« first day (1152 days earlier)      last day (3241 days later) » 

3:14 PM
@Jonsca I have a question: Should I flag a comment that only says thanks. great answer!?
On one hand, it's noise.
On the other hand, I fear it's too trivial to waste your time with it.
What the? Who starred that? I thought nobody was in.
 
@M.A.Ramezani From a historical perspective, Chem:SE has been quite lenient/laid-back about comments to questions.
 
Oh, @Lord!
 
That may change in the future. I'm sure that since we've managed to grow quite a bit we may want to address that.
 
@LordStryker Yeah. That's another reason I ask.
 
I don't have a problem with it but I can see how it may become problematic if its happening a lot.
 
3:16 PM
Exactly. @Lord do you watch volleyball matches?
 
Deleting thank-yous can seem unduly aggressive and make us seem like a very cold community...
@M.A.Ramezani I unfortunately do not. I don't get television at my house and I've never been a big follower of volleyball not that I'm opposed to watching the women play or anything ;)
 
Or, it could mean that we're firm and we stick to the rules.
 
And then the rules may seem unnecessary or overly cold
 
They always do.
 
Its a grey area. I of course defer the ruling on this to the community
 
3:18 PM
Yeah. But another time. This time I'm only expecting @Jonsca's answer.
 
I'm anxious to see what @jonsca says. (ping me in your reply please) :)
 
I'm desperately looking for a bot for chem.SE chat.
 
Why is that?
 
For the sake of fun.
Also, it would be chic to have something like that report new user's late answers. (Most of which, are NAA)
Oh crud, I'm almost vote-capping in chem.SE today.
 
@M.A.Ramezani : Hi
 
3:27 PM
Ooops.
@Onthewaytosuccess Hullo!
I just approved a bad edit.
 
You are saying the one I edited ?
 
Yeah.
What is ?!
 
What is that link leads to/.
If you approve and unhappy abt it, simply undo it
 
Forget that link. The tag you created isn't useful unfortunately.
@Lord you there?
 
Okay, doesn't matter
 
3:31 PM
BTW @ontheway if you add a space after @ you won't ping the person you want.
 
Oh I see ,I didn't know it earlier
 
Nevermind, I see you pinging wrongly in a lot of your comments. :}
 
Ya I did it wrong
@M.A.Ramezani: Aren't you interested in maths>
 
I'm kinda interested, but only because of chemistry.
@ M.A.Ramezani: Then what is special for duplicate ones rather than other HW quizes? — On the way to success 12 mins ago
@Ontheway I meant that even if it doesn't get closed as HW, it'll get closed as a dup.
 
Aha
I get it now
Are you doing A/L or what?
 
3:36 PM
What's A/L?
 
@M.A.Ramezani Sorry I was talking with my colleague
 
It's OK. I wanted to ask you to edit a question.
 
@LordStryker: Hi
 
Ah man! I approved a bad edit on this. Could someone please add the appropriate tags? (choose improve edit option) — M.A.Ramezani 7 mins ago
 
@M.A.Ramezani : It is stand for Advance Level
 
3:39 PM
Oh?
Then how do you define Advanced Level?
 
hey @Onthewaytosuccess That is a very motivated name :)
 
Entrance exam for universities
@LordStryker:Of course that is why I am using it.
Give me few more minutes.
I have a work to do
 
@Onthewaytosuccess I've got them two years later. Am currently studying for chemistry olympiad.
Though I'll concentrate more on it after a few months.
 
3:52 PM
Welcome back @Mixcels!
 
@M.A.Ramezani: It means , already you are an university fellow?
 
Well I think I told you that I'm not. I'm studying 10th.
High school.
 
Nice to hear that you are an olympiad man
 
Hah, I'm not a man yet.
 
I am 13 th grade
Lol
 
4:06 PM
Pre-university?
 
you are about to be a mna
Yes pre university
@Jo 7: Hi
 
Oh, my! A plane! \o @Jo7!
Welcome to the chatroom!
 
@Jo 7: Are you a person in aviation industry? your profiles on the site seems like that
 
@Ontheway another note about pings: You should use three letters/numbers, without spaces for a ping.
For example, @on the way to success doesn't ping you.
But @ont does.
So, @Jo 7 won't ping him.
But @Jo7 will.
 
Okay, thanks
@Jo7: Are you a person in aviation industry? your profiles on the site seems like that
 
4:16 PM
@M.A.Ramezani Yes I am back....even though this tab was open all the time.
 
Hah! Well, blame SE's chat for it.
 
4:29 PM
@M.A.Ramezani : Now what is the time there in Iran?
 
Almost 21:00.
 
