« first day (82 days earlier)      last day (416 days later) » 

user116848
20:00
No, that is downright unfair.
@Arrowfar If you want their friendships, just be friendly with them. I'm sure they won't leave you.
user116848
@DamkerngT. Why are you welcoming others there?
Everyone is welcome to read.
It's a gallery room.
user116848
No, everyone can talk there I can see it. And all those people know me, You have given me a bad name here man. It is sad what you doing.
Have you checked the room stats? I can assure you, not everyone is allowed to post there. Please be reasonable.
user116848
20:04
All regulars are there. I know Freddy is not allowed there but he doesn't talk much anyway.
Hello.
user116848
Hi!
Hello, @hichris123!
@Arrowfar So Freddy is not regular here?
Let me ask you this, if someone wanted to move into your house, would you let him?
user116848
@DamkerngT. He doesn't talk much. Check his posts. I like to chat.
@Arrowfar Yes, you indeed like to chat.
user116848
20:06
@DamkerngT. Don't go all coy with me please. It is getting offensive.
sigh -- I think this is not going anywhere. I'll let you think it over. Try to be reasonable. I hope you will understand.
Also, please avoid saying that kind of thing about me. It's not very nice.
user116848
No you be reasonable please. You don't like me and everyone knows that.
It's really offensive, and it's not true.
user116848
Ditto.
@Arrowfar No. It's not that I don't like you. I dislike what you've done.
user116848
20:09
Same here.
user116848
I dislike what you are doing.
Alright... stepping in here for a minute.
This conversation seems to be going nowhere.
You both have grievances with each other.
It's okay for gallery rooms to not allow everyone in. That's the point.
Badgering people to let you into the room doesn't help.
But that doesn't mean that both of you can't be nice.
In the FAQ:
> Yes. We expect community members to treat each other with respect … even when they don't deserve it.
It's okay for you to dislike each other. But neither of you should dwell on it, nor should you spend time arguing with each other.
I unignore him for this discussion, hoping for the best.
It's been getting more and more like arguing in the latter part, I believe.
Honestly, IMO, if you can't interact without bickering, maybe you need to chose a different room. Whoever is the owner of the room in question can determine who is allowed in that room. If you don't like it, find a different room.
I'm the owner of this room, and the other room.
user116848
20:15
Fair enough.
user116848
It is his choice then.
I'm fine with him being here.
user116848
I'll stick to other rooms.
I rejected his request to join the other room.
What's all this noise? We'll have no trouble here.
user116848
20:16
Hi Richard.
@Richard I don't know. Tell me about the noise. :-)
user116848
@DamkerngT. But no one talks here. So I'll suffer the punishment then. Well okay.
I would suggest that another room owner should be added. Of course, that's not my decision, but I think having a sole room owner is a bit... problematic.
(I'm referring to this room, not the gallery one)
user116848
Yeah add another room owner please .
@hichris123 I resigned from one room before, make this one, hoping that the conflict would be subsided.
@Arrowfar That's pretty much like the first time you invited Shog9 here.
You asked him to remove me from being a room owner. He did not. Anyway, I chose to resign to avoid possible conflicts.
I don't mind resigning from being this room's owner either.
user116848
20:19
I didn't ask him that.
Oh, you did, indirectly.
user116848
Please stop it.
But that's not my point. My point is being a room owner is more like a burden to me.
Focusing on blaming people for what they did in the past isn't going to get you anywhere. Future tense, please.
Obviously you two can't be in the same room with out arguing. Neither of you seem to be very mature about it. Just use different rooms and there shouldn't be an issue.
20:22
@TinyGiant I'd recommend you to review things from the beginning. This is the 2nd room. The gallery room is the 3rd room. I don't want to create one more.
Here was where I came in in this discussion:
2 hours ago, by Damkerng T.
sigh -- I don't know if this will turn out to be another bad decision. I hope it will not.
user116848
@DamkerngT. Creating new rooms isn't gonna solve anything. You are just making matters worse for some people (like me)
user116848
I am saying this politely.
@Arrowfar Why is it always about you?
That is a rhetoric question.
user116848
Spare me the rhetorics. I am a regular user of ELL that's why.
