« first day (373 days earlier)      last day (3161 days later) » 

00:20
It depends what you are trying to say, however consider

work is what you do
The artist's life's work will be on display at the retrospective.

job is when you do it
It's just a job, it's not a career.

It is often used

I go to work at my job.
How is this answer the best complete one to be accepted and up voted?
@Sina It happens often enough on ELL.
It's realy vague!
BTW, you can simply paste just a link and the chat will take care of the content automatically.
For example, pasting this will work: http://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/94730/work-vs-job-in-a-specific-context
This will work, too: http://ell.stackexchange.com/q/94730/3281
(This one is copied from the share link. 3281 is my user ID; yours will be different.)
This will get right to the answer: http://ell.stackexchange.com/a/94733/3281
Let's see the answer:
1
A: Work vs Job in a specific context

PeterIt depends what you are trying to say, however consider work is what you do The artist's life's work will be on display at the retrospective. job is when you do it It's just a job, it's not a career. It is often used I go to work at my job.

@DamkerngT. wow! Seems majical!
Job is "when" is misleading, IMO.
@Sina Yep! :D
00:25
@DamkerngT. exactly!
I guess the OP upvoted it when they accepted it.
Nods.
Anonymous
00:40
@MasonWheeler how it's spelled is much less important than how it's pronounced. If you're one of those miscreants who says it maw-naw instead of man-uh well, i.imgur.com/qJFDOJ2.pngcorsiKa yesterday
Anonymous
Can the commenter really mean /mɔːnɔː/?
Anonymous
I would be quite taken aback at that pronunciation.
@snailplane They said (indirectly) in the comment that "man-uh" is correct, while "maw-naw" (or /mɔːnɔː/) is outlandish.
BTW, good afternoon!
Anonymous
01:38
@DamkerngT. Yes! But can they really mean the latter?
Anonymous
It's hard to imagine anyone saying it that way, but their comment implies such people exist.
@snailplane It's a bit hard to believe for me!
 
5 hours later…
06:55
Geoff Pullum says to add "else" after the who-clause to check if it's interrogative clause.
> Give me a list of who is going to join the party.
With who else the meaning differs.
@snailboat @DamkerngT.@Araucaria
Anonymous
07:12
@TIPS It's hard for me to take pictures! They're so very tiny.
Anonymous
Hi snail and plain :-)
Did u add another to ur inventory? :P
Anonymous
Hi! I'm sorry I haven't been of more help on that question.
Anonymous
Yes, the snails had babies :-)
Ohhh I thought you brought another.
@snailplane no problem. You have always helped me :-)
In that question, JL added some good article in a comment.
It's really helpful, but terminology differs. Reading it I think they are same, just they call it with different names.
Anonymous
07:18
Can you link to it again?
One sec
0
A: relative pronoun after preposition

Man_From_IndiaANSWER TO OP - 1. a list of the players who have been invited. 2. a list of who have been invited. OP asked whether sentence #1 can be reduced to sentence #2. I would say, it depends on context. That who-clause can either be an embedded open interrogative clause or a fused relative c...

The trick of adding "else" is Pullum's own advice. He replied me. Yay.
Anonymous
@Man_From_India Great! :-)
Anonymous
Are you going to incorporate it into your answer?
Ummmm I didn't think of doing it. But now I think. He wrote two-three lines, but that's also very helpful.
If u want I can forward you the mail.
08:15
@snailplane Hi
What's is there in that pic? I mean is it egg of butterfly?
Her baby snails :-)
What I know is snails egg will be white or slightly pink in color
By the way, which state you belong to? @Man_From_India
09:12
Kolkata @ShwetaSekuri
U?
09:30
Hyderabad :-)
 
