If we include 3 in the diagram Conway drew, the diagonals excluding duplicates are:
- 9 (obviously not prime)
- 21 (also obviously not prime)
- 49 (looks square, as Conway said), 33 (obviously a multiple of 11)
- 39 (two digits that're multiples of three), 77 (obviously a multiple of 11, as Conway said)
- 51, 91, 121
- 57
This leaves 51 as a potential prime lookalike that could trip up anyone who hasn't encountered it before, 57 as Grothendieck was tricked by, and finally 91 which is the first that could trip up someone with multiple-of-3 automaticity