Okay, when was the last time you discussed an ELL question here?
user116848
20:27
Yeah I don't always discuss grammar. There are no restrictions here. Everyone talks freely. I never interrupt. No one complains about me but you
Ok, you are both continuing to bicker. A chat room is a chat room is a chat room. If the owner of that chatroom decides that a user is not welcome then that is their prerogative. There are thousands of chatrooms on the Stack Exchange network. Why would you want access to a room where all you're going to do is fight and argue? You both need to move on and take a break from trying to interact with each other
This seems to be something of a rolling argument. Under normal circumstances, I'd be minded to close the room temporarily to allow you both to think about it.
@Richard I would tend to agree
user116848
@DamkerngT. People crack jokes here left and right all the time and talk about zillions of stuff. You are just mad at me as simple as that.
Be Nice—we have a policy. Please follow it.
2
20:29
First I'm not mad at you, at all.
I unignore in hope that we can talk and clear things up.
My main reasons for not allowing you to have write access in another room are very clear.
I think I'd better turn the ignore on again.
user116848
Do it.
I was about to do that, but the mods came in first.
I'd better let the mods give their suggestions. @mods Please ping me if you want to say anything to me.
@DamkerngT. Suggestions? Step away from your keyboard. Two hours is way too long to spend arguing over trivial matters like this.
@Doorknob Thanks. Indeed!
@Doorknob - Agreed.
This room was placed in timeout for 10 minutes; the topic of this room is "A place for learners and non-native speakers of English (along with native speakers and teachers who want to help these people) who are on their own quest of mastering their English." - conversation should be limited to that topic.
Out of control argument. Please all take a few minutes to think about the Be Nice policy
20:49
What in the world of. . .!
Then I'm called the immature one here. :(
I again left @Arrow and @Dam alone.
@M.A.Ramezani It's alright. I wasn't able to solve this out myself.
Hullo!
@HarryCBurn Hullo!
Ooh, more drama? :(
@DamkerngT. You guys kept ignoring me.
20:51
@M.A.Ramezani I did not. If it seemed like I did, it was because I was busy with some other thoughts during the conversation.
You didn't realize what benefit could've been to a third person here.
Well, what can I say now? :-)
@Richard Sorry for bothering you; I should've known this would happen.
Frankly, I thought you were the one who invited the mods here.
Crud! We even brought @HDE here.
20:52
I don't know any mods (in the room), but maybe you do.
Hey, why did they even come in?
@DamkerngT. I was praying.
@M.A.Ramezani Stealth mods!
It could have something to do with the discussion in the Tavern On Meta
Alongside my family, I was doing a religious praying tradition thingy.
@TinyGiant What happened there?
@TinyGiant I see.
20:54
Arrowfoot brought up this discussion there
user116848
@M.A.Ramezani Yeah I went to Meta.
Umm, this is so bad.
@TinyGiant Then, I'd like to suggest reading this: frankviola.org/2012/02/10/onesideofastory
@M.A.Ramezani I saw a flag, and this was mentioned somewhere else. I came in to see if I was needed. I don't think I was.
I don't know what he's talking about me over there. I don't want to read it. I think it's similar to what he said in other rooms.
20:56
Am I the only one who thinks you guys acted childish? @Dam @Arrow? (With all due respect, even if this phrase is typically seen before fights)
@DamkerngT. I was not agreeing with either side.
@TinyGiant Good! That's all I hope for.
Ok, please drop this. We don't want to continue with the past behavior
Yes, that's the sane act.
@M.A.Ramezani Well, I have a few requirements for joining the gallery room. I think you can guess them.
20:57
THAT I'VE BEEN TOTALLY TELLING THESE GUYS. AND I AM SHOUTING!
@DamkerngT. You were right to make another room for this.
I think @Arrow was wrong to think it was a punishment for him.
nods
I feel a little sad that this room is used just like the main room. I was hoping to use it for other purposes, the purposes we helped draft together.
But that's the best we can have right now, I think.
@DamkerngT. Perhaps general chat should best be kept for an outside group on say, Kik or something.
At least that would keep the off-topic arguments at bay.
General chat? Like here in this very room?
I'm not sure since when, but this room has gradually drifted away from its original goals into a general chat room.
I'm going to stick around for a while to help keep this room from becoming destructive as it did before.
But our attempt in trying to bring in long-term learners here wasn't very successful either.
@TinyGiant I think you don't have to worry about that. I've put the ignore on already. (I shouldn't've turned it off.) But everyone is welcome here, though. You too.
21:05
@TinyGiant Thank you! My presence here will be shifty. . . So I'd just leave for now. Maybe I should take a break as @snailboat sometimes does. I was really unhappy to see spoiled-over milk rather than a handshake.