Here 22
Exactly
 
Hmm$\ldots$
Are you a volleyball fan?
I'm asking this from everyone for 3263627 times.
 
Lol
Ya somewhat
It is our national game
 
Oh?
Well, I'm popping up like oil.
 
4:32 PM
I have played it , but mostly I am into cricket .But I like volleyball
 
Do you watch the world league games?
 
Not much .bro
 
Too bad.
 
don't you play chess
 
Nah. Not into it.
I just know what bishop is, if that helps.
 
4:35 PM
too bad
Don't you like martial arts
 
Go on. I'm listening.
 
That moment when you realize you've been VASTLY overcompkicatibg your model.
*overcomplicating
 
Over whating?
 
4:37 PM
why?
 
@BreakingBioinformatics You've been VASTLY overcomplicating your model.
Now give me the reaction I'm waiting for!
 
@M.A.Ramezani If you ask nicely they might do cyclohexane for you: phys.org/news/…
 
xD @M.A.Ramezan
 
AAAAAAAAUUUUUGH.
@M.A.Ramezani Happy?
 
4:39 PM
@LordStryker Asking nicely? Ultrafast? They don't fit my style.
 
@LordStryker You're computational as well, right?
 
@BreakingBioinformatics I'd been happier if you sighed better than that.
@BreakingBioinformatics No, he's a human, I think.
 
You wouldn't want to see a cyclohexane inversion with your own eyes? I'm surprised but okay.
 
@LordStryker It's like injecting an ampule. Scary!
 
@LordStryker: Where you from?
 
4:41 PM
I'm from the United States.
 
@M.A.Ramezani Wasn't sighing. I was scream/groaning.
 
I currently reside in the United States.
 
@BreakingBioinformatics Couldn't hear you. LOUDER! Please.
 
It means a forigner in USA
 
No, @Lord is a native English man, I guess.
 
4:43 PM
@Lord: We need a reply
 
@Lord: We like to ping you.
 
He's talking to a colleague.
 
@M.A.Ramezani AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
 
4:44 PM
He have many colleague, I think xD
 
@BreakingBioinformatics OK that's a start. Go on practicing.
 
What are you guys even doing :O @M.A.Ramezani @BreakingBioinformatics
 
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
 
@M.A.Ramezani Go tile the sea. X
XP
 
@Lord what question?
 
Oh I see
Are u a chemist @Lord
 
@Ont I am a computational chemist.
 
Is it worth to such a thing
 
4:49 PM
@LordStryker Yes! Company!
(well)
 
I mean isn'i it hard
 
(I'm more computational biochemistry)
 
@Ont Worth really is defined by what you enjoy doing.
 
(but sill)
*still
 
what but still
 
4:49 PM
@BreakingBioinformatics That is great! Computational chemistry can be very rewarding.
 
@Lord ; ya of course
 
@BreakingBioinformatics Man unless you're on android, you can edit chat messages.
 
What is the university you attend @Lord
 
@M.A.Ramezani I'm on an iPhone.
 
Oh blow.
 
4:50 PM
@Ont Anonymous University ;)
 
@LordStryker REPRESENT!
 
If anyone here questions my credentials, @Martin-マーチン can vouch for me :)
 
@Onthewaytosuccess @Lords' university.
 
I also like to join that @Lord
Where is it @Lord
 
Where Lords hang and talk about chemcraft.
 
4:51 PM
haha I hate density functional theory.
I just preach glory of B3LYP because Martin hates that functional. :D
 
Ya you want to hate it, if you don't like it @Lord
 
Ahan.
 
I stand by coupled-cluster methods. DFT is just a dirty dirty 'science'.
 
I have to leave
 
4:52 PM
Let me clarify, density functional APPROXIMATIONS are dirty.
The theory itself is exact, elegant, and amazing.
 
Yes they may be dirty, but now I want to leave
bye all of you
 
Bye @ont
 
And Now His Watch is Ended
 
? @Hippalectryon
 
4:53 PM
Just a GoT reference :3
 
5:38 PM
Oh my goodness!
@santiago @santiago!
Isn't this your fan? I thought you ate his account.
 
@Onthewaytosuccess sorry about the long wait was offline...
 
Hullo @JO7! Welcome to the chemistry chatroom!
 
Hi
I didn't actually mean to join this chat room.
 
5:54 PM
No probs.
Heh. Hullo Choppy!
@Jo7 Join us whenever you ran into a chem problem would you?
 
hisses at the light that is shone upon him
 
Is there a light there? You're walking on the beach.
 
I just wanted to lurk and observe
goes to a beach hut
 
Hah!
Too bad @Lord isn't present to accompany. Chat's been a busy lonely street these days.
Looks beyond the horizon
 
Don't you have other things to do?
a ship appears
 
5:58 PM
@M.A.Ramezani Ok thanks.
 
