« first day (3969 days earlier)      last day (869 days later) » 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 23:00

12:00 AM
0
Q: AoCG2021 Day 11: Garbageful streams

lyxalPart of Advent of Code Golf 2021 event. See the linked meta post for details. Related to AoC2017 Day 9. Weekends are Bubbler's days off from posting these lol A large stream blocks your path. According to the locals, it's not safe to cross the stream at the moment because it's full of garbage. Y...

 
12:26 AM
@Fmbalbuena Unfortunately, Chef isn't really a commonly used language, nor does it have many "obvious" tips for golfing it in, so you were unlikely to get any answers in the first place
 
@NewPosts First time I've used unary output :P
 
Y'all know what's a good idea to do if you buy something that is marketed as the "spiciest option on the menu"? Add more spice to it :P
Totally not dying over here :P
 
12:44 AM
Time to make a question for "Tips for making less spicy in Chef"? :P
 
"Don't add hot sauce to the recipe" :P
 
That's too close to "remove whitespace" :P
"Throw your entire meal into the garbage, no spice left and it's a lot smaller" :P
 
1:00 AM
Sandbox posts last active a week ago: Output sequence from a name
 
@NewPosts Gosh, this is going to be a nightmare in Jelly
 
I'm like 99% sure my math teacher doesn't look at people's homework at all closely, because most of my proofs are weaker than melted cheese and the rest are copied verbatim from his videos from last year
He keeps commenting "Wow. Excellent!" for all my submissions, though, which leads me to think he just looks at the first page, notices it's pretty-looking LaTeX, and moves on
 
Aren't you in high school?
 
since when do people learn LaTeX in high school ?
 
1:11 AM
Since Kami keeps dying on them :P
 
They only started teaching us in uni, and Mathjax is the only reason I knew it already :P
 
I mean, it's not too complicated
 
Depends how complicated you want to make it :P
beamer and tikz make it complicated :P
 
And I assume the reason he thinks my PDFs are "excellent" is because most others just take pictures of their work instead of using LaTeX
 
Why...why did youtube pop up with a box telling me this comment "likely contains personal information":
> Ooh, did that game come out already? I've played the ancient Xbox 360 version, I'd heard about an HD re-release but no date.
 
1:13 AM
@cairdcoinheringaahing I just stick to the basics even if it's super verbose ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
@RedwolfPrograms well now we know they have an xbox 360 and we can make judgements based on that
 
@RedwolfPrograms Are you the HD re-release?
 
@RedwolfPrograms It tells you that person is ancient, which narrows it down to a handful of immortals alive today :P
 
"Call of Dudes" lol
(The video is on WWI creeper tanks, if anyone was wondering)
 
Me at a gay club
 
1:15 AM
ಠ_ಠ ^^
 
@RedwolfPrograms that's when you summon lots of caird clones lol
 
Doubt it, he doesn't look like a plate
 
@emanresuA he's gonna be wondering why some lenny face is now following him lol
 
Wait, that's what your Github pfp is?
I always wondered what it could possibly be
 
1:20 AM
lol
 
I think you mean loll
Can't get complicated if you just don't do it 😎
 
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM Suppose neither a not b are divisible by three. Then multiplying them by three produces... what? Dammit, this is hard
 
3,4,5 is a Pythagorean triple such that one of a or b is divisible by 3 :P
 
1:27 AM
"Assume a is 3, b is 4, and c is 5. Then a is divisible by 3. QED" :P
 
In seriousness tho, I imagine that you assume that a and b are not divisible by 3, then examine the cases a = 3n+1, a = 3n+2, b = 3m + 1 and b = 3m +2
 
I guess so
I started out doing that and then realized I had a whole page of useless stuff
 
Also, pretty sure that if a,b are part of a primitive Pythagorean triple, gcd(a,b)=1
 
What I did. I just started factoring everything without getting anywhere
Oh wow, I actually had 3 pages of that half-baked proof
 
You can assume WLOG that a=3n+1, b=3m+2
 
1:32 AM
Wait how?
 