Sorry @HarryCBurn, I think I'll leave too. Hope to see some more hardware projects from you soon. :-)
@DamkerngT. Yeah, and some other group chat could prevent that.
I still remember when the ELL rooms where used to help ELLs ;p
I don't know if it will help much, but I've created a general chatroom, The Tavern on ELL if the idea is to keep this from becoming a general chat room then the best solution is to create an open general chat room
@DamkerngT. Got one on the way :)
I'll cya' around, maybe tomorrow c:
@TinyGiant Well, ELL was meant to be general chat, and this was to be the helping room.
We can all see how well that went ;p
Damn, its not on the right site, because I don't have enough rep on this site it moved to SO
21:08
@DamkerngT. I'm always up for it if you need someone :)
Just mentioning it.
@TinyGiant It looks orange. :-) I agree with HarryCBurn about the room.
If there is a general chat room then it should not be a gallery room, otherwise it is not a general chat room and everyone will generally chat in the open room
@TinyGiant What, you made an ELL site on SO? :p
@TinyGiant Ah, the gallery room is not any ELL room.
No, I tried to make it on ELL then it moved to SO because I don't have enough rep here
@HarryCBurn I'll keep that in mind. :-) Okay, I'll go now. See you later. o/
21:09
@DamkerngT. Alright, see ya' later!
@TinyGiant Ah, right. That sucks.
It will disappear after a while.
We do already have one though, the original ELL site.
Ok, I'll be watching both. And I've joined the site. We'll see if I can contribute anything useful.
user116848
Thanks for watching Giant. Much appreciated!
user116848
A neutral party would be a very good idea.
21:17
@TinyGiant Awesome, I'm sure you can!
Nice!
Congratz @Harry!
user116848
Yeah congrats.
user116848
@snailboat Why not add me too?
user116848
I won't kick Damk if that's what you are thinking :-)
Oh, that's quick.
Congrats @HarryCBurn!
21:39
Feels jealous
Now I can be relieved.
user116848
Well, I am not jeal.
Meh whatever, I'm an RO in The Periodic Table anyways.
Anonymous
@M.A.Ramezani Well, he volunteered. Are you volunteering?
user116848
@snailboat I am.
21:40
I can help @snail.
And I'm not afraid of kicking.
Anonymous
There, now we have two folks who haven't been on either side of any conflicts as room owners.
Thanks @snailboat.
Thanks @snail. Too bad @Dam is gone. (I think he wanted it)
I'm still around, though. :-)
Just ping me.
Anonymous
21:42
Ideally, we want the chat to run smoothly with a minimum of conflict, without needing people to intervene.
3
@snailboat - Indeed :-)
@DamkerngT. @Dam @Dam!
I shall take my modhammer and bid you good evening.
@snailboat I'll volunteer as well, as an indifferent observer.
@Richard Thanks Thor. I hope we won't get spanked by your hammer anymore. (aka it would be an ideal world here)
@TinyGiant You first, must prove as a reg.
user116848
21:44
@TinyGiant Yes we would love that.
Start posting something interesting.
user116848
@M.A.Ramezani Hey!
@DamkerngT. Oh wow, awesome!
Thanks @Dam! :)
Sorry I missed it!
user116848
So kids are the room owners here, cool. Well, yeah, okay :-)
Anonymous
@TinyGiant I'll let the existing room owners choose to add you or not, as they wish, as it is now their room :-)
21:45
@Arrowfar The path of ROship is hard; is he a worthy candidate. . .
BTW I'm just being dramatic.
user116848
@M.A.Ramezani Be nice room owner :-)
@Richard Gud'night Richard!
I just made my first post on ELL
@Arrowfar Hey don't look at me like this. I've dealt with more drama in SE than you can imagine. And missed some amount of drama no one can imagine.
Anonymous
Oh, and @TinyGiant, welcome to ELL!
21:47
Thanks :)
user116848
@M.A.Ramezani Yeah yeah.
@TinyGiant Whoohoo I hope we earned an ELLer and a chat reg.
user116848
Bye Richard!
@M.A.Ramezani Nice answer!
Oh, I somehow missed this, and the drama. Again. Shame on me!M.A.Ramezani Jun 27 at 10:29
21:48
@HarryCBurn @M.A.Ramezani Congrats! Use it well.
I wanna test zis by kicking @Harry out. . .
user116848
heh
Anonymous
@TinyGiant Oh, looks like a good post! I upvoted. I'll make one note, though. Here on the language sites, people really dislike code formatting. People like italics, bold, and quotes.