Ah man, this stuff reminds me that I totally wanted to build a world to set an RPG campaign in
 
Go minecraft go choppy!
 
Yo yo yo
@M.A.Ramezani Chat has been bangin' the past few days I don't know what you are talking about.
 
minecraft?
 
@M.A.Ramezani yes, but look at his revised question - it turned out good in the end
 
6:01 PM
hiho @Lord
 
\o @tschoppi How are things in the land of the Swiss?
 
pretty cheesy
heh
 
Pretty chocolate.
 
things are fine, I guess. today was a great day productivity-wise, I made a huge leap in stuff to study
 
I was just preparing dinner.
 
6:03 PM
@M.A.Ramezani that user's post was rescued from the deep bowels of perdition to be half way reasonable
 
and on your side of the pond?
 
@tschoppi A @Martin-like leap?
@santiago Was that the very post that da drama happened?
 
@M.A.Ramezani honestly, I wouldn't know
 
Morning BTW!
 
@M.A.Ramezani yes, yes it was
 
6:04 PM
@tschoppi He's a bit liberal in his choices.
"..."
 
What in the hell am I awake at 4am?
 
@santiago Why in the hell are you awake at 4 a.m.?
@santiago Oh, so I've found the monument.
 
the bolts in my legs have come a bit loose
 
Does it hurt?
 
a bit
but pain is like advertising in this case, can and should be ignored
I wonder how close I am to an 'Outspoken' badge
 
6:09 PM
It only takes five months.
 
eh?
 
@tschoppi Just another 'lazy' summer day over here. Hot weather and indoor climate control facilitates good computational chemistry research. :)
 
@santiago, my son, to be a real chat reg, thou needst be pure of heart. Thou shalt hath a soul as transparenth as water.
 
I have a soul?
 
I dunno. Do you taste like chicken?
 
6:13 PM
sometimes, am not that peckish to try
 
So you do have a soul.
 
btw, can someone fix this trainwreck? chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/33218/… - it is burning my retinas
 
Soulless people don't know how to taste.
I just asked them.
 
@M.A.Ramezani what?!?!? here I thought I was some soulless jerk
 
Son, you may seem ugly in the outside, but inside, you're the beauty of a pearl.
 
6:15 PM
lol, I am ugly like a fox
 
Fox you say . . .
 
You are the ellipsis king
 
KNEEL BEFORE ME!
 
can't kneel, bolts in my leg are loose
heh
 
oh dear
You guys...
 
6:26 PM
lol
 
time to go for me :è
:P
see ya
 
Cya!
 
This has been another episode of the @santiago and @M.A.Ramezani comedy show, stay tuned for further episodes after this commercial break
2
see ya later @tschoppi
 
Oh, a sitcom?
Where's my popcorn?
 
Okay, here's a fun one: You are offered $10 million dollars but you are now forbidden to ever wear shoes/sandals/boots/etc. of any kind for the rest of your life. Socks are okay.
 
6:29 PM
I'd put off socks.
 
commercial Do you have rampant poltergeists floating around your palace? eating your popcorn, giving you wedgies when entertaining royalty? Yes? Well, run like hell, cause they are coming to get you, Barbara... end commercial
 
Most of the me outside is on a bike, anyways.
@santiago Where's da music? It's no fun without a music.
 
@M.A.Ramezani poltergeists took it
@LordStryker $10 million and I get to share my foot pot pourri? sweeeet!
 
HA!
@M.A.Ramezani Need a music suggestion
or @santiago. Feel free to suggest as well
 
@LordStryker 'Let's do the Time Warp'
welcome @jonsca to the show
 
6:35 PM
@M.A.Ramezani I would say once the "Thank you" gets stale (so after it's long been seen), they are fair game, but pouncing on them 5 minutes later is probably unreasonable
 
Aha.
 
@LordStryker
 
@jonsca \o
 
No hard and fast rule, though
 
@santiago Now Playing: "Time Warp"
 
6:37 PM
Be back later!
 
Please let me edit your question. By editing it you're disallowing me. — M.A.Ramezani 2 mins ago
If you're wondering what the heck I'm doing.
 
I thought you were eaten by poltergeists
 
@santiago What? Are you kidding me? I ate five poltergeists for lunch.
(I was fasting BTW)
 
@M.A.Ramezani so that is where they went
 
Wut? They worked for you?
 
6:44 PM
@M.A.Ramezani that's cool, poltergeists have negative calories
 
@Lord's playing a link. O.0
 
hmmm, maybe the bolts and wires in my leg could be tuned to be a strange medical kind of guitar
 

« first day (1152 days earlier)      last day (3241 days later) »