas I have a bunch of rules in my head about what close-worthy and delete-worthy questions are not worth spending my votes on because there are almost always more egregious ones later in the queues
one of the stranger custom close reasons we've used recently:
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it involves watching a video, reproducing the issue on one's own device, and debugging the resulting crash (if available) for a product that I don't have the source for. — MichaelT1 hour ago
> I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this looks like it's just someone's pet theory, without having been restricted to specific franchise. Yes, there may be some fantasy story somewhere where dwarves are born with beards, but there's no general answer to this.
I was wondering whether dwarfs (e.g. the ones from LOTR) are born with a beard.
I've just read something about baby hedgehogs getting born with a membrane on their spikes from hurting their mom (source). So I figured the beard of a baby dwarf could be covered with such a membrane just like th...
I mean, I know it looks all glamorous from the outside, a non-stop party of nearly hellenistic levels of debauchery... But surely you must realize there's actually a lot of work involved.
@SSumner I can kinda understand that; I spend more of my time on chat and mod activities mostly because I can always do them and they take less brainpower, answering questions I can only really do after a question that I am capable of and interested in answering turns up, which is not very common
@Shog9 reminds me of a dept meeting at the school i used to teach at. we were asked what we liked most about teaching. most everyone said, "i like helping". one guy said, "i like seeing the look in their eyes when i tell them that they've just gone over their [missed attendance] hours and they've just failed the class."
I admit I went a bit overboard with that close reason. For some reason, I thought it was a new question; I hadn't noticed it already had a good answer.
@Ixrec he got a promotion to become the course director for that class. his boss got a promotion, and everyone in the class moved up a spot. this was some 13 years ago. last i heard, he was still there.
I've already stepped down my answering activity in order to spend more time on moderation, and a diamond would help me to do so more effectively. This site has brought me a lot of enjoyment, and it's nice to put something back into it - I owe it.
And the extra responsibility bestowed by the diamond would put more pressure on me to do things I know I should do but never seem to get round to, like participating more on meta and (as promised in my questionnaire response) broadening the site's range by asking about less popular SFF works.
@Shog9 One of the questions that didn't make the cut for the questionnaire was about what to do about the high rep users that seem to be leaving. From what I've seen, a large part of their reasons for leaving has been dissatisfaction with the current mods. I don't know the full story behind some of these incidents so I'm not taking sides, but I'm hoping these users will be more likely to work with me since I would be a new mod (especially since I've developed somewhat of a rapport with them).
@NapoleonWilson I think the current mod team is doing a good job overall -- I don't really have any complaints. Nonetheless, there seems to be a perception (whether backed by reality or not) that the mods take sides, don't listen, etc. I'm hoping some fresh blood will help ease the problem of that perception, and I think I'm one of the nominees who might be able to do that.
Of course, I'm well aware that if I need to act against these users I might lose my rapport with them and become a "bad guy", too, but maybe I can keep them around long enough for the next mod election so we get some new "good cops".
Apart from the fact that I dispute the idea of a "high-rep user migration" in the first place, I think those few high-rep users who did leave over the past year did for various reasons.
One or two of them did have rather public disputes with mods, but I tend to agree with Napolean -- they were angry that the mods did their job, which presumably, you or I would also have to do in their shoes.
@Null this is one of the reasons why the moderator team wanted to hold an election. Not because folks are leaving; people come and go as they please, and trying to stand in their way or placate them never really works. But rather because they've been too burdened to really do as much hand-holding and outreach as they would like. It may be that some people here are feeling adrift and would like to have more of an opportunity to talk to the mod team, socially.
So maybe you could construct some kind of query that first gets all posts by deleted users and then looks for often recurring user IDs under them to get deleted users with many posts. By then looking at them you might be able to deduce the actual username from comments and stuff.
@NapoleonWilson just beware that some folks might see this as... Rude. IOW, if you're gonna make more work for the mod team by motivating departed people to come back and beg for the deletion of any comment that mentions them, you should wait until there are more mods.
That being said, I myself often have the feeling (on a totally different site, though) of many active and avid users disappearing (for entirely varied reasons, though) and am sometimes worried about that. But I guess that's the natural flow of things (as long as enough good people take their places).
