« first day (2379 days earlier)      last day (2463 days later) » 

12:01 AM
@Downgoat it has 1 semantic meaning which is "i have no idea what you said pls explain"
 
@ASCII-only oh ok. this is what I said:
5 hours ago, by Downgoat
@ASCII-only do you have any time to get your branch for VSL? After (californias) Saturday I won't have any free time for many months
 
simply said, it's confusion
 
This is English, a grunt can have a huge amount of semantic meaning.
 
@ATaco goats don't grunt so 0/10 inapplicable
 
12:03 AM
although i am opposed to multiple question marks
 
They do scream however.
 
what is this???? supposed to mean?????
bleat
 
Bonus points, Caret has basically no meaning other than "Yeah I agree"
 
that's different
 
^
 
12:04 AM
@ATaco see that sentence has a subject and a verb but ? only has a connotation which is a seperate context from strict semantic interpretation
 
I'm glad I don't do professional language analysis.
 
but you do recreational language creation
 
😏
 
@Downgoat yeah idk how to get my branch
 
@ATaco oh god not the 😏 emoji
it is worst emoji. Compare:
 
12:06 AM
how about the 😎 emoji
 
> Hey
> Hey 😏😏
 
👉😏👉
We lack a true finger guns emoji, it saddens me.
 
anyways this is the kick threshold
 
@ASCII-only I thought it's on C9?
back on-topic: this answer:
22
A: Do submissions have to be answered with a programming language?

Nathan MerrillAnswering in non-programming languages is allowed The best challenges are written in terms of input and output. We avoid Do X without Y challenges because the Y is usually not defined in terms of input/output. Disallowing non-programming languages is like disallowing arbitrary classes of langu...

has 22 upvotes
 
0
Q: Party Tricks with Random Number Generators

CharphacyThe website pcg-random.org (different meaning of PCG!) has a section on Party Tricks where you rig up a seed-state for a PRNG that produces some output you desire at some point in the future. Your job is to do the same with some other random number generator. In theory, such states can be found...

 
12:09 AM
but this one:
68
A: What are programming languages?

Peter TaylorMy previous answer was criticised for not drawing a line in a sand, so following some discussion on chat I propose a line. Executive Summary A purported programming language should be accepted as such if and only if it is capable of addition of natural numbers and primality testing of natural n...

has 68
so I would naturally think the latter one takes precedence, no?
 
here's an amazing idea: make another meta post to solve the confusion
lel
 
Question: are mod decisions like court rulings where they set precedent I can use to in new claims?
 
i'd hope not
 
0
A: Sandbox for Proposed Challenges

Bruce Forteprepend,append-Sequence The prepend,append-Sequence is defined recursively, like this a(1) = 1 a(n) = a(n-1).n , if n is even a(n) = n.a(n-1) , if n is odd where the . represents an integer concatenation. So the first few terms are: 1,12,312,3124,53124,531246,7531246,... Your task is, gi...

 
@WheatWizard Have you considered selecting a nomination for the Biweekly Contest for Undervoted Answers?
 
12:21 AM
Oh I choose?
I'll look at them tomorrow
 
Alright.
 
12:37 AM
Which language was the first to do ** for exponentiation?
 
probably Python
 
I was looking at this and I noticed Ruby and groovy did the same thing
 
CMC: Output 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 16, 22, 29, etc. May output infinitely or up to the first n values, where n is input.
 
So by fixing Cubically's issue (loops don't work when EOF is the last character but are fine when it's anything else), I swapped it. Loops work on EOF but not when the last character is anything else. FFS I'm done
 
12:43 AM
Wow that is really horrible
Is BeanShell itself any good?
 
The word "Homeowner" contains the word "Meow"
9
 
@MDXF It was the closest thing to a Java REPL until Java 9.
 
@Pavel Jelly, 4 bytes: Ḷ+\‘
I actually came up with that solution in like 30 seconds, but I couldn't type it on my phone, and then I lost my phone, so it took way longer than necessary
 
Hah
 
@DJMcMayhem >_> <_<
@flawr but gists onebox (although they do so terribly)
 
12:52 AM
@Pavel wait are you Pavel/Phoenix? Both your avatar and username are different...
 
Ruby:
i=1
j=0
while 1
p i
i+=j+=1
end
@totallyhuman What makes you say that?
 
Ooh, this would be great in brain-flak
 
Is the OEIS challenge rip?
 
@Pavel eh i've seen sites that are >10x worse
 
@Pavel Brain-flak, 34 bytes: ({}<(())>){({}<(({})[])>[()])}{}{}
 
12:57 AM
@Pavel NVM, looked at your profile and recognized a challenge. Thanks for being cryptic though :P
 
Yeah, I decided I should go back to my actual name.
 
