@N3buchadnezzar yes; each language has a (currently hidden) property called version which I'm intending to be the guarantee of which version a certain language will always be
@N3buchadnezzar ah that reminds the reason I didn't add a runner for Jelly yet: because it doesn't have options at all, so I kind of wanted to implement a way to hide the options field so people weren't confused by it
well, the question of whether or not he is being unnecessarily rude is still "yes", but I don't know anything about Go to judge the validity of the solution ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
it's just unfortunate that the letter of the rules (albeit accidentally) end up requiring different things for different languages because of the import system in Go
R, 54 bytes 62
library(Unicode)
cat(u_char_name(utf8ToInt(scan(,""))),sep="\n")
Edit: per @flodels comment, I need to read it from connection first, so had to add scan. This is also probably non-competent solution according to all the rules.
Usage
> cat(u_char_name(utf8ToInt(scan(,""))),sep=...
If you think this answer "requires the use of the internet", then so do all the other answers, because oit requires you to download the langauge interpreter/compiler and hence the libraries (which are apparently not external) from the internet
okay regardless of the clarity of the rules or what everyone's opinion of processing invalid answers or potentially invalid answers is, surely this could've been solved if OP explained what pxeger did in their first comment
rather than banning you could just use what the standard rules always are - when using external libraries like numpy, the language name becomes "Python + numpy", and people can just indicate that built-ins or non-standard things are being used. If it's boring, people can downvote. If it isn't, people can upvote. Nobody needs to argue the rules ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I mean we all agree the question was poorly worded / unclear, and the user should have used the sandbox. But that is in the past. X have already happened, now the issue is Y :p
you also can't see any of the comments where all they say is that I have zero knowledge of Go and that the answer breaks no rules without explaining anything at all
@pxeger thanks for the link, it seems Jo should excuse themself from further discussion, as they are not being objective (childish name calling from a moderator)? — Steven Penny52 secs ago
Honestly, it seems like the most annoying part of being a mod is that you can't take any actions without being accused of being powerhungry and overzealous
Which of course, is mostly BS, but it still must be annoying
I'd like to roll up the ability scores for my Dungeons and Dragons character. But I'd also like them to be balanced (and slightly better than average).
Typically, a character's stats are created by rolling 4 6 sided dice, adding together the three highest results, and doing this 6 times. The 6 sc...
as my final word before i go to sleep, i'd just like to note that according to the answerer's logic, the only time they'd explain to me how it wasn't an external library were if I already knew why it wasn't...
As it is cat;shuf -e 1 2 3 is a valid answer (output the three inputs followed by 1 2 3 in some order)
because the first input will always be <= the first input; the second will be >= the second, and the total (first+second+third+1+2+3) will always be >= third
R, 54 bytes 62
library(Unicode)
cat(u_char_name(utf8ToInt(scan(,""))),sep="\n")
Edit: per @flodels comment, I need to read it from connection first, so had to add scan. This is also probably non-competent solution according to all the rules.
Usage
> cat(u_char_name(utf8ToInt(scan(,""))),sep=...