@MikeEdenfield Unless someone is claiming a specific number (and isn't going to make the same argument with number +-50%) that's a waste of time. This strikes me as an emotional argument.
It's true that more outreach from the mods would probably make the more casual users here appreciate them better. ASR has been hanging out in Mos lately, and seems widely liked; the same could also be said of Thaddeus. The K-team aren't as visible, and most people (including myself) haven't interacted with them enough to get a feel for them. It'd be nice to get another visible and popular mod.
I've talked about stepping down my answering activity, but I'd still like to be active and visible - chatting in Mos, plenty of commenting and editing, and so on - if I'm elected.
also, off-topic but sortof related: every time I get annoyed at having to write absurd SQL queries for work, I overhear the guy in the next cube over in a 45-minute coversation about how many pixels to the left to move a report label and I feel better.
Back in October of 2006, Marvel released a video game called Marvel: Ultimate Alliance, which allowed players to play as several different Marvel characters such as Spider-Man, some Avengers characters, Defenders characters, X-Men characters, the Fantastic Four, and several other notable heroes. ...
What is migration?
Migration allows an off-topic question to be gracefully moved to another site in the Stack Exchange network. It preserves the current revision of the question, all its answers, any comments on any post, as well as most of the votes.
Side effects of migration
Down votes are ...
If yes, then migrate. If no, then suggest to the OP that they re-ask it over there in an improved format (tell them how it could be improved to fit in better over there).
but I also know that having your question moved out from under you can be jarring to some users. IMO it's just as important to explain to the OP why it's off-topic here and on-topic there.
I think migration should be a two-part voting process. Outgoing site needs to vote to migrate, to any site, incoming needs to vote to accept. If outgoing votes for migration but incoming won't have it, it's just closed as off topic.
IMO it would be much better in the long term to explain to the OP about the scope of the sites, how to find other SE sites to ask questions on, and let them go ask it themselves.
@NapoleonWilson Do you think it's not good enough to tell the OP "This is a really good question, but out of scope here. They'd really appreciate this over on mudpies.stackexchange.com" ?
To me reposting is better because the user is directly involved in the process.
I've actually seen at least one user get angry when his question was migrated to another stack site because "I didn't ask it there."
@JasonBaker Maybe, but on SE the asker usually doesn't count that much anyway. ;-)
@MikeEdenfield Not if he won't reask it. And it gets even worse when he does reask it before the other one gets closed (or if it even won't). Suggesting to reask it over there can be the first step to cross-posts, and those are rarely a good idea.
@JasonBaker Depends on whether they create an account that reclaims the question or a brand new account that will need merging. And whether the comments end up devolving into arguments on whether the migration was a good idea.
@SQB because an account is a lot more than just a name. We already have folks complaining that creating accounts is too easy, that their personal details are associated with sites they don't remember signing up for. This would create a situation where we're doing the same sort of thing folks routinely write us to complain about site-scrapers doing: claiming membership of a site they had no intention of ever joining.
Pushing their question to a site they don't even have an account it, where they possibly have to jump through hoops to get their accounts merged if they don't do it the right way, is a better option?
Yeah... Some folks get really tetchy about that sorta thing.
And to bring this back into some semblance of relevance... We've had folks upset because a moderator they don't like had access to their account details. If you were in a situation like that, being careful to avoid creating an account in the wrong place would be your lifeline.
(BTW, sharing personal information from a user's account or using it for personal business is the biggest taboo here and the primary focus of the mod agreement: if anyone elected ever does this, their moderator access gets pulled immediately without discussion or debate, and we go through the logs with a fine-toothed comb to see what else they did. Just in case anyone running was wondering how much they could get away with here.)
Why not make it an explicit question for the OP then? First, the site votes for migration, to any site, then the OP gets the question if they want to automatically (create an account at the other Stack and reask the question there).
That's the same net effect as telling the OP to ask it at that stack, except that a) the account is created automatically to make sure that goes right, and b) the OP doesn't have to retype / copy and paste.
Almost never.
These paths have a place when two conditions exist:
There is a clearly-defined topic that is wholly inappropriate on one site and wholly appropriate on another.
That topic is asked about daily on the former site.
This is pretty rare. Especially if the first site isn't Stack Ove...