Imagine swapping them. As + is commutative, it doesn't change the proof
 
What if a=3n+2 and b=3n+2?
 
Then you have 2 = c^2, which is clearly a contradiction
 
(Sorta unfinished)
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing Oh, I think I see (is that modulo 3?)
@emanresuA Nice
You'd have to prove that you can generate triples like that, though, which might be even harder
 
1:36 AM
True, self-containedness...
 
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM Not really. If a=b=3n+2, then a^2+b^2=2a^2 = c^2. Therefore, 2=a/c, which is clearly only true if a=2c. Therefore, c must be divisible by 3 for a to be divisible by 3, but, by our assumption that the triple is primitive, and so a and c are coprime, we have a contradiction
 
Ah
I meant to say "what if b=3m+2" before but let me think about why that's wrong too
 
> Every primitive triple arises (after the exchange of a and b, if a is even) from a unique pair of coprime numbers m, n, one of which is even. It follows that there are infinitely many primitive Pythagorean triples. This relationship of a, b and c to m and n from Euclid's formula is referenced throughout the rest of this article.
 
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM Looks like c^2 would have to be (<something> + sqrt(8))^2 for that
 
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM That's easy: let a = m^2 - n^2, b = 2mn, c = m^2 + n^2 s.t. a^2 + b^2 = c^2. Therefore, (2mn)^2 = 4m^2n^2, which is trivially true
 
1:41 AM
(and the same for a = 3n+1, b=3m+1)
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing I think they meant that all triples can be generated that way
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing I think the issue isn't proving that it generates valid triples but that all triples are generated by it
i have been ninja'd
 
The two are equilivalent tho
 
I was going to say ^ but it's kinda not worth it now :P
 
Let n and m be any positive integers. Therefore, you can generate any valid triple. But, as the constraints of a and b must be met by that relation, there are no such triples that cannot be generated by that formula
 
1:43 AM
wait, what
 
like ik this is true but caird's proof doesn't seem valid to me?
 
Yes ಠ_ಠ
 
I skip like 10 steps in the proof I have, in that message :P
 
Caird's is too golfed
 
1:45 AM
by your proof's logic
 
Sounds valid to me :P
It's certainly stronger than melted cheese
 
let a = 2m, m ∊ Z, and a is an integer. then since a = 2m, a is even. Let m be any positive integer. Therefore, you can generate any valid integer. But, as the constraints of a must be met by that relation, there are no such integers that cannot be generated by that formula. therefore all integers are even
 
The "Therefore, you can generate any valid triple/integer." is where I got lost
 
Basically, we already have that `gcd(a,b)=1`, and so, if `b = 2mn`, `a` must be odd. All odd numbers can be expressed as the difference of two squares (For `m^2 - n^2`, take even `m` and odd `n`). When we take `c = m^2 + n^2`, `c` must also be odd, and `gcd(a,c) = gcd(b,c) = 1`. Therefore, let `n, m ∊ Z` and we generate a Pythagorean triple. However, by varying the expressions of any term to non-trivial variants (that is, any variant that cannot be reduced to the previous given forms), we obtain a contradiction (e.g. assume `a = n^2 + 2nm + m^2` as an example), and so we must have that `a =
It's 2am and my brain is only half-functioning right now :P
 
goto sleep, you're worse than hyper.
(Actually maybe not)
 
1:54 AM
You're brain is functioning quite well for 2am :P
 
As an example for non-trivial variants, consider the case that gcd(a,c)=3 and generalise to any integer gcd(a,c)=n for n > 1
Alternatively, look at Euclid's proof cause that's much less-"fuelled by sleep-deprivation" than mine :P
> As a and b are coprime, at least one of them is odd, so we may suppose that a is odd, by exchanging, if needed, a and b.
SMH, true mathematicians wouldn't waste such a prime opportunity to use WLOG here :P
 
codegolf.stackexchange.com/q/238329/80214 50 rep for a first BQN answer on this
 
2:11 AM
@cairdcoinheringaahing nah, this honestly doesn't make any sense to me, sorry
like i just don't get how it's complete :p
 