Ooo, MaybeLater would be great at this
 
0 indexed is much shorter: {({}<(({})[])>[()])}{}{}
 
when i is *{
	print i
	i = i + j = j + 1
}
j = 0
i = 1
 
All spaces neccessary?
 
12:59 AM
Nah, I just like adding them for readability
Let me golf it
 
Yeah
I started it again from scratch and everything just worked better this time.
 
I feel kinda proud of myself for digging up something from that many months ago.
 
It takes Optional Whitespace to a whole new level.
 
> moths
 
1:03 AM
> Not frogs
 
What happens if there are two when blocks listening for the same thing?
 
They get executed in order of writing.
 
Not threads?
Also, documentation when
 
Documentation later, and threads would make it needlessly confusing.
 
@ATaco I think making it use threads would be more intresting.
 
1:07 AM
Yeah, but not nearly as logical.
 
Anyone up for contact?
 
Yes
@ATaco Maybe add an option?
 
The scoring system of:
-4
Q: Party Tricks with Random Number Generators

CharphacyThe website pcg-random.org (different meaning of PCG!) has a section on Party Tricks where you rig up a seed-state for a PRNG that produces some output you desire at some point in the future. Your job is to do the same with some other random number generator. In theory, such states can be found...

 
Nah, I really don't feel like trying to deal with making that work.
CMC: Given an answer, score ^^
 
ರ_ರ
 
@totallyhuman That soulless ಠ_ಠ is concerning me.
 
Good
 
ರ_ರ
I like it
@ATaco pls add to chat commands as /O_O
 
1:30 AM
is it better to store a list of primes, or recompute them?
I would be recomputing them a lot
 
Store the list.
Generally, Memory is much more disposable than CPU time.
 
@ATaco okey dok, thanks
 
stephen are you working on the oeis thing?
 
@HusnainRaza no that's way beyond me
 
rip :c
 
1:41 AM
It's way beyond anyone, I'm telling you...
 
the oeis challenge seemed like fun, but most of the time it just ends up seeming impossible
> semeing
 
memeing
 
@totallyhuman no it's because the most recent one is seemingly invalid
Oh hi @cairdcoinheringaahing (I know you can't talk D:)
 
Er, no it isn't
 
Edited
 
1:50 AM
How many times do I have to tell you to stop complaining about A000236?
1
A: Explanation of OEIS:A000236 - Residue Classes

Max AlekseyevThe answer of @EpsilonNeighborhoodWatch is not quite correct. First, it makes an impression that prime $p$ is selected independently for each pair of $x,y$, while in fact prime $p$ should be the same for all elements $1,2,\dots,m$. Second, the $n$-th power residue class is defined as follows. T...

 
Does this answer not prove that it is possible to compute the sequence
 
@ppperry of course it is (btw he contributed a lot of the oeis entry)
 
yet MD XF keeps calling my answer seemingly invalid ...
 
Seemingly != invalid
It just seems near impossible
 
1:54 AM
@ppperry which answer
 
no, it isn't near impossible ...
 
@MDXF ok what
 
Do I really have to repeat this ...
 
how did that guy that answered the question do it in 2005 then
 
1
A: One OEIS after another

ppperry96. Common Lisp, 236 bytes, A000478 (defun power(m n) (let ((result 1)) (dotimes (count n result) (setf result (* m result))))) (defun solve(n) (+ (- (/ (+ 7 n (* (+ 6 n) (+ 6 n))) 2) (* (+ .5 (/ (+ 6 n) 4)) (power 2 (+ 5 n)))) (/ (power 3 (+ 6 n)) 6))) Try it online! Som...

 
1:55 AM
@ASCII-only It has taken people like three days now
 
@MDXF ... yes, only because the OEIS entry is confusing
 
Yes, and I'm asking, is there any proof that it's even possible?
(If there is then I'm fine with that)
 
@MDXF ... pretty much every sequence is computable what do you mean
 
not true
 
I'm saying is there proof that the sequence is not just made up by someone in OEIS?
 
1:57 AM
@MDXF No? Does it matter if the sequence was made by someone in OEIS?
 
If this sequence were made up, then how could @EpsilonNeighborhoodWatch explain it
and I almost certainly spelled that username wrong
 
@ppperry looks right to be
@MDXF because someone (not the author) calculated 8 more terms?
 
> This answer is not entirely correct, as pointed out by @HyperNeutrino. I don't know what the correct reading is so I will leave this up for posterity.
...he didn't explain it properly
 
"Not entirely correct"
 
@MDXF well yeah because it's confusing, the other guy explained it
 
1:59 AM
If the other guy explained it perfectly then why has it not yet been solved?
 

« first day (2379 days earlier)      last day (2463 days later) »