@DamkerngT. It's a shame that you've gone, we'll miss your totalitarian authority ;)
@M.A.Ramezani D:
Hehe! :-)
Anonymous
21:49
Linguists use italics for the use-mention distinction. When you use a word, you write it normally. When you mention a word, you put it in italics:
@TinyGiant Welcome to ELL, and here; hang in more often, we might need a senior room owner in near future. ;)
Anonymous
1. Snails are cute.
Anonymous
2. Snails is an English word.
Whoa it's been some time since I last used a smiley.
Anonymous
And use bold for emphasis.
21:51
I see dis a very good moment for posting this:
15
Q: Main Chatroom Etiquette Guidelines

Martin - マーチンWhen I was walking through some of the chatrooms on the network, I found that mathematics.se has some rules for their chat. I thought this might be a good idea for us as well, hence I propose these guidelines: Have fun! Our chatroom is intended for casual conversations. There is almost nothing ...

user116848
@M.A.Ramezani Good.
I've updated the post.
Anonymous
Nicely done!
I've upgoated it already.
Anonymous
That'll stave off the hordes of anti-code-formatting commenters :-)
21:52
@snailboat Ew, bold for emphasis? Nah, it's all about italics.
Awesome, good to know.
Anonymous
@HarryCBurn Yeah, italics are more normal for emphasis in, for example, fiction.
@HarryCBurn No.
@M.A.Ramezani WHY NOT BOTH?
Anonymous
I actually really like using both. It makes it easier to see than using italics alone.
21:53
@HarryCBurn Because my head doesn't rotate well.
AKA because Hagu.
Anonymous
Malacology is the word for the study of mollusks, such as snails.
Anonymous
See? You can't miss it.
@snailboat Also makes the post look UGLY. AS. HELL.
Grammar books usually use italics for example sentences.
I would imagine there are use cases for each style of formatting text. Has there been a meta question asked about what the general uses of each are?
Anonymous
21:54
@HarryCBurn Pardon me, I have to go shed some tears...
Anonymous
I think you can find some meta discussion on meta.english
@HarryCBurn You sure haven't seen me abuse MathJax.
I meant for use on this site.
Anonymous
ELL came later, and I think we've largely inherited the conventions English.SE settled on
@M.A.Ramezani I'm not even too knowledgeable about that :)
21:56
@TinyGiant A lot of people here aren't as fluent as the other chatters here.
@HarryCBurn About my abuse?
@M.A.Ramezani About MathJax.
@HarryCBurn There's something here we say in response to this; it's
Anonymous
I'd like to bring up another topic briefly.
Anonymous

 English Language Learners

A room to talk about English, linguistics, or anything you wan...
> Half of your life has gone to waste.
Anonymous
21:57
The original general chat room still exists, and its sole owner no longer frequents the room.
@M.A.Ramezani 0:
@snailboat Ah.
It doesn't have a very offensive tone though.
user116848
Kids let snail talk.
Anonymous
What should we do about this?
Don't worry.
21:57
@snailboat I propose to burn it.
user116848
I mean MA and IP,
Anonymous
I'm not planning on being in there enough to act as room owner.
user116848
:)
Anonymous
@TinyGiant That's certainly possible.
Anonymous
It does seem redundant with this room having become the new general chat room.
21:58
Perhaps @DamkerngT. could apply some new room owner giving techniques.
@snailboat I can't say I was ever hopeful for the success of both.
@snailboat The name certainly isn't as cool and classy as ELL's cabin.
@TinyGiant I second.
Anonymous
Anyone against freezing it? It'll always stay around as a historical record, so you'll be able to search it. And if need be, it can be unfrozen by a moderator at a later date.
This room can serve both the purpose of being a general chat room as well as the purpose of specific advice for non-native english speakers.
user116848
Yeah freeze it.
Yes, freezing is better.
21:59
@HarryCBurn Well, I don't have much to say. Common sense and good attitude should suffice.
Anonymous
But I do agree, the site probably only needs one general purpose room. And if that's what this has become, the other room can be frozen.
There has been some really useful conversation there.
Anonymous
Okay, Arrowfar, MAR, HarryCBurn, TinyGiant in favor of freezing. Let's do it.
2
@DamkerngT. Sure!
Oh, @Dam!
user116848
@snailboat Sure!
21:59
Then for historical purposes, I agree that it should be frozen instead of being deleted entirely.

« first day (82 days earlier)      last day (416 days later) »