The missing ingredient is sleep deprivation :P
 
the wikipedia proof using (c + a)(c - a) = b and then dividing and using rationality to get arbitrary m, n from the triples made sense :p
 
It can complete any mathematical proof :P
 
@hyper-neutrino Yeah, from now on I'm using Euclid's proof, I just thought that my reasoning made sense :P
 
2:23 AM
Ok. So, I absolutely dislike high school English, and the insistence of placing meaning on everything. The idea that every little detail in a book is included "for a reason" - always seemed like BS to me. But. I'm rewatching Great Gatsby, because I love Baz Luhrmann's artistic style, and man. It reminds me so much of what I've maintained English should be: not every novel/book/movie can be analysed to the finest detail. But those that were intended to be, can be analysed forever
 
did y'all ever have to read lord of the flies in high school english
 
Is the movie better than the book?
 
Idk if anyone's watched the movie, but the scene where Gatsby is showering Daisy with his expensive clothes and it turns from a happy scene to one of sadness and loss is just brilliant, and for both the book and the movie, basically every scene is like this. There's so much to analyse, but only because Fitzgerald meant for there to be meaning in everything
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM Idk, they're both very different. Luhrmann puts a lot of his own style onto the movie, so you get more Luhrmann and less Fitzgerald, but that isn't a bad thing
@hyper-neutrino Unfortuantely, yes
 
Mmm, I should try both
@hyper-neutrino No, although I've heard bad things about it
 
it's such a horrible piece of "literature"
 
2:26 AM
I will say tho, I like Leo DiCaprio in basically anything he does :P
 
High school English is 80% Shakespeare for some reason
@cairdcoinheringaahing Memes? :P
 
He's a creep of a guy, but damn, he can act
Kevin Spacey is the same. Holy f, is he a bad dude, but man, I love the characters he plays, and he plays them so well
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM I never got that either. origins of language is an interesting thing to explore, as is the basis of the visual medium of storytelling, but if you want to analyse the adaptation of written/spoken media into visual media, Shakespeare is an awful choice. And if you want to teach students the history of "English", then getting them to read plays won't do that
 
@hyper-neutrino Just read the plot on wikipedia, looks...interesting
 
I think Velay could beat both Jelly + Vyxal at this
Unfortunately, I haven't implemented it
(Or, msot of it)
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing And it's not just Shakespeare, it's a bunch of really old stories that are hard to understand
Of course, old stories are totally alright to teach, but we've got some really good books being written even today
 
2:33 AM
Did you ever study Chaucer? :P
 
For some reason, my Year 8 (7th grade) English class was entirely about Chaucer
 
lol
Oh, the Canterbury Tales guy
 
@emanresuA Nvm, I was wrong
 
That's not even on the curriculum, our teacher just went "Hey, lets learn what English was like in the 11th century"
 
2:35 AM
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM It seems like a fairly normal and possibly even interesting book until the last three paragraphs of that summary lol
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing We once had to analyze a book translated from Japanese for word choice and stuff. Like, it's unlikely the author so painstakingly chose every single word in the first place, and it's unlikely the translator did everything perfectly on top of that
@RedwolfPrograms How tf do you even start beating people to death because you think they're "beasts" and try to murder people just because you have disagreements?
 
Honestly, word choice is the most useless thing to analyse
 
Ooh, A Separate Peace was a messed-up book. So sad :(
 
Think about how much language changes - in 50 years, are kids going to have to try to understand what "sus" means in some groundbreaking literature?
 
I mean, "sus" will probably be phased out pretty soon, I don't think anyone will incorporate that into their writing
(but I see what you mean)
 
2:38 AM
Imagery, tone, style, technique are genuinely unique things between pieces of literature, while still being able to convey different senses and readings of said literature hundreds of years in the future. Word choice depends entirely on the dialect of the time and author
 
I don't know, "sus" could easily survive long enough to start to become gradually more acceptable in more formal contexts
Like, I use it unironically as an abbreviation for "suspicious"
 
At least rn, we're doing Trevor Noah's autobiography instead of a 500-year-old book that takes 3 months to go through. The teacher literally told us the book doesn't really have much to analyze so we're going to do "research" on South Africa and stuff
What's the worst book you've had to read for English?
 
