« first day (243 days earlier)      last day (3293 days later) » 

00:16
0
A: "All of the above belong/s to the statement"

Nihilist_FrostUsually, in multiple-choice questions, all of the above is used alone, without anything following it. This means that every selection above it in the list satisfies what the question demands (in your case, which one in the list was not from the Greek medical period) I have never encountere...

> I have never encountered a native speaker that used
- belong(s) to the statement
ever, period.
@Nihilist_Frost Hehe!
Anonymous
00:44
All can take both singular and plural agreement, depending.
Anonymous
> All of the water is/*are contaminated.
Anonymous
> All of the people are/*is here.
Anonymous
Compare:
Anonymous
> The water is/*are contaminated.
Anonymous
> The people are/*is here.
Anonymous
00:46
It's almost as though all isn't actually the head of the noun phrase.
Anonymous
What arguments could we make to decide whether it is or not?
It works as if a pronoun in all of something.
01:25
@snailboat "Water" is uncountable.
singular
but what about "my heart"?
02:26
@snailboat That's right, it isn't. The head is still water or people. These predeterminers like some/all/a lot of the all work like adjectives in the sense that they do not change the head of the phrase nor influence the number of the verb. That of the isn't really functional: it can often be removed completely, as in all water is and all people are.
> That’s because in English, premodifying phrases such as these act like partitive determiners.
11
A: A battery of tests is/are

tchristTL;DR: Both were and was are used when battery of tests is their subject, including in scholarly publications as shown below. Sometimes the choice of number depends on the intended meaning. There may be a relatively recent trend of were becoming a more common choice, but both are frequent. You...

I have other posts where I talk about this.
> Prepositions on the left?
The only prepositional phrases that modify a head noun but come before it instead of after it are when they are involved in predeterminers such as both of, some of, many of, lots of, a lot of, a number of, a handful of, half of, half a dozen of, and all the rest like those. That’s why we say:

A lot of these problems are easily avoided.
There “a lot of” is something of a decoy, because the of there looks like the start of a prepositional phrase branching right from lot. These quantifying predeterminers are in the position before the determiner slot in a noun phra
2
A: The Order of Modification in English Nouns, Preceding or Succeeding?

tchristBranching, Premodifiers, and Postmodifiers I believe that what you are looking for here is whether a particular structure, in this case a noun phrase, should happen to be a left-branching structure or a right-branching one. English does indeed have both kinds, but there are rules about which one...

5
A: Technicalities about "%"?

tchristLike a lot of, something like 90% of functions not so much as a preposition as it does a premodifier. And premodifiers work like adjectives. They do not change the head noun, which remains the grammatical subject and still must be agree with the verb in number. People are coming. Trouble is ...

 
1 hour later…
03:35
This editor is interesting...
 
3 hours later…
06:39
hey.
Anyone there?
I'm still here, but about to leave.
i suppose, it wouldn't be a good idea to have you engaged in a conversation right now. :P
Okay, then. Catch you later. o/
:D
bye, then. :3
 
2 hours later…
08:20
I just took the first stage of national chem olympiad.
08:44
> Perhaps some vowel reductions
Are caused by oral obstructions,
But Lax, weak, or lenis,
All forms of such wee-ness
Lead only to language destruction!
Just a plagiarism of 3-4 definitions here and there? Come now, you can do better mister spammer. — IͶΔ 46 secs ago
 
