@ringo and @Nicolau I absolutely agree with "LaTeX in titles has always happened and will always happen." And it is not necessarily a bad thing. The biggest problem with it is the mhchem package, as the ce does produce some url slug issues for search engines. See this discussion on meta. [...]
But there are some more issues than that... It breaks the title on any sites that do not have MathJax installed, which I think is the bigger issue, see here and here. Whenever possible, try to make the title with real words only :D
My weekend was awesome, I went to an art event in Tokyo, where I bought a shirt, which says "International Motherf***er" on the front and on the back "Hooray for me and f*** you"
It always is, and once you start using strong language, you think more about the language and your rage as opposed to thinking about the argument you would want to make work
I enjoy keeping an eye on the 'hot' network questions bar, since they tend to give an interesting cross-section of questions from a dizzying array of areas. Because of this, I've come to know the little favicons for most of the Exchanges quite well, to where I can pick them by sight without even ...
I usually pay a very high attention to the formatting of anything I write, especially to the mathematical notation, because in my opinion it is really important. Of course, the most important thing in formatting is its consistency, and while in principle everyone is free to follow his own persona...
From what I can remember from my O-chem days, any atom with a lone pair in a similar configuration can undergo inversion but in the case of the amine, the energy barrier is low enough that it has been observed experimentally. I wouldn't be surprised if another example has been observed experimentally but I can't say for sure.
@LordStryker Hey, the link you provided answers it! The enrgy barrier aint that low in P. And I assume it increases down the group. So in ideal cases, N gives, others don't.
> The allotropes of phosphorus illustrate the variations in chemical properties that may occur among such forms. White phosphorus, for example, is a waxy white solid that bursts into flame spontaneously when exposed to air. It is also highly toxic. On the other hand, a second allotrope of phosphorus known as red phosphorus is far more stable, does not react with air, and is essentially nontoxic.
Doesnt mention thermo or kinetic.
@LordStryker Rather, none of the pages mention kinetic/thermo. Black is thermo most stable.
This might help. "Bulk crystals of black P are stable under ambient conditions for at least a few months" (from: http://www.pnas.org/content/112/15/4523.full.pdf?sid=d4b76ccd-9c5c-409d-a066-6756a1e4d250)
now find a lifetime for red phosphorus
we all know red phosphorus is used for match heads and those can last years
Look, when I think of stable I think of (in terms of thermodynamics) lowest free energy. If deltaG is negative, then the more stable it is. The larger the magnitude of deltaG, the more stable it is. kinetics simply describes how fast A -> B
What is the difference between thermodynamic and kinetic stability? I'd like a basic explanation, but not too simple. For example, methane does not burn until lit -- why?
@user223679 , if you wanna know the kinetic stability of a substance then you must know PATH of reaction, HOW it is converted and TO WHAT is is converted to AND EVERY ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION.
@Mann That would render the question useless. Anyway, it looks confusing as kinetics deal with reaction mechanism and we dont know which reaction is being taken as the standard. Or in other words, as @LordStryker said, we dont know the conditions :)
@user223679 generally we'd use room temp and pressure as a reference point. Then from that point on, assuming all things equal, you could simply examine the 'lifetime' of a substance and determine its stability
I ruled out white and yellow as being quite reactive.
Red and black allotropes are both polymeric and comparitively less reactive.
Black looks the most stable one thermodynamically. But kinetically, I have no idea whether it should be red or black.
The answer provided to me is Red.
(Rel...
everyday-chemisty is a useful way for people to find questions that laypeople might ask about chemistry. It's a bit of a "meta" tag but we can hold (or re-hold) that discussion another time, since I think it does have some utility.
It gets abused by new(er) users thinking that it means chemistr...