That's my biggest gripe with English literature - there are genuinely things that are worth analysing if you choose the source properly. Some dude's autobiography? Probably not written specifically to be analysed. Anything by Steinbeck, Fitzgerald, Dickens? They specifically wrote in imagery to be analysed by their readers, and so are worth examining
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM Do poems count?
 
Sure, why not? :P
 
Most of these then :P
 
2:42 AM
Oof, having to learn literature for an exam is even worse
 
Again, poetry can be written in a way that it specifically contains subtle undertones worth analysing, beyond just "the author is trying to convey X", but so many sources in English just aim for the basic standards and try to make you find meaning that isn't there, or isn't intended
I maintain that if a meaning wasn't clearly intended by an author, then any analysis of it is essentially worthless
 
Any time something gets mentioned more than twice, you have to think "motif"
@cairdcoinheringaahing I mean, I'm sure tons of works have subtler meanings, but it's better to just kinda point them out and say "hey, this is interesting," rather than write an essay on it
I often find myself just diluting my essays with vacuous nonsense to get my essays to the word count because there isn't actually much to say about the topic
 
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM Not every meaning intended by the author has to be obvious
 
Yeah
With newer books, you could probably look up interviews where someone asked the author "did you mean X here?" and you could maybe confirm that that subtle meaning was actually intended
 
Some of the best pieces of art (by which I mean literature, film, poems, paintings etc.) are deliberately vague, but they are specifically deliberately vague. Examples such as "the curtains were blue" may actually have some significance, despite the meme, but that wholely depends on what the author intended, as can be inferred from context
 
2:47 AM
I'm having to try so hard not to make up some bizzare interpretation, and find all sorts of subtle hints indicating it's the author's intended meaning
 
Hell, 2001: A Space Odessy is one of the most vague endings of any movie I've ever seen. But the ending has so much meaning in it's vagueness that its clear that both the author of the book and Kubrick intended for it to be vague - and so that gives it meaning
However, Transformers has a vague and confusing plot. But, unlike 2001, you can tell that wasn't deliberate - it's just bad writing. There's a difference: if you try to find meaning in Transformers, you'll spend hours blabbering on about space aliens and nonsense. If you try to find it in 2001, you can see the insightfulness behind the concept of life and space exploration being explored in the movie
Chekov's Gun is a brilliant example of this, and a great way of telling if the author meant to include that symbolism in their work; and yet, I didn't learn about it until I heard some meme and looked it up ಠ_ಠ
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing Or just go with the space alien nonsense, in extreme detail, with random background details thrown in conspiracy-theory-style to support your ridiculous claims.
Probably a whole lot more fun :p
 
Idk, that's like taking a maths question and just scribbling out the info given and writing 1+2=7 as the "right" answer :P
 
@emanresuA how many theoretical bytes?
 
3:14 AM
@cairdcoinheringaahing On the other hand, man this is a slow movie
It's already 1hr 30 in, and there's still an hour to go :/
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing just put it on 2x speed ez /s
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing if you want to know the true meaning of slow, watch Satantango
 
YT movies had all sorts of cool stuff for free but none if it's there any more >:|
 
yt still has a lot of free movies left unnoticed by their ai algorithm
 
@RedwolfPrograms make em walk the plank and sail the 7 seas :P (but don't actually because piracy is legally bad)
 
3:22 AM
@Razetime I have a 4 hr 30 min move left to finish that I'm ~1hr into :P
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing which one is this?
 
Das Kapitan
 
my extra long movie vocab is not good enough to know
 
@Razetime Not a fan of piracy myself
 
huh.
das kapitan
 
3:23 AM
@cairdcoinheringaahing I think. Amazon is weird when it comes to German titles, and lists it as "The Captain"
 
wait, which year was this made?
 