5 hours later…
13:37
12 hours ago, by Nihilist_Frost
but what about "my heart"?
@JimReynolds You have a heart? O_o
What then about the Frosted heart?
He has a heart?
Tell me. How does it feel to have a heart?
Is it worth buying one?
I have too much a one, I'm afraid.
Heart Overflow?
13:40
I suffer so for those ungraced with the brilliance gifted upon me.
Yay! I found how to make him suffer @Dam. It isn't garlic, it never was.
Clearly it falls upon me to help light the way.
You are an arsonist.
lol
You have the quick, sharp mind of a paranoid psychotic.
Hullo @Iain! Welcome to LO!
13:44
@IͶΔ !
@JimReynolds @
@IͶΔ Some people don't have very good web search skills at all.
@JimReynolds Who are Web Search Skills et al.?
O.O
I know your interest is for good, but telling someone it only took you a google search to answer their question ... I dunno.
It's not the same as "What does __ mean?" when a simple check of a dictionary will give the needed answer.
It took less?
What are we talking about?
13:49
Oh...
Um. To be, er. soemthing.
To be hoped vs to hope to be? No...
Um. Well, something. Have I made my point?
Give me a link dude. I have no idea what you're talking about.
Couldn't you just say, "I'll try better in the future?"
Respect of elders is important in your culture. I know that.
@JimReynolds No.
Good early morning @Snail!
Anonymous
@JimReynolds Information literacy is a skill that takes a lot of work. Not just learning how to search, but how to tell good information from bad. That's hard.
Anonymous
Good morning!
13:53
I dunno what @Jim is talking about @Snail. Do you?
-1
Q: To blame or to be blamed

Cihangir Çam You were to blame . You were to be blamed. What is the difference between two sentences in terms of meaning?

Anonymous
In which message?
Please do some searching before asking a question. This is the second result of the Google search of "to be blamed or to blame". — IͶΔ Dec 11 '15 at 13:25
Anonymous
I haven't read all the recent messages.
@JimReynolds AH COME ON! That was my most constructive part of the day.
13:55
It took everything you had to write "please", right?
It raises a good question.
My thoughts are: Does everyone have Google?
Does everyone have Google set to English?
What if a person searched for "What's the difference between to blame or to be blamed"?
Should they be blamed?
That is the question.
@JimReynolds Yes.
That's a pretty straightforward search.
I wonder how many questions on the site can be answered quickly after a search?
It doesn't take any Google fu or anything.
@JimReynolds I dunno, half of them? How does that excuse not researching for an answer?
Where is the policy that says "research an answer before asking"?
@JimReynolds The downvote tooltip.
13:59
I'm not so sure we know what standards to apply to English learners in this context.
Lower your standards just like I did. Don't eliminate them.
I don't really want to make a big deal out of it, it's a sincere question in my mind.
:-)
There must be a difference between someone who's just idly curious and asks something out of the blue and someone who's been searching for an answer for days (weeks?).
@JimReynolds See @Jim, I wasn't this brutal until I became a regular at meta.SE.
The difference is obvious.
@skillpatrol Yes, but is it inherently reflected in the question score? No, since they all start at 0 and don't change until we change them.
Actually I commented on my downvote. If everyone did that this'd've been heaven.
14:04
I started off just wanting to raise the question, MAR.
I don't read meta much.
I didn't say you were wrong to write that.
If people are going to get stressed out over some fake internet points they're not here to learn.
@JimReynolds I didn't say you said.
I'm a bit overenthusiastic in explaining this stuff.
I specifically said you should say I never said, and you didn't the once you should have.
@IͶΔ Where did this limerick come from?
You wrote it, or found it?
Oh .... I thought you wrote it. :-(
Write one!
14:13
ERROR 404: POETRY NOT FOUND
ERROR 500: INTERNAL ORGANS ERROR
ERROR 504: POETRY NOT AVAILABLE
I asked a supercomputer "where is MAR's heart"?
It started singing, "Let it go, let it go ... "
O.O
@JimReynolds I saw my heart on the street the other day.
O.O
Where the girl you tried to talk to chewed it out of your chest and dropped it?
14:16
Nope.
Oh.
Listens to sound of computer fan running.
Write a poem about the love you feel within, Mar. That which longs to burst out of you.
Oh, wait. I was thinking of diarrhea.
That's another website I belong to. Medical support group.
14:32
@IͶΔ What have I bought those piles of garlic for, then?!
15:02
0
Q: Structure of "what...waste my waking..."

