« first day (5141 days earlier)   

l4m2
l4m2
00:48
If you run Windows 3.1 and remove RAM on fly, will it still run perfectly Because modern CPU cache is usually capable of whole windows 3.1?
Ginger
Ginger
only one way to find out!
lyxal
lyxal
01:00
Why you running Windows on an insect.
That's silly even by my standards
l4m2
l4m2
@lyxal not run on fly but remove on
lyxal
lyxal
Implies you've got ram on the fly in the first place
Removing ram on the fly isn't going to impact anything unless windows is being run on the fly
Although I'd also question how the fly isn't being squashed by the ram
Last I checked male sheep are larger than a fly
And can weigh up to 143kg
l4m2
l4m2
Your ram or others'?
lyxal
lyxal
I don't have a ram
Don't live on or near a farm
Nor anywhere you'd find a herd or livestock liketthat
 
1 hour later…
lyxal
lyxal
02:37
usabilitygeek.com/…
try not to be the impostor challenge (impossible)
Seggan
Seggan
02:52
ඞ
 
1 hour later…
l4m2
l4m2
03:59
CMC sequence Numbers that alternate n^2 order and reverse(169 => 196691), in increasing order
 
2 hours later…
New Posts
New Posts
05:49
0
Q: Is using x for × allowed?

LucenapositionIn this question (which is tagged kolmogorov-complexity), many answers used x for ×. I was wondering if this is generally allowed in such questions, since many answers used it.

discussion challenges kolmogorov-complexity

« first day (5141 days earlier)