Hu, I found this, which lists its running time as 118 minutes
 
whuttt
 
By the plot, pretty sure it's that movie, but Amazon lists it at 3h 58
 
confusement lmao
 
3:27 AM
Literally, same actors, plot, director and title, but 2 hours shorter O.o
 
is it some collection? makes zero sense
i have koyaanisqatsi marked for today
 
I guess I have to watch the Amazon movie to see :P
 
well hopefully it's 4 hours
most 4 hour movies are good
except Zack Snyder's Justice LEague
that ruined my life
 
I have a goto argument about longer movies being better, which is a 12 hour long arthaus film my mom took me to a few years back which was awful :/
It ws literally just 12 hours of this dude painting a tree, as though it was growing
 
oh that sounds bad
i've heard some great things about satantango
obviously there's uhh
the 11 hour "film" paint trying which was made to mess with film approval committees
but most famous long form films tend to be amazing
i've seen
love exposure
an elephant sitting still
 
3:34 AM
@cairdcoinheringaahing b...but it does.
3
 
@Razetime I've found that, up to a point, long films are good :P
 
right now i'm just following this list: letterboxd.com/keyossa/list/reallylongathon
most likely will never see out 1
 
So long as they can maintain a compelling storyline and structure, I don't care how long a film is - hell, I'd watch a single film of the entire harry potter series, if it did that :P
The biggest issue I've found is that longer films tend to lose their compelling storyline after too long :P
 
i can probably sit through that
well, whats a really long movie you've liked
 
I don't know if it really counts, as I'm more of a movie marathon kinda person, but all three LOTR films, back to back, with no breaks (aside from snacks + toilet)
 
3:38 AM
"Ten Hours of Saxophone Chihuahua" was pretty good, amazing character development
 
Lawrence of Arabia - I know, it's a cliche classic, but damn, it's a good movie
 
ah lotr is definitely the best modern example of a well executed epic
 
Peter O'Toole is amazing in anything, as is Alec Guiness
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing i mean does cliche even matter when a movie is that good
 
3:39 AM
i'd say maybe something like mean girls is rated higher than it should be
i should get to it soon
 
Ok, well, see you've just declared war against me with that :P
 
:P
gottem
 
Mean Girls is absolutely not a film that ishould be studied for how good it is, but damn, it's iconic :P
 
well i have it at 4/5 so yes, i like it very much as well
 
like. 2001, Pulp Fiction, Lawrence of Arabia, etc. are films that any director should study and understand as films. Mean Girls is just. Iconic. :P
 
3:41 AM
god i hate 2001 so much
 
eh i just got so tired of it
 
That's a fair complaint. IMO, there are two "valid" reasons to dislike 2001: I disn't understand it, and it was too slow
 
i wanna see tarkovsky's solaris because apparently he didn't like 2001 and made his own take on existential space mightmare
 
Both of which I think are mitigated by rewatching with the intent to appreciate it as art rather than as a film, but they are both valid complaints of it as a film
@Razetime I've heard good things about Solaris, haven't watched it tho
@cairdcoinheringaahing I may be biased, Tarantino, Kubrick, Wes Anderson and Edgar Wright are my top 4 directors :P
 
3:46 AM
I don't find what 2001 tries to discuss to be interesting. Visual after visual, then bare minimum exposition. Arguably a very cool space ending, though.
 
