0
El problema que he encontrado es fácilmente reproducible con estos dos objetos relacionados mediante herencia:
struct B
{
virtual void update() = 0;
};
struct D : B
{
void update() override
{
std::cout << this << ' ' << __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ << '\n';
}
};
Dispongo de uno...
fdgtfgghfhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhfhghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghghg
18
Yes, you can definitely use = default for such destructors. Especially if you were just going to replace it with {}. I think the = default one is nicer, because it's more explicit, so it immediately catches the eye and leaves no room for doubt.
However, here are a couple of notes to take into co...
