« first day (2147 days earlier)      last day (2537 days later) » 

00:03
@M.A.R. is removing thanks considered to be legit?
 
1 hour later…
01:05
@AvnishKabaj yes, as long as you don't leave serious problems behind
Grammar edits are easier to find
Very well then sire onward question editing I shall go
01:42
I have 3.7k rep and 268 posts on SO, and still don't know whom to vote for in that list; all of those are completely new people to me (except Art, for the Charcoal activity)
@Loong oh, that's cool
like MS Office
got it
02:42
@AvnishKabaj It's visible in the notification inbox of the person you pinged, even if you remove the msg (and it's also always visible to room owners anyway)
Gud 2 know
@GaurangTandon any ideas ?
No man
This is a toughie
I don't know how to go about it
Will have to Google
Pls help quick
This is not homework
Pls don't close answer my expert question
which pg number? book?
03:03
Fiitjee workbook
Lol! 12th?
11th
In 12th now I guess
well what is the answer? :P
cries
ask on main, i've no clue
03:18
Okie will later when free
k don't forget
@AvnishKabaj also please have a look at the two mschouhan I posted yesterday if you're free
Which ones?
04:13
@AvnishKabaj I guess this is what happens:
The last step would involve an S+ ion, I just drew the final product
@Rick Thaaaaaanks a lot
04:50
19 hours ago, by Gaurang Tandon
@anyone owning MS Chouhan; Advanced Problems In Organic Chemistry; do you know the mechanism of q26 alkenes chapter? solution seems awkward. thanks!
21 hours ago, by Gaurang Tandon
@anyone owning MS Chouhan; Advanced Problems In Organic Chemistry; please see Q14 alkenes chapter; where we are to count number of transition states and intermediates
@AvnishKabaj ---^
@Rick ok, so the first step is an acid base reaction, and then the stronger nucleophilie SH- attacks; nice! thanks Rick :D
@GaurangTandon No idea
But seems to be a useless question
@GaurangTandon pls ask on main
@AvnishKabaj yeah i'll see it once again and then ask
thanks for checking out though!
05:43
is there any method to report problems in LibreText articles?
the above article for example has the header "ozonolysis of alkenes and alkynes" but the content for alkynes is missing
 
1 hour later…
07:04
@GaurangTandon @AvnishKabaj high on organic uh?
@MollyCooL boi chemistry is organic
Physical chem = physics
Inorganic = useless memorization
07:25
@MollyCooL "high"? i'd say "drunk" rather
another fresh question just for you @MollyCooL ;)
0
Q: NGP mechanism vs the humble carbocation mechanism

Gaurang TandonQuestion: Predict the product of: ($\ce{C^*}$ is a $\ce{C^14}$ carbon) My attempt: I simply assumed the super-leaving group $\ce{-OTs^-}$ would leave, forming a primary ethylbenzene carbocation. That would rearrange via a hydride shift to form a secondary carbocation on $\ce{C^*}$ ...

and oh, the title is definitely clickbait xD
-_- why do I dont understand a word!
hehe, don't worry ;)
@AvnishKabaj True but org sucks atleast when I haven’t started studying -_-
that moment when Lord Krishna asks how elements were formed
0
Q: How was elements formed?

Akash. BWell I know that compounds was formed from elements but how was elements formed, that make up our whole world and us?

xD
@GaurangTandon paapi narak jayega
07:36
@AvnishKabaj bhagwaan apne chem.se ke bhakton ki bhakti test kar rahein hain, bas aur kuch nahin...
 
1 hour later…
08:42
XD
I don’t understand a word of the other msgs tho.
09:17
@MollyCooL you don't know Hindi...?
09:31
$\ce{OH-}\mathbf{\neq good~leaving~group.}$ — orthocresol ♦ Dec 1 '15 at 20:00
Outrageous!
!!!1!
Using MathJax when you can not use MathJax
@GaurangTandon it should be obvious. Two elements marry, do some stuff behind the scenes, and a new element is born
@GaurangTandon nope! South Indian
@M.A.R. Can be accepted by the OP if you would describe “the behind the scenes” process to the OP
09:54
@M.A.R. you just spoiled the meaning of chemical bonding for me forever
@MollyCooL oh nvm
 
3 hours later…
12:39
which is more nucleophilic: ammonia or hydrazine (in protic solvent)?
any clues?
(answer is hydrazine)
13:26
ok here's a 2012 answer by our (former?) moderator ManishEarth
2
A: SN1 like reaction acid-cataylzed hydrolysis of epoxide

ManishEarthNote that your question could do with some more data. Here is my answer based on what I think you mean: You ought to get a glycol. First, a proton from the acidic medium attacks the neucleophile, $\ce{O}$. This creates a positively charged trivalent oxygen. The electrons in one of the two $...

but it appears to me to be incorrect for the reason I commented below it
can anyone confirm I am entirely wrong? (the probability of which is probably very high)
I've no hope he will reply back, his last public activity was in 2015!
hence I ask you people @[any organic chemist] ---^
moreover, even if the carbocation is indeed rearrange-able, wouldn't it immediately rearrange to the position at the hydroxyl group? (since there it would be stabilized by a +M effect?)
13:50
Has the no editing period ended?
@TrustedUsers @GaurangTandon
@AvnishKabaj what is the "no editing period"? and when did it start?
@GaurangTandon after that meta post, I stopped doing homework edits and you did too
@AvnishKabaj i think the main point of that meta post was to avoid making edits on too many old questions (and consequently bumping them on the front page) all one after the other i.e. too many edits in a short time; so, I think if you make no more than 5-10 edits a day (all within half an hour) on old questions, you should probably live happily
2
14:07
here is another wrong answer to a popular question
4
A: Can hydride shift and methyl shift happen one after another in a carbocation?