And a special mention to Michael Vaughn for his action scenes, but his dialogue and scripts could do with some work
@Razetime Personally, I think 2001 is one of the best examples of "show, don't tell" taken to an extreme
 
I'd put Hideaki Anno, Mani Ratnam, Akira Kurosawa, Danny Boyle and Satyajit Ray
 
I've never actually seen a David Fincher movie, so I can't rank him
 
Fincher is arguably near the top
 
Same with Kurosawa, but both are close to the top of my list of movies to watch
 
3:49 AM
Akira Kurosawa's movies look like they were made in 2021
his techniques of composing movement with emotion is so brilliant
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing Scorsese, Fincher, Kurosawa, Coppola are all on my "maybe" list, but I haven't seen enough of their films (sometimes, none) to properly judge them
I categorically refuse to pay for movies, unless I'm at the cinema, so I have to go by what's available on the free streaming sites I use :/
 
ah, i see
coppola i've only seen his classic ones
of them i like apocalypse now the most
 
Unfortunately, I will admit that my movie exposure is very Hollywood oriented, and so a lot of the good independent directors are sort of "too out there" for the sites I use :(
 
scorsese is very cool
 
@Razetime Apocalypse Now is the only Coppola film I've seen, and man do I love it :P
 
3:53 AM
godfather is cool, but it's soo distant
 
The Godfather is on my list, and is currently available to me, but my dad made me promise we'd watch it together :P
So I'll get back to you after Christmas :P
 
apocalypse now is visually explosive, the characters are so well represented there
@cairdcoinheringaahing have fun!
 
@Razetime Honestly, I know it's "bad", but I 100% judge a movie on its quotable lines, and "I love the smell of napalm in the morning" is so cheesy, but I'll be damned if it isn't quotable :P
If you can watch a movie once, and still be quoting it in 5 years time, I count that as a good movie :P
 
well if you like quotable movies one of my all time faves is the lego batman movie
 
Oh I've seen part of that
 
4:00 AM
it is perfect
 
@Razetime As much as I dislike CinemasSins, their video on that is great, because half of the time it's them laughing and taking sins away :P
 
4:29 AM
> What is a hotkey? A hotkey is a key that is hot to the touch.
autohotkey looks useful
 
 
1 hour later…
5:53 AM
@cairdcoinheringaahing So, I am very confused, cause I'm 20 minutes from the "end" (i.e. the 118 minute mark), and not only is the plot nowhere near resolved (hell, it's just about getting started tbh), looking ahead the movie definitely continues for the next 2 hours, so idk what's happening
And, doing some digging, I can't find any reference to an extended version
 
inb4 terrible ending that just either leaves a bunch of things hanging or just hastily closes everything off
 
If you make a 4 hour long movie and can't land the ending, what are you doing making movies? :P
 
wait nvm i misread
i thought it ended at 118 mins (wait, what's the 118 min mark then?)
 
I'll tell you in ~15 mins :P
Wait. So I skipped ahead a little bit. And. It looks like the 3hr 58 thing is just. The movie played twice
Like, the 2hr mark is just, credits rolling
 
6:13 AM
tf?
 
That's not the only thing that's confusing. The first 1:30 is about how brutal being a German soldier war, including a dude starving to death, showing literal holocaust "executions" on screen, full "independent film, so we can go there" kinda stuff, then it cuts to some cutesy "dream" kinda thing for the last 15 mins, then to a goddamn musical to close it out
What the hell is this movie? O.o
 
*what*\
 
Granted, it has one final scene after the musical piece about a military tribunal and "this nazi was a bad guy", but still
I've seen some weird movies in terms of tone, but I think this takes the cake O.o
 
6:32 AM
0
Q: drawing lines and points in ascii #haskell #raytracing !drawing

lastsoyce11Drawing Lets define a new data types representing a point and a line. data Point = Point Int Int data Line = Line Point Point Using these types write a function drawLine that creates a view of define lines. The first parameter is tuple (column, rows) defining the size of the resulting view. Left...

 
@cairdcoinheringaahing tone balancing is awfully difficult
you might even be seeing some sorta uncut version
those tend to have weird breaks in continuity
 
@Razetime No, I skipped forwards through the next 2 hours, and its exactly the same thing
 
oh well
 
@NewPosts OP posted this on MSE a few hours ago
 
that is very odd
 
7:29 AM
5 hours ago, by Razetime
https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/q/238329/80214 50 rep for a first BQN answer on this
reminder that this offer still stands
 
7:50 AM
Otherwise I cloud flex with °$eøḋ in Vyxal for -10
Or °$e with some buy fixes for -12
But no, built in complex arithmetic is banned :(
 
Why not just make S stringify as decimal?
 
