@Kuba have you ever seen "ActionFunction" used with DynamicModule? Or "Value"?

@b3m2a1 nope, where have you seen it?

CurrentValue[$FrontEndSession, {StyleDefinitions, "Output",
  DynamicModuleBoxOptions}]

Interesting. But no

@b3m2a1 - I hope you like it when it comes out - at the time of the tech conference it was pretty raw - a lot of what I showed there was only possible because I had set my kernel up beforehand (stacking the deck). Been spending the time since trying to bulletproof it and make it more integrated with the rest of the kernel functionality. It isn't coming out in the upcoming 11.3, but my fingers are crossed for the next release.

writing docs/tutorials/guides is going to be very important

@JasonB. I’m sure that’s gonna be rough. I spent a solid two weeks straight writing partial documentation for a chemistry paclet of my own and none of those docs were even close to WRI standards.

With or without the documentation, though, I’ll make sure to dig through the paclet code / *Values to figure out how it all works (assuming everything isn’t Locked and ReadProtected)

Isn't it fun to see how our attitude to lazy, but interesting questions with zero effort changed over the time? Compare 41 votes with -1 vote:

Yet another bug: TimeSeriesShift across the boundary between years -1 and 1 works incorrectly.

Anyone got a clue about this mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/156161/… nice and relevant question? Is it possible or the framework is incomplete. Doc says all ZeroMQ types are supported. The zeroMQ doc here describes the types MMA claims to support. api.zeromq.org/3-2:zmq-socket I was wondering if something like this is achievable in MMA 11.2 raw.githubusercontent.com/booksbyus/zguide/master/images/…

Fun, no any information about the next verion?

@halirutan you should work out an answer and sit on it until the question gets a score of -5 votes

Not too many reversal badges around here

@halirutan You've got to love the comment: "Sorry, I'm not quite familar with projection,may be someone could do it." -- Actually I think even today, if someone can post a visually exciting solution before the critical onslaught, people will react to the answer more than the question.

@MichaelE2 Yes. I thought about posting this comment as well because it's hilarious and it basically cries for downvoting and closing..

@JasonB. Not a lot of downvoting on the site, perhaps? Not sure what one should consider "a lot." My impression is that we tend simply to close things rather than downvote them to oblivion. But maybe that's just me.