4 hours later…
13:57
"CPU operations are done between clock ticks and read/writes are done in the ticks to ensure that all components move synchronously and not trample into each other while in intermediate states." sounds like they meant to say "A CPU operation is done between clock ticks and a read/write operation is at (or on) a clock tick to ensure (such and such)", which makes me wonder if they confused CPUs (in general) with (synchronous) digital circuits. — Damkerng T. 1 min ago
Yay! ELL on hardware stuff!
he he
Are you an electronics engineer?
@Man_From_India Well, a computer engineer is probably more accurate.
Ah but it's hardware and software. I guess you are on software side, right?
Yep, but I had to learn a lot about hardware stuff, too.
Naturally or else it's hard to code.
I mean low level coding.
14:01
I'd say it's not absolutely mandatory, but it helps a lot.
I still wonder how printf() or such functions were written?
But one thing I refuse to do is to calculate how many ohms a resister in a circuit should be!
I mean in C language.
@Man_From_India I used to write a small BIOS myself.
@DamkerngT. Is it needed too?
14:02
@Man_From_India If you developed a board, yes.
But it's easier just to have someone else do it for you.
@DamkerngT. It explains your need for understanding of hardware.
I guess so!
In text mode, it's relatively easy. The display interface usually takes care most of the difficult stuff.
I guess that printf() function was written in Assembly machine language. Right?
All the BIOS needs to do is to send the right data to the right ports and do it in the right order and timing.
@DamkerngT. I have no experience in that.
14:05
Then a printf() implementation can simply call a BIOS (either by issuing a software interrupt or making some system call).
right
Ahh I see.
14:15
59
Q: How Do Computers Work?

Rob P.This is almost embarrassing ask...I have a degree in Computer Science (and a second one in progress). I've worked as a full-time .NET Developer for nearly five years. I generally seem competent at what I do. But I Don't Know How Computers Work! Please, bare with me for a second. A quick Goog...