8:07 AM
0
Q: ASCII Draw Lines

lastsoyce11This challenge will behave more or less like a traditional code-golf. The only difference is that instead of scoring answers by their number of characters or bytes, users will assign weights to different characters in the comments and the program with the lowest cumulative weight will win. Challe...

 
oh, did nobody refer them to sandbox?
i'll do that
 
You should really sleep, it's 3am. I still don't know how you can do AoC at all at midnight, much less get 1/1.
 
i don't wake up very early lol
 
As in...
 
like, 10 or so, lol. sometimes later
though TBH i'd wake up later if my parents didn't wake me up. if i lived alone i'd set my alarm later than my parents wake me up but i don't really mind cuz i'm tired when i first wake up even if i sleep in and i'm fine later in the day even if i get up early anyway, so might as well get the extra time
yes, I am aware that sleeping for longer for one day doesn't fix years of sleep deprivation
 
8:19 AM
then what fixes it?
short naps?
 
no, fixing my sleep schedule lmao
oh well. one day i will ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
¯\_(×_×)_/¯
 
@NewPosts dang it I can't even vtc it because of SEs technical debt repayments
 
Wdym?
 
When they updated their site to use modern js stuff, they broke support in some browsers
Ddg for Android just happens to be one of those browsers
Imma gon have to ask on meta se about this because DDG should be a new enough browser.
 
8:34 AM
ಠ_ಠ
 
And also the footer is still broken
On ddg that is
 
dukdukgo?
 
Correct
 
8:50 AM
it's not on the supported browsers list tho
maybe there's an argument that it should be, but if it's not on the list, basically you can't expect anything to work :p
 
 
3 hours later…
11:26 AM
TIL things can be so repetitive that you can see the repetition once it's gzipped
 
the new profile page looks terrible in widths of 1100 or less
 
12:03 PM
Fun challenge for anyone who wants to try, I should sleep now
 
12:14 PM
0
A: Sandbox for Proposed Challenges

lastsoyce11ASCII Draw Lines This challenge will behave more or less like a traditional code-golf. The only difference is that instead of scoring answers by their number of characters or bytes, users will assign weights to different characters in the comments and the program with the lowest cumulative weight...

 
1:05 PM
@hyper-neutrino wait i thought you were in college
A big selling point of college for me is not having to live with your parents :p
 
 
2 hours later…
2:40 PM
0
Q: Query google trend using google BigQuery

Alvin MasievuI need help with google BigQuery. Am using big query to query data from Google Trends. now I want to get data using a specific keyword example spiderman, and get the result in regions like CSV downloaded in google trend "interest over time". But google trend has this code only view 25 top-trendin...

 
 
2 hours later…
4:54 PM
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM I am
thing is my parents encourage me to not move out (I have discussed it with them a few times already and actually was planning to move out and live either on campus or in like an off-campus apt. or something with my friend)
and they are right that it's cheaper (tuition ain't cheap :c) and it's just a lot more convenient (like, I don't need to worry about utility bills, food, laundry, etc. I just help out with stuff but it's nowhere near as much work as if I lived alone)
TBCH, I'd rather not live at home for many reasons, but especially during the pandemic, I think I'll just stay like this for the forseeable future - if I get a co-op outside of my city, I might need to move out, and so that'd be my chance to do so
 
5:41 PM
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM I tried to go as far away from my parents as I could with uni, which isn't great as they live in basically the exact center of the UK :P
I'm about 3hr30 drive away from them, which in the UK is a long drive
 
