@mathphile Eh maybe this is more informative:

lambs =
  Quiet@
   Table[
    {x, NIntegrate[-LambertW[-Log[y]]/Log[y], {y, .1, x},
      MaxRecursion -> 200]},
    {x, 0, 1.6, .01}
    ];

ListLinePlot[Re@lambs]

Then you can easily extend it like:

You can also plot both real and imaginary parts like:

ListLinePlot[
 {
  Re@lambs,
  Transpose[{lambs[[All, 1]], Im@lambs[[All, 2]]}]
  }
 ]

A fun thing we can do with Mathematica's CellFrameLabel

That thing will resize nicely, can be customized at the stylesheet level, and will appear just like that when we close and reopen the notebook, unlike an attached cell.

There's one magic number to it, but it seems as if only the one is needed and it doesn't depend on environment that much (so it should only be OS dependent, not setting dependent).

If V12 (presumably) drops on Tuesday, is this a midnight Monday into Tuesday kind-of thing? I have never been an active user during a release, but I am very much anticipating this! I wonder, how have previous releases gone in terms of rolling out updates? I have seen the online version and (some) help documents are updated, so the desktop release seems imminent. Many thanks to all of you, also! I hope to submit content near as decent as you all, soon :D

@CATrevillian "how have previous releases gone in terms of rolling out updates?" summary dates of Mathematica releases and updates are on this page 12000.org/my_notes/compare_mathematica/index.htm normally when M is released it takes few days to show up on user's portal to download. (assuming you have premium subscription)

@Nasser ah so one would find quicker access purchasing a new license, if one already has a premium subscription for their desktop Mathematica? I have it in my mind I would be able to refresh during the morning Tuesday, to find the ability to download V12. I am hopeful this is so!

@CATrevillian you might try getting a free trial version to test the new features in 12.0

@b3m2a1 I made the directory first, but that didn't help...

@CarlLange I was also thinking about using the wolfram cloud for a blog of sorts; is that something you've done or just thinking about it?

@ChrisK that is a good idea, I wonder why a delay for subscriptions would exist, I will have to investigate once the sun rises! I am quite excited for all of the new implementations of WL once all of these roll out: reference.wolfram.com/language/guide/…

@ChrisK I haven't executed on it in any meaningful way. Many people here have various different solutions for blogging from WL though!

@b3m2a1 Not sure how others feel about this but I hate clicking through pages and I'd prefer to have more than 5 items displayed per page: paclets.github.io/PacletServer

@ChrisK Can you tell me what you tried exactly? I tried it out locally and it worked, but there might still be something weird or maybe some of my personal settings are leaking.

@Szabolcs I was thinking about this literally yesterday

I kinda like not having everything on one page for like appearance reasons, but I could definitely do like 10 per page or something.

Or maybe it just makes sense not to paginate at all when you only have <30 paclets

@b3m2a1, personally the first thing that I do on any website that lets me is set the maximum number per page to be its maximum

whether that is 50 or 100 or whatever

> @b3m2a1, personally the first thing that I do on any website that lets me is set the maximum number per page to be its maximum

Yes, me too.

packagedata.net shows > 200 on one page and I think it's quite usable (partly thanks to the search feature).

@b3m2a1 I made a fresh start and it worked this time; thanks!

@b3m2a1 Let me know if you have an easy way to do a batch job on everything in the directory (otherwise I can probably figure that out myself later)

@CarlLange My own potential use is really code-heavy, so I think the cloud approach might be the best for me, but it'll have to wait until I have some free time

@Szabolcs There's actually also a search on the paclet server :) But I'm down to turn off pagination.

Here's a sample search

Is there a way to make Interpolation not care about lack of grid structure in like the 16th decimal place?

@b3m2a1 Try to use Round (see 2nd argument) to snap them to a grid.

That's what I'm currently doing. Was just wondering if there was something in Interpolation that smarter people than myself had put together.

@b3m2a1 When your points are on a regular grid, why don't you use ListInterpolation and only give the boundaries of your grid? That would circumvent the problem altogether.

@halirutan because I always forget about ListInterpolation. Looks like it should be even easier to work with.

How to fix this NetInfromation occurs in more than one context: One of the definitions is shadowed

Is it safe to assume that if you encounter an issue with forms (and cloud deployed forms), and everything appears to be in order, that there is a good chance you are just dealing with a quirk in the system?

I have noticed that a lot of questions about FormFunction and FormPage end up with no answers or comments.

@kickert I think that part of the language is just not that commonly used.

and because of the nature of the thing, the cloud does seem to get regular updates that users aren't notified about, so bugs might be fixed without any fanfare.

@CarlLange I think you are right. It's a shame though. Forms are a great way demonstrate technical findings to non-technical people. I do a lot of work in Social Sciences and forms are excellent for mocking up different scenarios when analyzing data. Manipulate works, but also has its limitations.

@kickert I agree! It was definitely a big draw for me when I first started using WL. I found that the flexibility wasn't really there for me though, especially with regard to cloud credits. Sharing something widely feels prohibitive. In any case, it's a pity not to have seen too much Cloud* development in 12.0 - hopefully there will be more soon :)

@Szabolcs updated:

<< paclets.github.io/PacletServer/Install.wl
PublicPacletInstall["MaTeX"]

Paclet[MaTeX,1.7.5,<>]

@VitaliyKaurov I showed something similar last year