CYCExcerpted from Araby by James Joyce: What innumerable follies laid waste my waking and sleeping thoughts after the evening! I can't understand the sentence structure above, What at the beginning indicates it's exclamatory, but I don't see the normal structure of exclamatory sentence. Lay is...

What a dative alternation!
I think lay waste to something is more common.
But!
> lay sth (to) waste
(also lay waste to sth)› to ​completely ​destroy something:
So, its alternation could be either lay something waste or lay something to waste.
I guess that a heavy-NP movement is involved in that sentence.
I think just: so many follies destroyed my thoughts after the evening.
What innumerable means so many (that they can't be counted), so: lots of follies.
just like infinity
Yes. It's a certain way to use what
Not a question word.
As in "What strange things occurred that day!"
Are you familiar with that kind of usage, @dam?
What wonderful flavors they have at that ice cream shop.
Yes, the absence of the question mark gives it away :)
What an astute observation, skill!
15:12
@JimReynolds Yes, the sorta exclamative part is common enough.
What! vs What?
But we can write questions that way, too. Can't we!
We can? We can.
Oh, what things we canned from the gardens!
What a can of things!
The can-can
15:17
What? A can of things!
What a thin can.
Word of the Day: plus size
(I guess everybody knows this word.)
Adele describes herself thusly (plusly).
15:19
Ahh
++size
sorta like XXL
Hi @V.V. !
 
2 hours later…
17:26
Hi@JimReynolds
 
1 hour later…
18:46
@JimReynoldsWhy.
@Jim why?
@V.V. If you don't add a space after the ping he won't get pinged.
@DamkerngT. I have never used it.
I have just heard it only recently!
Hi, Mar, Damkerng!
Hi! o/
@V.V. \o
18:51
Mar, I didn't understand
Space where?
BTW, @V.V., I think of you when I see this review: goodreads.com/review/show/…
I know it's a different flower, but it's pretty similar, don't you think? :-)
@V.V. Add a space after you ping people. It should be "@JimReynolds Hi" not "@JimReynoldsHi"
I didn't know.
Now you know. :)
@DamkerngT., it's nice but different.
19:00
@V.V. Yes. It reminds me of you anyway. :-)
Mar, I don't know how to ping you,btw
Thanks, it's nice when someone cares
Let me try, @IͶΔ ooo, I found it
Yay!
I did it?
As I always say, I am technically stupid
@DamkerngT., can I ask or is it late?
Sure, you can ask away.
19:20
I met this: "day in, day out". is it "?every day"
More or less, yes.
It also suggests that the speaker isn't quite happy with it.
19:33
Yes, the context is like that. Thanks @DamkerngT. You are amazing! I am very grateful to you
You're welcome! :D
Good night!
Good night!
G'night
 
3 hours later…
22:23
5
A: How to pronounce "That's the thing"?

hobbsNot really, no. A native speaker wouldn't drop the 's', and it would sound wrong. If you have trouble pronouncing the sounds together, I suggest slowing down and leaving a little bit of space between "that's" and "the" to give yourself a chance to get things right.

It sounds like a good advice but I have a hunch that that's not how native speakers say it in real speech.
I think most of them shift the position of /t/ and /s/ for the second "th" sound when they say "That's the ..."
And many probably simply drop the /t/.
So it could come out as if it's "Thasthe"
Oops! That looks like me, but that's not me!
(Just to be clear!)
22:57
0
Q: The meaning of "In years to come any history of the Supreme Court will"

Ghaith AlrestomStatement of Justice Anthony Kennedy: In years to come any history of the Supreme Court will, and must, recount the wisdom, scholarship, and technical brilliance that Justice Scalia brought to the Court. The bold part doesn't sound very smooth to understand. Could you please tell me wh...

I has been wondering (since I heard the news) how soon an ELL will ask about a passage related to that.
It turned out, it took less than a week.
23:51
1 message moved to Trash
Puzzle of the Day (What does he say Dharma is?): drive.google.com/file/d/0B8KKQ0fwLEZ9QmlVUlZ3bEhDbmc/…
2

« first day (243 days earlier)      last day (3293 days later) »