« first day (505 days earlier)      last day (3029 days later) » 

01:12
@Araucaria Nicely explained!
01:33
@DamkerngT. Hey Dam, how are you?
@Araucaria Good, how are you?
I'm just look around on SE a bit. :-)
01:51
Suspension ended.
Yay (echo )
02:11
I did steal that there bee, though how Mr. Holmes found out, Mr. G. Scroggins bean’t able to understand. Isn't it a wonderful sentence to describe a farmer ' speech?
Translating Wodehouse.
Oh, lost 's.
 
1 hour later…
03:29
Happy Guy Fawkes night everyone
04:00
Ain't here yet, but happy GFN back to you.
This answer seems to be spawning a lot of sputtering butt-hurt, and I can't really understand why:
12
A: Is "she don't" sometimes considered correct form?

RobustoWhat the other respondents fail to mention is that there is a whole dialect in American English (i.e., black inner-city English), that uses "don't" in the third person singular as a matter of course. Although you can hear that, and things like it, in practically every rap or hip-hop track put d...

 
3 hours later…
06:34
> pI theor./exper.
pI theor./observ.
which is better in a table cell?
The meaning is: the theoretical and the experimental isoelectric point value of the product
 
9 hours later…
15:46
1
Q: Can "using" be also a preposition?

Gayathri Narayan"using" is basically a verb in the progressive aspect. Does it serve as a preposition, too? I can sometimes choose between which and that in a relative clause construction. But in a sentence such as "He found a key, using which he slit open the package", I cannot substitute that for which. Only ...

This is the most thought-provoking question I've seen here in a long time. — StoneyB 5 hours ago
> Only which (not that) occurs after prepositions
Really?
I was just going to say that.
> "I can't substitute that for which".
It's strange.
> He found a key, using which/that he slit open the package
I think both which and that are possible.
Thinking more I think it might not be possible to use that there in that sentence in relative clause structure.
16:55
I was checking the definition of the word "epitome", saw this:
> In many ways Detroit is the epitome of the materialist paradigm, a place where the mechanical worldview was perfected.
Why Detroit? What specific characteristic does the city have?
17:24
@Cardinal It's a major automotive building place
Detroit, the Car City
17:39
Midget is offensive. Dwarf is insulting as well. Is there a common term to refer to people affected by dwarfism?
> In the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia, and other English-speaking countries, some people with dwarfism prefer to be called "little people".[7][8] Historically, the term "midget" was used to describe "proportionate dwarfs"; however, this term is now regarded as offensive by some.
> The terms "dwarf", "little person", "LP", and "person of short stature" are now generally considered acceptable by most people affected by these disorders.[10] However, the plural "dwarfs" as opposed to "dwarves" is generally preferred in the medical context, possibly because the plural "dwarves" was popularized by author J.R.R. Tolkien, describing a race of characters in his The Lord of the Rings books resembling Norse dwarves.
(From the Wiki page for dwarfism)
So dwarf is OK by many. I didn't expect that.
18:17
@CowperKettle nods
> The tragedy acted as a catalyst for a whole series of misadventures which culminated in him running up huge debts and going on the run.
@Man_From_India Shouldn't it be "his"? :-)
@ And also my other friends
 
3 hours later…
20:50
@Cardinal Him sounds right to me, at least in real English. His sounds like strictly prescriptive English (which, IMO, doesn't fit well with the words and style of the whole sentence).
An interesting movie...
Because our protagonist is a linguist!
0
A: you look good vs you are looking good

JustynCorpus evidence brought by tunny is what you would consider by far descriptive and what you need is a prescrpitive approach. I would say the progressive form is rather colloquial.

But where's tunny?!
Some comments must have been removed (and I wish I could still see them!)
21:12
0
Q: Confusion about the usage of 'would' in 'Why would you lie about that?'

Yazdan Samiei PoorI've heard a lot about conditional grammar and how the word 'would' plays a role in those structures, but sometimes I run into this word out of conditional structures. For example : A: I told her a lie about my family. B: Why would you lie about that? I'm confused in understanding such us...

I think we need a canonical post on modal verbs, too.
21:40
-3
Q: I demand resignation of a moderator who deleted my on-topic comments

RathonyI am tired of seeing my on-topic comments deleted when they are not (1) rude or offensive (2) not constructive (3) obsolete (4) too chatty (5) other... This is not the first time that I witnessed comments are unduly deleted by moderators on ELL. I expressed my opinion on why the third link i...

 
2 hours later…
23:38
@Cardinal sorry dude for late reply. Both him and his is fine.
23:54
1
Q: Add-in salt to injury?

user178049I've never seen "Add-in salt to injury" but I know "Add insult to injury" is exist. I had a grammar exercise that asked for the most suitable idiom or proverb for the statement. The question is .. To make something bad become worse. So I wrote on "Add insult to injury". But the answer in the s...

Hmm... scheme. That's an interesting word choice.

« first day (505 days earlier)      last day (3029 days later) »