I like Federal job guarantee better, although I understand UBI has its own merit
If automation develops to such a degree that many people lose their jobs, then the coorporations that benefit from automation should pay tax to fund UBI
Anyway, that is not my business. I am just recently addicted to your country's politics
@Tim that doesn't answer the question. How about a cap on how much money the government is allowed to collect from its populace? How about a cap on how many people can have kids in a given year? How about a cap on how many strangers you're allowed to make friends with? It's one thing to say "there should be a cap" and it's another thing to look at how such a cap would be implemented, who would enforce it and how, what incentives the cap would create, and what the actual effects would be.
@Tim okay. Just don't paint things with a broad brush, that's all. There are rich people who unjustly accumulated their wealth. And there are rich people who got rich because they drastically improved the quality of life of millions of people. There are poor people who are the victims of chance. And there are also poor people who are simply unwilling to make any effort to change their situation.
No poor people really likes to stay where they are. They have lost chances from the beginning when they go to school and when they look for jobs and when they are discriminated. They are stuck where they are, and have lost hope
Some billionaire that are philanthropist and humanitarian are not actually as good faithed as you think.
They are better than those who aren't, but still not doing enough compared to how they acquired their wealth Bill Gates https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e8Yu5xJpOY
@Tim you're missing the point. I'm telling you that there is a full spectrum of possibilities, and there are real people at many points on that spectrum. You respond that some people are not so humanitarian as they appear. The point is that some are, and some are more humanitarian than they appear, and you need to recognize the variety that exists.
@Tim again, you are painting with a broad brush. You are describing some people, not all. The statement "NO poor person likes to stay where they are" is false.
@Tim I do understand what you are saying. It is too broad a generality. How "they" acquired their wealth also varies widely.
@Tim Okay, I'm considering it. I imagine you're considering what your response would be to that situation. So my question to you is—do you think that EVERY person would have a response to that situation identical to yours?
There are more things in Heaven and Earth, @Tim, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
@Tim indeed I can. It is precisely my point, that you are making claims about broad groups of people, that do not accurately characterize ALL of the people in the groups you are talking about.
@Wildcard right, desire for profit is the only possible incentive. I bet that explains why telcos are so efficient and innovative and have such amazingly good customer service.
@Wildcard also, posting a Lobster-man video would completely undermine the credibility of your Libertarian Theology - if it had any to begin with. (US Style) Libertarianism is sound-bite propaganda that works on Americans to get them to support bullshit ideas that harm them directly, and benefit only the rich and powerful (like "tax is theft", "regulations are bad", "the government is evil").
Governments do not have any incentive to keep the quality high. Once the taxpayers are locked into funding something, there is no actual penalty for doing a bad job at providing it.
That comment, if literally and generally interpreted, is an argument for having no govt managed anything.
Govt managed things can be bad, sure. India is a good case in mind. The govt is a nightmare. But I hope this isn't universally true.
@Wildcard Corrupted boot sector perhaps? Perhaps the thermometer doesn't have UEFI.
@Wildcard The general issue is that having stuff run by govts can be problematic. Having stuff run by private profit driven entities can be as or more problematic.
But I'm sure you're already aware of that.
In India, one is driven to deal with corporations because the govt is so terrible. For example, with internet. I still like the idea of municipal broadband. And similar comments apply to banks.
I used to use MTNL for awhile. It's govt owned, and has the worst customer service imaginable. It's also only alive because it's propped up by the central govt, which spends alarming amounts of money on it. Left to itself, it would have become bankrupt several times over. But, again, I still think municipal broadband is a good idea.
@FaheemMitha it was a continuation of my previous two comments, which might have been obvious from context but clearly wasn't.
@FaheemMitha that's true, but when you are free to go to a different such entity, it mitigates the problem to some degree. For some industries that is prohibitively impractical, but transportation is not one of them.
@FaheemMitha but why is there a second copy of the monthly energy report word doc on there in the first place? :)
@FaheemMitha there are banks in the US with horrendous customer service as it is. But you can switch to other banks, generally speaking. Some banks have excellent service.
@FaheemMitha yep, that's the sort of concern I have when I hear people proposing, "Let's just have the government run our healthcare, since they're doing such a great job of managing everything else they're in charge of." Not. And there is one sector where they DO manage the healthcare, which is for veterans, and they do an absolutely terrible job of it.
@Wildcard just because YOUR government has been completely taken over by corporate governments doesn't mean that all governments are, or that it incompetence and malice are inherent to government-run services. In parts of the world where the govt hasn't yet been completely hijacked by corporations, govt-run services are efficient, and effective. corruption and lobbying are whittling away at that, but the fight is far from over.
the fight may as well be over in the US because you've all been brain-washed by corporate interests that the government is your enemy. it's not. corporations (and the 0.001% who own them) are the enemy - and by refusing to take back control of your government, refusing to even believe that government CAN be a weapon on your side, you're giving up. You are ceding the power of government to corporate control who now have two huge sticks to beat you down with.
governments, of course, aren't all good. or all bad. they can be a force for good or a force for evil. it depends on whose interests they serve. they can serve the interests of the people. or they can serve the interests of malevolent artificial entities that run on the substrate of the legal system rather than silicon....and not only run on it, they adapt and modify their substrate to suit themselves.
oops. I wrote "corporate governments" above in the first sentence. I meant "corporate interests". although, technically, both phrases are accurate when talking about the US.
@Wildcard I don't actually disagree with what you are saying, per se. But such arguments can be interpreted broadly as - govts suck - let's hand it over to private entities. Language can be tricky.
