« first day (3269 days earlier)      last day (1678 days later) » 

1:27 AM
@qubert thank you for making that clear. For obvious reasons, that's not welcome here.
 
 
5 hours later…
6:11 AM
@terdon While I (probably) should not butt in here, I'll just point out that this is sarcasm. (Currently getting Big Bang Theory flashbacks.)
 
 
1 hour later…
7:39 AM
@qubert I believe you are insinuating something. Would you mind spelling it out?
 
 
4 hours later…
11:59 AM
I've now slept and woken (I saw @qubert's message at 4:27AM my time), and can answer a bit better. So, @qubert, if you want to have an actual conversation about something, perhaps about how some people are convicted in the court of public opinion based on nothing but hearsay, then that might indeed be interesting. But if you want to do so, you will do so politely and listening to the other side and not by leaving snide remarks and insinuations.
 

« first day (3269 days earlier)      last day (1678 days later) »