« first day (4487 days earlier)      last day (652 days later) » 

01:46
I get that this is relevant to SE, but perhaps the Sandbox, or a dedicated room might be better for this? It seems as though every time I check TNB, it's some form of debugging a chat client
i was thinking of a room too lol
If you want to make one, I'd be happy to move recent messages over
Just, maybe in the morning, as it is almost 3am here :P
Alternatively, you could outsource your message moving needs to a third party :p
I will when there's a dedicated room :p
01:52
I'll go handle a few of the hundreds of pending flags we have :P
Who's going to make it?
Also I nominate @Ginger for RO of the new room because they started this whole thing :P
Who's the primary author/dev of this project?
@lyxal Lyxal Analytics (tm): for all your message moving needs!
(also, I'm happy to add whoever y'all want as an RO if you need me to)
@cairdcoinheringaahing theres 4 different projects :P
@Bbrk24 did it alr
01:53
where

 SE Chat Clients

A room for discussion and development of SE chat clients
> CGR
... no
not quite
I picked the most recent one you're an RO of, okay? :P
01:54
bbrk, me, ginger, and mousetail
I was pung?
I heard the noise
its the movement noise
01:56
does chat usually take a while to register that messages have been moved?
did that
cleared my cache too
Shows that 177 messages were moved for me, after reloading
it's still showing some of the stuff that was moved
Sounds like a you problem
Also, SE has been having issues with chat (among other things) recently
01:58
there we go they're gone now
@cairdcoinheringaahing inb4 it's us
Welp, given the recent company development, I won't be surprised at any breaking changes they make
apparently the script for chat hasn't been touched since 2018
Yeah, that tracks
so it's probably not a chat breaking change
sorry, not 2018, 2020
02:01
CGCC challenge: which happens first, Dennis returning or SE touching the chat code?
the latter (it's happened after dennis left)
28th of December 2020
Note: The file in which the error is occurring, master-chat.js, hasn't changed since sometime prior to 2020-12-28, so it's quite unlikely that the thing that's changed to cause this issue is in that file. That doesn't mean SE isn't loading other JavaScript into the page which is resulting in the error, but does make it less likely that this is caused only by the chat page (i.e. it's likely that your networking config, OS, browser, browser extensions, and/or userscripts are contributing to the issue). — Makyen ♦ May 8 at 16:21
Nitpick: That's Chat.SO, not Chat.SE
counter-argument: chat.se uses master-chat.js
the same version as chat.so
21 hours ago, by lyxal
52 mins ago, by lyxal
anyhow, CMQ: replace the script in the elo post with this revision that allows for fracbytes?
because the current script doesn't handle fracbytes or anything where the byte count isn't the last number
and I want to know if i've made the adjustments correctly or if I've missed something
 
6 hours later…
08:29
ok guys so i tell this guy that variable input isnt allowed and he have to do smth like a function instead, then i also tell him there are some golf available that he can do. then the guy takes my golfs into consideration and golfs his answer, nothing unusual about that, but he literally KEEPS the variable input format which i explicitly told him was disallowed
what to do now
Do you mean this answer?
@TheThonnu yes, how u find that lol
I had seen it before you posted the message
and the worst part is that the code he has doesnt even paste correctly, like bruh
anyway post another comment then wait a few days
08:31
u supposed to have newlines between each expression and he dont do that like cmon
if they haven't fixed it by then raise a mod flag
ok ill do that
08:58
bruh there are three dupe desmos answers on this question apparently: codegolf.stackexchange.com/search?q=inquestion%3A36260+desmos
i thought there was only one dupe answer of mines cuz i was checking out jakdad jakdad's posts but apparently i missed the other dupe answer too lol
 
3 hours later…
12:11
I think @RydwolfPrograms edited this answer to change the spelling of their name to “Redwolf Programs”: codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/242018/117478
WOAH MY PHONE SCREEN GLITCHED WHEN I SENT THAT MESSAGE!!!
@PlaceReporter99 Nope, they fixed a github link
@AidenChow two you mean?
13:00
Hello!
@Simd :wave:
😁
I have an array of positive floating point numbers. For each integer k from 1 to n I want to compute the mean all of the values in the array less than k . Can this be done in linear time after sorting the array
If you don't care about possible overflows/loss of precision yes
And how golfed can it be?
@mousetail golfed code please :)
lambda x,y=0,j=0:[(y:=y+i)/(j:=j+1)for i in x]
I think that should work
13:10
Fascinating
Could you explain your use of the walrus please
I have never used it myself
It's just assignment
Why are you using it then?
Basically I'm doing y+=1 and j+=1, where y is the sum of elements in the array upto i and j is the number of elements. Dividing y by j should give the average
Got you
Actually I am not sure it works. Consider an array with all values between 0 and 1
The output should have length 1
No, it should have length k right?
Since there are k sublists of elements whose value is less than or equal to one value in the list
13:16
Let me try again :)
All the outputs should be the same
Does your code give that?
You are right there will still be k outputs
Each output will be the average of a 1 larger sublist, so only be the same if all the elements are the same
Do you have test cases?
If all the numbers in the array are between 0 and 1 then the first value is the mean of the array
The second value is the same as all the numbers are also between 0 and 2
Does that make sense?
Test cases would help
@mousetail let's just try [ 0.1, 0.3, 0.5]
All outputs should be 0.3 I claim
Whereas if the input were [0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 3.1] the outputs should be 0.3, 0.3, 0.3, 1
Does that make sense?
14:13
Can probably be golfed a bit more though
That doesn't look linear time
Oh, oops
Didn't see that
14:44
Maybe it's not easy?
@TheThonnu thanks though
Maybe I should pose it as a challenge?
 
1 hour later…
15:51
Swift's _const keyword -- equivalent to Kotlin's const -- is experimental and it's so obvious if you try to use it
_const let foo = 1
_const let bar = foo // Error: _const let should be a compile-time literal
 
1 hour later…
17:10
@Bbrk24 whats so obvious
That it's half finished

« first day (4487 days earlier)      last day (652 days later) »