Siddharth YadavYes it is possible. But it must fulfil some basic condition for that shift. The empty p-orbital of the carbocation must be in plane with the $\ce{C-H}$ or the $\ce{C-C}$ bond. When the alignment of a carbon–hydrogen bond with a vacant p orbital takes place allowing for hyperconjugation, a "ps...

i commented below it my views
@[any-organic-chemist] agrees or disagrees, can be helpful to hear your views, thank you!
i've raised an NAA flag on it
@GaurangTandon @ortho may have opinions
@GaurangTandon @AvnishKabaj Concur
@AvnishKabaj But don't just remove 'thanks', if there are other things that could be improved (@M.A.R.)
@hBy2Py i wish if there was a community-wiki list of users here organized by their field of specialisation, so i could ping the right one whenever needed :P
@hBy2Py :)
14:24
@hBy2Py M.A.R was just helping me out with stack overflow over here I don't do such trivial edits
14:43
@GaurangTandon That's an interesting idea, actually. Worthy of a meta post soliciting opinions, at least.
@hBy2Py well, considering that many super users don't check chat frequently (and many like the wonderful Klaus/Ben/Geoff are very less frequent on even the main site), i guess several of them would be annoyed if I ping them with my high school problems :P
@GaurangTandon True... but it would at least make it easy to know who to try to chat-ping.
Dunno, people may not want to advertise that way, though -- and get more chat-pings. :-)
This would be the reason for a meta post seeking opinions for whether it's a good idea to have an 'expertise-listing' meta post. ;-)
@hBy2Py i can already predict that meta post is gonna get a rain shower of downvotes xD
those who do want others to know what they do have already listed it in their profiles
mm, good point
at first, when I saw the all time top users
i was surprised so many of them didn't even disclose a single line about what field they specialize in
for those users, we can still make a decent guess of their field based on their most popular tags though ;)
15:45
@hBy2Py that's just what I said
@GaurangTandon HAHAHA TOTALLY WORTH IT
@GaurangTandon ugh, who pinned this?
@M.A.R. That would be me. Wanna make something of it?
@hBy2Py I wanna make coal out of it
<shrug> Unpin if you want... Don't want to leave the matter to stick around in people's minds any longer than necessary?
That.
Also because it's not my message
16:01
Fair enough -- it's really better emphasized in Spring Cleaning, anyways
16:31
Yay for blindly approving @Gau's tag wiki edits.
@Gau make sure they're good
16:56
@M.A.R. haha yeah :P i just realized I can earn points for editing something. Plus, it doesn't get bumped to the front page xD
@Loong since you are the nomenclature and standard notation expert here, please have a look at my humble attempt at that standard notation question :)
0
A: Standard LaTeX notation of SN, multiple acid dissociation constants, and electronic effects

Gaurang TandonSo, finally, I'll post the answer myself, based on the wonderful comments discussion above. Please upvote if you agree with all these notations, or downvote (and comment!) if you disagree with any of the points mentioned. For nucleophilic substitution reactions: S<sub>N</sub>1, S<sub>N</sub>2, ...

i eventually decided to post an answer based on whatever was discussed, but I couldn't official details for points 3 and 4
 
4 hours later…
20:51
94
Q: Ch-ch-ch-changes: Left nav, responsive design, & themes

Joe FriendCh-ch-ch-changes are coming. As you've hopefully read in our various posts on Teams, we are in the midst of some major work. We're introducing a new product, Teams (née channels), and doing the requisite research and design thinking to get it right. In addition, early on we realized that we have ...

OH SHIT
Didn't realise they were taking or fonts and badges away
😣😭😭😭😭😭
Where the hell is Mart when you need him?
Seems to me the badges and fonts would be pretty easy to include in the styles.
Unclear why they need to scrub them.
@Rick you didn't want me to see you hmming, but I did. You're totally exposed
Chat... it hides nothink
@hBy2Py some standardization
Oh.. must've missed that
20:57
@hBy2Py is explained in the same post, maybe
Well, somebody griped in an answer about standardizing badge symbols, and somebody else griped about standard fonts, too.
So, covered.
<nod>, or that first one they linked to in the "Q", maybe.
They're gonna do it anyway. PANIC
BTW, I don't get what's with these new chatter dudes. They remove messages way too often
First Rule of the Internet: Don't like anything. It's just going to get changed or taken down before long, anyways.
@hBy2Py no, that was the second one
Well crap, I'm missing everything important, lately.
21:00
The first one is mister intarwebz is always right
Oh, right -- that's this guy, right?
shivers
Yeah, I guess internet does look like that in 2018
@hBy2Py now imagine I pin this message, and everyone wonders what's so interesting about this image to be pinned. They click on the image, it opens in a new tab, and their face is hilarious
What ... have I done.
To myself.
I would be the author of this pinned thing.
Haha there you go
Well.
This will almost certainly be interesting.
Hopefully @Mart comes back while it's still up there.
First thing he sees on return to chat.
21:07
A nice first impression on the standardization
Or maybe he will envy the hair 😎😂
21:19
Hullo
@hBy2Py Who's this handsome fellow ;D
21:40
@Mithoron Note to self: Do not post odd pictures when @M.A.R. is around.
@hBy2Py I heard that
@Mithoron heyo

« first day (2147 days earlier)      last day (2537 days later) »