@Gilles 12 downvotes on an SO-style non-answer that got massively upvoted from HNQ, and all the necessary delete votes from review and a mod hammer to bury that crap. Whew, there are still people here who care. Thank you, Unix & Linux community!
@terdon Yes. Thanks for deleting it. It is nice that we managed to find 12 people to downvote (and I didn't even post the link in chat so there was no pile-on).
@JeffSchaller SO closed the question anyway. If there are already 3 votes for migration, you can't prevent it anymore, but a mod can. (Except by leaving the question open, but that question shouldn't have been left open)
I want to post on Meta as well, but I'll mention it here in case the audience Venn diagrams don't overlap -- would anyone care if I made a substantial number of post edits in a sitting? It'd fill (flood?) the "Questions/Active" page, so I'm wondering how many people care about that view.
I like to improve the site where I can; one of my (many) SEDE queries looks for common typos. Ideally, I would fill some (smallish) amount of time going through those posts and correcting the typos. When I find posts to edit, I do my best to polish them up the best I can (adding formatting and ot...
Well, he provided a quote for drawing up some plans. I was just asking him for references, because I realised I didn't really know anything about the guy. Though in hindsight I should have done so earlier - before getting the quote.
References are really something you want to get as soon as possible. Because if someone can't (or won't) provide (say) three references, you don't want to spend any more time on them.
I've hired people who turned out to be real disasters. And maybe I wouldn't have done so if I had asked for references first.
Though unfortunately in India, at least, references aren't worth much. Though it's still worth doing.
@FaheemMitha When I was running my business if someone asked for references I would point them to my online reviews, and if they still wanted actual references I would politely decline to work for them. I would never feel right asking one of my previous customers if I could give their information to a stranger
Usually people are willing to give references. Whether or not one can contact the references, and if contacted, are they actually willing to talk to you, is of course an entirely different matter.
Unfortunately people in India haven't entirely mastered the fine art of telephone conversation.
Actually, one problem that arises here is that people don't have a problem giving the references, but tell me that the people concerned won't talk to me.
Those people who go by the acronym High Net Worth Individuals.
You see, in India, people with money are too grand to associate with the hoi polloi. Even to have a phone conversation would sully their delicate ears.
But kidding aside, I can sort of relate. One side-effect of living in a lunatic asylum like India is that if you have money, you tend to wall yourself off.
left wing. Also I think the "raving lunacy department" is debatable. Once you go far to either side you enter that department and hard.
I believe (Mostly hope anymore) that most people fall in the middle somewhere but anyone proud to fall on one side or another is a lunatic in my opinion
syntax error definition (completely opinionated either way): a character or string incorrectly placed in a command or instruction that causes a failure in execution.
I see what you are saying. So I guess not "syntax error" but it is "improper syntax" in that you have arranged things improperly
writing the wrong word is just human error but forgetting a $ when you want to expand a variable means that you have not properly arranged your statement
It has nothing to do with syntax. Syntax is a thing of the language itself, it has no bearing on what the program is trying to do.
> A syntax error is an error in the source code of a program. Since computer programs must follow strict syntax to compile correctly, any aspects of the code that do not conform to the syntax of the programming language will produce a syntax error.
But it is conforming to the syntax. It just doesn't do what the OP thinks it does.
For instance, [ $foo > $bar ] and [ $foo -gt $bar ] are both correct syntax. Using one instead of the other is a mistake in the logic of the program, but the syntax is fine.