> Code Golf Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for programming puzzle enthusiasts and code golfers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of programming puzzles and their solutions, with the help of our [Sandbox for Proposed Questions]().
fucking hell, Firefox's spellcheck is awful. It put a red line under survivorship, and I went to edit it to fix the spelling, but it's definitely right!
@RedwolfPrograms Well, I've already found the question I want to nominate for it, so now I'm going to be refreshing meta non-stop for the next 4 hours :P
@ChartZBelatedly Remember about the existence of the tips, you mean? Well as you know, I just went through every one of my regex answers to do housekeeping edits, so I was again reminded by seeing each of the golf tips I haven't researched/applied yet
They're all examples of well-written, well-specified challenges that are easy enough for a new user to just jump straight into, but each of them has a potential failing
No easily visible test cases, more difficult than the others, not an input -> output challenge, very "overplayed"
Plus, Fibonacci has an accepted answer, which (although we discourage it) fits into the Tour
500 rep for \$\pi(n)\$ in unary ECMAScript regex
This is something I've been thinking about ever since 2014, and I haven't been able to get anywhere with it. See my answer to Prime counting function for an explanation as to why I suspect it is impossible.
I will award the highest bounty the site ...
This is a challenge I thought of recently which I think is not hard but allows for a wide range of possible solutions. Seems like a perfect fit for the creativity of PPCG users :)
Your Task
Define two functions which together form a lossless round-trip String × String → String → String × String.
...
I'm watching this video, and the dude basically decides to spent a decent amount of time ripping into URLs which increment the ID for each new post. Like SE does :P
@OriginalOriginalOriginalVI Thanks-comments are discouraged across the entire SE network, and usually considered "not needed" (there's even a flag reason for it). But CGCC seems to be more lenient on them.
I simply upvote a good golf and add credits in the main answer. I'm OK with others writing thanks comments though.