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM This was a really interesting one. Here's the proof I came up with:
Lemma: For any integer n, n^2 is congruent to either 0 or 1 mod 3.
If n = 3k, n^2 = 9k^2 which is congruent to 0 mod 3.
If n = 3k+1, n^2 = 9k^2 + 6k + 1 which is congruent to 1 mod 3.
If n = 3k+2, n^2 = 9k^2 + 12k + 4 which is congruent to 1 mod 3.
Main proof: Suppose a^2 + b^2 = c^2. Since a, b, c are a primitive Pythagorean triple, a and b cannot both be divisible by 3, since then c would also be divisible by 3.
Now suppose neither a nor b is divisible by 3. Then a^2 and b^2 must both be congruent to 1 mod 3, which means their sum is congruent to 2 mod 3. But a number congruent to 2 mod 3 cannot be a perfect square, so a^2 + b^2 ≠ c^2, a contradiction.
Therefore, the only possibility remaining is that exactly one of a and b is divisible by 3.
 
oh that's actually surprisingly elegant and simple
a lot better than messing around with the m,n triple generation proof that we did yesterday :D
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing Your opening statement reminds me of this Madeleine L'Engle quote (about Chaucer, coincidentally).
 
6:12 PM
@HALPDAMODS11'DMYNAM I don't know about "worst"--I just remember the ones that left me mildly traumatized :P
The short stories section of one of my HS English textbooks led off with Leiningen Versus the Ants and then continued with The Monkey's Paw and The Demon Lover. I guess the editor must've liked horror lit. I sure didn't.
 
6:31 PM
Yay, my laptop was running Minecraft incredibly slow, which was super confusing given the specs. I put it on top of some books, turned all the battery saving and fan quieting stuff off, and now it's smooth 60fps :D
 
where was it previously, on your bed or smth?
 
On a desk, but the laptop has a really awful design airflow-wise (since everybody apparently loves super thin laptops that also double as electric stoves)
 
ah :/
 
6:58 PM
@cairdcoinheringaahing *centre of the UK
 
@DLosc Oh nice, that's very short and easy to understand
If only I had asked TNB for proofs when we were still doing numbers :P
 
7:30 PM
My sister's taking care of a neighbor's dog, so it's in our house, and both of our cats are terrified of it
Except neither of them know how to growl
So Scully's making this weird half-growl-half-air-raid-siren thing, and Stormie's making this long drawn out "meeeeep" noise
 
Time for a dogs vs. cats fight :P
 
Oh Scully would win for sure
She's a nice little floofball when she's happy but I'm pretty sure she'd kill someone if she felt like it
 
And you keep this creature in your house?
 
She's never mad at humans
Only dogs and sometimes Stormie
 
Racist cat :P
 
7:35 PM
This is Scully:
Stormie is the funny looking cat
He never learned how to meow
 
this is lenna. She's obviously not the sort of cat you can mess around with :P
just look at those killer claws
 
That's a confusing perspective
 
the reason her eyes are closed is that she doesn't need them. She is an elemental cat. Her chosen power is JPEG artifacts. She summoned the ones in the picture. If you try to mess with her, she'll repeatedly compress you until you're a grey blur.
5
 
I think those are low lighting level artifacts
 
naturally she can control the lighting level
 
7:47 PM
Wait, so you're a wezl with a pet cat?
I thought cats ate wezls
 
did I ever say she was my pet :P
 
Do you run a cat prison, wezl?
3
Did these cats attempt to eat other wezls?
 
anyway, why would she eat a furry weasel when she can summon JPEG artifacts for food?
we just live together. I'm her ambassador to the TTNB
 
JPEG artifacts sound like an unhealthy food
Although I suppose they'd make you lose weight
 
lol
they taste just like normal artifacts
 
7:52 PM
Those also don't sound particularly healthy, especially if you live somewhere where arsenic bronze was a thing
 
this is listed first in the wikipedia disambiguation page for artifact, so it must be the normal type of artifact
there's also a reason this is in the compression artifact page, which is that cats are the most common source of artifacts
 
Legend has it a sonic artifact is blue and runs really fast
 
so fast that you can hear it but not see it
because sound is definitely faster than light
 
Maybe it's like a quantum mechanical thing where all the light cancels itself out because your cat knows how fast it's going
 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 23:00

« first day (3969 days earlier)      last day (869 days later) »