First, I've read the convo. Obviously, that's shocking and (pardon if I don't use the perfect exact word) quite defamatory. I don't know if you are still thinking all these things but anyway, I think there's some points to clarify
First, I have no issue with big design firms or whatever you think about this. And even if I did, it wouldn't matter! Same as if you would despise cheap stuff or whatever this is called
Your extra long convo with you and scott using the public inkspot as your personal facebook
also, before you exert too much energy on this, I have no serious beef with you. I disagree with some of your posts. That is all. That we may disagree on things is OK.
So anyway, I personally consider it immature and not very brave to do this in the way it was done, especially coming from 2 very experienced users always claiming I'm not speaking to them properly and implying "lot" of people hate me
You are free to feel that way. I, on the other hand, consider it immature and not very brave for you to handle it the way you did. But again, that's OK. We don't have to agree.
You never saw me doing such thing to any of you. And honestly I might have been rude with Scott when he insulted me and called me names, but I don't think we ever had anything but disagreements you and I
What way?
What would you do if you were a new user on a forum and mods ignore your flags, and oldest users mock you publicly and exaggerate greatly what you did?
DA01... do you do this so frequently that you can't remember? I'm refering to you and Scott, and some mods long discussion on how horrible I am and how I upset pretty much every old users :)
I'm all for being honest. And trying to be clear, though I think that's one of the challenges we may have. I don't think we're always interpreting each others tone properly.
One of the hazards of online communication.
And when I ask "what do you mean" I do literally, honestly mean that.
Your interpretation of things is obviously much different than mine, hence why I ask for clarification.
If you find it horrible that I used the word "competent" to mean "expert" or "qualified", I think the tone, allegations, accusations and all the things you've talked about were a few levels higher than that in term of being mean
I said this elsewhere: how about you and I just assume we aren't trying to be mean in our comments and that maybe you and I misinterpret the tone of each other's comments at times
And just to be clear, I'm not the one who brought up first that language barrier thing. I think you or Scott did. But you know, when you speak a second language, the hardest part is to grasp idioms and some nuances. So you truly need to be understanding with this
The only reason why you get a bypass on those terms is because 1) no one react and 2) I read it as "she blablabla" because I don't even see that was actually an insult to mock me and belittle me!
I just wanted to show you that you may feel insulted by how I write sometimes but I could too, and unlike what I get, I really have the excuse of having a limited vocabulary
Like you know with that "competent" comment, I thought what shocked you is that I used "a random designer", then I see it's the word "competent". Oh well
It's ok if you comment, that's what these fields are made for! And I will too. I just personally don't like long convos that get nowhere and comments that don't really bring any suggestions and may look simply snarky
And all the "Yes you're right DA, I see we all agree, oh she's so mean " come on
It,s not very honorable and fair to see the little "alliances" and honestly, because you'reold users, you were just free to do whatever you want, while I can't even say anything without being told I'm rude.
So let's admit that wasn't really fair.
The whole convo on the inkspot should have been private. And well, I can't stop anyone from saying bad things about me, but ideally not trashing me in public
Or if they do, then I,d like to have that freedom as well :D
It was a public conversation. You were and are free to join in. It was also a conversation that only came up because you were continually bringing the topic up. So maybe it wasn't fair on our part, but then again, maybe it isn't fair that you keep bringing this up in so many different ways. Sometimes it's best to just let it go.
And just so you are clear, there are no private conversations.
If you start a chat, it's public.
This conversation we're having right now is public.
Honestly if you 2 would have been having a chat, and it would have been about another user (and not me), be certain I would have step in and told you all to get a room or to stop.
It's fine, I don't need to be satisfied with this, I wish it would have simply remained civil instead. What you can do is well... I can't tell you what to do. Have some empathy for other users even if you are in a position of "power" or strength
I just wanted to have a little chat with you because we haven't talked since that convo thing and I do feel you are still able to understand how I felt with that
And really, I don't dislike "big firm". If I made that comment on the olympic logo, I was more trying to get the topic back on that poor $300 logo for the OP. I won,t like to you, and I've posted on this too, I never really liked the threads that ended in super long discussions that become half-unrelated
And I don,t know, I guess I find them ugly.
Maybe it wasn't said in a delicate way, I can admit that
On another forum, I would have probably post "Are you 2 done talking about 1,000,000$ logo? The guy isn't even dreaming of having $300 ffs!"
That's all fine. Though note that it was a chat room conversation. This is why comments are moved to chat rooms--so that a discussion can actually take place and not clutter the main page. The idea is if a person isn't interested in the topic, they don't have to join the chat room.