@TheDoctor SO just uses your Gravatar. So I guess Gravatar removed your icon, maybe for copyright infringement?
That is why my Gravatars are pictures I took. Nobody could claim the work as theirs (and I will (semi-)aggressively take down anybody using my icons).
(Exception: I do have a Stack Overflow unicorn Gravatar too. But I don't use that very much any more.) My usual two icons are 1. my face (that you see currently), and 2. my Beachlands gorse picture. I can't imagine anyone wanting to use 1, but I do consider 2 my signature too and I don't want someone else using it.
I took this stance because my workmate has a Fry icon that he doesn't own (obviously, since he didn't create Futurama), and somebody "stole" the icon, but he can't do anything about it because, well, it's not his copyright.
It looks like the specs were changed significantly 10 hours after posting. Either I should downvote the question, or all of the answers that don't follow your new specs. Which do you propose?
If you're going to complain about the quality of questions, you could put a bit more effort into the ones you write, and pass them through the sandbox.
@PaterTaylor Do I have to read the entire question, all 10 comments, the stuff you linked to in the comments, and etc. to understand what your point was?
The question looks solid, but maybe it was poor before some edit?
OH!
He claimed that nobody else has posted a good quality question recently....
First World problem is a slang term used to refer to issues in First World nations that are complained about only because of the absence of more pressing concerns. The term was added to the Oxford Dictionary Online in November 2012.
The term "First World problem" arose in 1995 first used by alt-rock singer Matthew Good from the Matthew Good Band, but gained recognition as an internet meme beginning in 2005, particularly on social networking sites like Twitter (where it became a popular hashtag). The term is used to minimize complaints about trivial issues by shaming the complainer. UNICEF ...
@ChrisJester-Young I also just submitted this tips thread for Julia. I CWed my answer but I don't have the ability to CW the question. codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/24407/…
popularity-contest is the lazy question writers tag. Can't be bothered to write a tight spec? Popularity contest! Can't think of anything particularly challenging? Trivial task with a popularity-contest tag!
@Gareth Re: "Trivial task with a popularity-contest tag!" I understand the "loose spec" argument, but what does question difficulty have to do with popularity contests?
Difficulty can be relative to the tool chosen. A site full of nothing but hard questions would be a site where no one ever takes a challenge as an opportunity to learn the rudiments of a new language.
Right. There's a difference between an easy question and a bad question. Trivial tasks can sometimes be interesting, they're just a lot harder to write to make them interesting. Especially for new users, finding the "accepted" format for questions can be challenging at first.
That's true for SE sites in general, but particularly here, where some of the "normal" rules are interpreted different ways.
Here's a question I think should have an obvious answer when posting, yet doesn't because of lax rules and ambiguous tags. I have a puzzle to post. What tag do I use? code-golf? fastest-code? popularity-contest?
On StackOverflow, if I have a question about thread pooling in Java, I might tag a question with Java, but it really has no bearing on what answers I expect to get.
Here, each tag will bag me a completely different set of answers, and there are no guidelines for picking and choosing any of them
So obviously, new people come here and post arguably bad questions, and then people complain in chat about how many bad questions are posted
I am waiting for someone to create Sandbox 11 before I post my proposed question. ;-)
Right now Sandbox 10 already has nearly 30 posts.
I want to propose reviving my CipherSaber question, which @gnibbler really missed when it got nuked off of SO. (He had some really nice solutions for that, too.)
Haha. Monorails are not popular here, at least in Texas. SC4 had underground monorails. I can't remember if they were present in the vanilla game or added in the NAM mod pack.
Although I think that going underground automatically converted it to a Subway now that I think about it
@ChrisJester-Young Have you been playing a lot? I just got back into it. When I left, it was basically a "max this, this, and this" type of game. I was wondering if it was still the same
@Rusher The highest voted question on our site is 'Print 2014'. The second highest voted question on our site is 'Print 42'. The third highest voted question on our site is an excuse for people to take the piss out of beginners. Is that what we want representing the best of our site? If the popularity contest tag did not exist, neither would any of those questions because they'd've been closed straight away, and the place would be much better off for it.
@Quincunx All the questions on this site involve creativity. A question is created and then answers are created for it. Popularity contest is not about how creative you are, it's about how many people you can make laugh. Perhaps we should get rid of all the other tags, just have popularity-contest questions and change our name to chucklefest.stackexchange.com.
@Gareth I get what you mean now. Previously, I thought you meant "Trivial questions are created with the popularity-contest tag." Now, I understand that you said "Trivial question remain open because of the populairty-contest tag."
The key difference is that "remain open" is the fault of moderators, not the question asker
My earlier point was that poor code-golf challenge are equally likely to be created, but they are moderated differently such that poor questions are closed.
@Rusher No we get trivial stuff for all tags, but with any tag other than popularity contest it will probably be too easy to have a objective winning criterion so it'll get closed for that reason.
@Rusher Yeah, that's pretty much the way I see it.
FWIW, the top-voted questions being trivial is not a phenomenon special to PPCG
for example, these are the top DBA questions: What's the difference between a temp table and table variable in SQL Server? How do I list all databases and tables using psql? Why is Database Administration so hard? Why shouldn't we allow NULLs?
Half the top questions on English are only on top because they have something to do with sex or gender.
I don't regard all popularity-contests as evil, though. I think it is a valid way to objectively decide a contest, and given a well-specified question it can lead to good, interesting code.
Given a well-specified question is the crux of that, and I think Rusher is correct that were our standards for popcons at the same level as for other questions, we'd still have them but they'd be less shameful to mention.
The wiki page for popularity-contest says that good questions encourage creativity. Only a psychologist could really be the judge of that. Programmers are probably as far away from being psychologists as it gets. Just shorten the wiki to "most votes wins", and then abstract out what makes challenge good or bad and apply it to ALL tags. That way, a good challenge is a good challenge regardless of what tag was stamped on it.
@Gareth That's why you need to format your questions so that trivial solutions are not valid answers. It's not hard to set up the criteria so that they don't work.
I am reminded of an old MacOS game where by night you did this psychic combat that was a glorified version of rock paper scissors, and by day you went around the town playing politics to try to gain a strategic edge
@TimWolla Thanks again. I now have collapsible animal rock-paper-scissor arenas! All that's left is to actually write up the challenge without actually including ALL of the code...
@JonathanVanMatre When I worked in minigames I once pitched a puzzle game based on non-Euclidean geometry. Provisional title: Surface of Genus 2.
@ChrisJester-Young I'm bolder than I was, but if I let my heart rule my head I'd close-vote about 90% of questions.
@JonathanVanMatre In addition to questions being well-specified, it's definitely preferable that they take more than 30 seconds to knock out an answer.
@PeterTaylor That's not necessarily a bad thing. ;-)
@JonathanVanMatre Scheme is remarkably difficult to implement well on managed platforms, and some compromises must be made one way or the other. Different JVM Scheme implementations make different compromises.
I want to write an invokedynamic-based one, that will hopefully be fast while still allowing me to implement Scheme to the full (including continuations and tail calls, neither of which are natively supported by the JVM).