@Wildcard Hmm. Still probably better than having private insurance companies grow fat at the expense of the taxpayer. And it's also true (I think) that US health care is among the most expensive in the world. Aren't there mechanisms for holding govts accountable? And not just voting.
Yes, I've heard horror stories about the VA too.
I'm not familiar with how the US system works, but if the govt messes up health care management, isn't there a finer grained way for making them accountable for performance other than (say) a presidential election every 4 years?
@cas I generally agree with what you say, but isn't the AU govt pretty much run by corporations too?
@overexchange I lost the context for this (which answer?), but Jesse_b has it. Short answer: "yes", although hearing that an answer says that you have a mix of Debian and Ubuntu is ... not good, in my opinion.
From the provided output, your specific issue is that the packages you want to install depend on libsystemd-journal0, and you have no configured repositories that provide that package. It seems you have a mix of Debian and Ubuntu repositories inside that container and that is likely the source o...
After many years using both, I can say that the real differences are:
H/W vendor support for various server hardware subsystems like:
latest FiberChannel drivers
iSCSI offloading support
10Gbps Ethernet
online firmware (BIOS, NMI) updaters
SCSI storage accelerators
Software SCSI drivers (lik...
Main Difference is Ubuntu is based on Debian system. It uses .deb packages. While redhat uses it own package system .rpm (red hat package manager ).
Redhat is free but it is charged for support (updates), when Ubuntu is totally free with support for desktop users only professional support is cha...
@Jesse_b We use Ubuntu, actually. But I think only because our main sysadmin knows the Debian world (I don't think he's even ever strayed away from Ubuntu), so it was far more painless for him to just use Ubuntu server installs.
@terdon Yeah I know it's used and apparently it is pretty widely used for web hosting as well but I just have never personally had experience with it being used at the enterprise level
I was quite surprised when I joined, I was expecting a Debian or a RH/CentOS or something. However, after almost 5 years or so, I have to say that the experience of running Ubuntu Server LTS versions as production machines has been quite pleasant.
@Jesse_b Yes, absolutely. This is the only time I've seen it used in a professional setting.
> A distributed version control system (DVCS) is a type of version control where the complete codebase — including its full version history — is mirrored on every developer's computer. Changes to files are tracked between computers.
Seriously, I'd check out a yoga class. Possible pilates.
A qualified yoga instructor should be able to give you advice about what specialised work you should do.
One-on-one yoga instruction is probably very expensive in the US, so I'm not suggesting that.
A common cause of back problems is simply back muscle weakness.
Because those muscles often don't get exercised properly. Also, muscles need to be stretched, at least occasionally.
Sitting in chairs a lot doesn't help.
Oh, and incidentally, I used to regularly get back muscle pulls (or something like that), before I did yoga. It hasn't happened since I've been doing yoga regularly. Though I'm not claiming my fitness regimen is adequate or anything.
Very painful. Used to have hobble around for several days before it got better.
I actually think I have a fairly common problem for people my size which is that the back muscles get so big they start to separate from the rib cage and it hurts for a few weeks while it heals
@FaheemMitha Debatable, the thing is your body becomes stronger, even your bones and ligaments. So as your progress you can still increase weight in moderation even though the weight you lift would not be moderate for someone without as much training
@Jesse_b Shrug. I think it's still relatively likely to cause injury. For example, if a weight falls on your chest, it doesn't make any difference how much training you've had.
To be clear, I've done moderate weight training myself. And I don't think it's a bad thing per se. Just people get over-enthusiastic. Particularly men.
There are certainly a log of ego lifters that will lift way too much weight because of their ego but I don't suffer from that much (although I certainly have been guilty of it)
I also have my own personal gym in my basement so there isn't really anyone to show off to
Ideally one would do moderate strength training, with resistance weights or otherwise, in combination with flexibility training. But I suspect that's relatively rare.
Most people do one or the other.
Personally I find gyms excruciatingly boring. But that's my problem.
I do a lot of mobility work. My physical therapist was amazed at the range of motion I have in my shoulders, he said it's even better than most people who have never had a surgery but I have had two
@FaheemMitha I would imagine people on the emacs site would recommend emacs over other things, I'd never heard of atomic chrome before just now but it looks cool
@JeffSchaller I once saw a book called something like "Mastering Ed", written by a guy called Ed something (no joke!). I can't seem to find it on the interwebs easily, do you have a link or memory of it?
@overexchange Some of these questions of yours should be on the main site, where people may actually answer them properly, not in chat where you're at the mercy of whoever happens to be here.
it was really good for working with network devices because you could do character and line delays, without that if you try to paste a large amount of information in it would often get corrupted before it goes through
The only other terminal emulators I've found with the same features (for windows anyway) are paid software
@Kusalananda Yeah that is pretty much it. It probably isn't the best way to do it but in my earlier days managing network devices the way we backed up switch and router configs was just saving the show running-config to a text file and if you needed to revert to it you just ctrl+c and ctrl+v it back into the device
the worst was the DOD maintained (and probably still does) this insane ACL that they would distribute on a CDROM and you would have to copy and paste that into all edge routers
Thing was easily 140k+ lines, pretty much all were blocking individual IPs instead of ranges
We actually had to upgrade the RAM in our routers in order to support it
@wildcard I feel like I've made a lot of progress on the checklist, so I'm ready for a reality smack-down! There's still some work to do, but if you'd like to take a look and let me know if I've really gone off the rails somewhere, I'd appreciate it. Take a look at top of the Google Doc we shared for a link to a PDF and a question.
(the latex code is pasted at the bottom of the doc, in case you want to repro locally)