Wow, hmm... that's weird.
"But I really don't understand how you go from a line of code like Console.Readline() in .NET (or Java or C++) and have it actually do stuff." -- Okay!
"Sure, I'm vaguely aware of MSIL (in the case of .NET), and that some magic happens with the JIT compiler and it turns into native code (I think). I'm told Java is similar, and C++ cuts out the middle step." -- So he knew MSIL and JIT.
"I've done some mainframe assembly, it was a few years back now. I remember there were some instructions and some CPU registers, and I wrote code....and then some magic happened....and my program would work (or crash)." -- He even knew assembly!
Oh, but it's only mainframe assembly languages! Maybe he'd never sent anything to any data port.
@Man_From_India In case you want to have some fun ... ;-)
And if you want to have some big, big fun :D (It's the source code of int 10h of IBM PC AT)
14:35
I have done some assembly language coding in microprocessor during my college days. I think those compiled data take help of such language to directly interact with hardware.
This are the lowest level of coding.
@Man_From_India nods -- BIOSs are there for a reason.
(My 'BIOSs' looks funny!)
> The writer and chapters each of them have contribute to are as followed.
(filed under "unnecessarily complicated constructions", which could be useful for @Araucaria's what-makes-a-sentence-difficult question)
14:54
Hmm... I come back in and wonder... how do we pronounce "BIOS"?!
@TIPS o/
15:36
Hi
15:55
So you are software engineer?
@DamkerngT.
Uh-huh
16:19
Oookkk
Am an electronics engineer
If we consider gerunds to be only nouns as did one answer in that question we face this problem. @DamkerngT.
He said
@ShwetaSekuri Nice. :D
> No walking was done today.
So it would say the following is also correct.
Actually I should say half engineer
> No walking your dog everyday is not a good thing.
16:24
:-)
But this one is wrong.
@ShwetaSekuri When you're a full one, I might need you to choose the values of resistors and capacitors for me. :P
@DamkerngT. hehe. Do u really need them?
Yeah sure
Btw she already knows it how to calculate those values.
16:26
I had a look at your previous conversation
The values of resistors, capacitor and inductor depends on your requirement
@Man_From_India I think so. The two walkings aren't quite the same.
You must analyze what result you want.
Well, not now, but maybe in the future. (^_^)
Yeah sure
@DamkerngT. the first one with no is Gerundial noun. And the other one is a Gerund-participle.
16:30
:-)
I once wrote an answer about this.
@Man_From_India nods -- I think you were right in your comments over there.
Or else OP would keep guessing whether to use "no" or "not" because both are gerund and acts like a noun.
That's why just after my first comment he became more confused. Because he has a notion that verb + ing is always a gerund and a gerund is a noun.
Going from syntax to meaning is more confusing than the other way around.
(For example, a learner may get confused when someone just suddenly use a noun as a verb.)
I think here in this case it's because of the limitation of the grammar text books.
16:38
Probably
I am sure in traditional grammar also there is some way to deal with such situations.
But I haven't read it throughly. I am happy with CGEL's explanation.
\o
Eat first @TIPS
Little left MFI
16:41
@Man_From_India I suppose we can deal with it by not dealing with it. :P
@DamkerngT. hehe
Even I want to know one thing
@Man_From_India It's actually quite a common trick among engineers. :-) Like how can we deal with some circuits when all we have is the lumped element model? Answer: We don't. :P
I apologize for not asking properly, we have words Red, Reddish.... is their are some more sort of words
16:44
Or how to deal with non-linear systems when our model is only a linear one? We just pretend that the system is sufficiently linear. :P
@ShwetaSekuri Hmm... what do you mean? I think I need more input from you.
@ShwetaSekuri We also have radish.
Phrase of the Day: probably approximately correct
^Very engineer-ish!
@DamkerngT. try saying similar thing in office :D
@DamkerngT. Potentially almost good.
16:48
LOL
@ShwetaSekuri do you mean to say like this Blue, Bluish or Green, Greenish etc?
extension of those words.
Red, reddish, red (v.), redded
Redder, reddest
Radar
16:54
red, redder, reddest.... hmm. that's what I was asking.
Cool..
In Persian, though, comparatives and superlatives are not said to be different words than the adjective itself.
I would say it's the same in English.
yes....
you are right. I googled it, found the same (adjectives)
thanks...
@ShwetaSekuri I have never seen u in ELL main site, you haven't posted anything yet?
Or r u on ELU?
@Man_From_India he hasn't
16:59
She :-=
You can confirm that yourself.
@Man_From_India Whatevs
On mobile app
I am from Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange.
@Man_From_India Then how can you chat?
Chatapp is there too :-)
The name of this app is ChatSEy
17:02
ChatSEy's good.
Can't you click user profiles on it?
I can but my wifi is too slow today :(
Actually for last few days :'(
Get over yourself. My WiFi is slow everyday. :P
you would have restart it.
I mean router.
@TIPS u r on campus, right? It's always slow.
@Man_From_India Maybe. I call it home though
17:09
@ShwetaSekuri must be some issue from ISP.
@TIPS except my initial days at college hostel I too called it home.
I don't have any experience of hostel....
18:12
in The Periodic Table, 37 secs ago, by TIPS
17
A: Is this double standards?

TIPSFirst, as a disclaimer, I'm an active user in Charcoal, but came in the end, and I'm not partial to either side. Let's see what happened here: You drop in a rather random chatroom in the SE network. Claiming that you can't access SO chat, you asked a question to be migrated from SO to CS.SE. A...

in The Periodic Table, 41 secs ago, by TIPS
Three votes to a reversal.
I should be freaking out but I'm not.
 
2 hours later…
20:08
11
Q: Is "tin foil" for "aluminium foil" deprecated?

shakesbeerIn my native language, the stuff is called "aluminium foil". In English, I always heard people use the phrase "tin foil" for that. I adopted that phrase thinking that despite the foil being made of aluminium (and not tin as it used to be) this is what people call it. Recently a native American ...

Hat on, hat off.
Anonymous
20:23
@DamkerngT. Happens every year!
@snailplane :D
 
2 hours later…
22:42
I disagree with this for two reasons. First, Google translate in most language is too crappy to work with fast conversations in chat. Mix in some dialectal differences, different proverbs and idioms, and sarcasm and the lack of visible tone and intonation, and you get nothing better than confusion. Second, such feature, even used in its best potential, and providing that GT works perfectly, would still disrupt the normal chat conversations. I think in the end you either have to speak English, or talk with someone who knows the same language as you. — TIPS 9 secs ago
@Dam I'm gonna reference that screenshot everywhere.

« first day (373 days earlier)      last day (3161 days later) »