« first day (4271 days earlier)      last day (522 days later) » 

Feeds
Feeds
01:37
0
Q: Is this worthy of being reviewed? [Riemann Equation]

Anthony PulseStarting at $1$ and with inclusivity of only $3$, we can answer our question. Using all positive real numbers, numbers coming out of the algorithm will show truly as Prime numbers $$\sum (P_{n_0} + 3), (P_{n_1} + 3)$$ If the integer is not $MOD5$, and not $MOD2$ excluding the integers, $2$ and $5...

prime-numbers prime-factorization riemann-hypothesis prime-gaps coprime
 
6 hours later…
Sine of the Time
Sine of the Time
08:00
math.stackexchange.com/a/4773230/1118406 Is it ok to put so many links in one answer?
 
2 hours later…
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
10:12
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad phone number in body, bad phone number in title, potentially bad keyword in body, +1 more (394): Moco ruby. Loan .CusTomer .care. HelpLine .number ☎️8074589406=91=8637017859 Call Me Now‭ by irfan Khan‭ on math.SE
Peter
Peter
10:24
please close/delete
Peter
Peter
10:35
please delete
please delete
 
1 hour later…
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
11:39
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body, blacklisted user (72): How do I get started with Khelraja's Crash Games?‭ by Khel Raja‭ on math.SE
 
6 hours later…
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
17:18
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted user (71): need help with majoring in engineering technology‭ by Leonard Britolli‭ on math.SE
Feeds
Feeds
17:35
-1
Q: Do the patterns observed in our study suggest that Collatz sequences are inherently decreasing in nature?

PMFtl;dr: Our exploration of Collatz trees reveals a significant overrepresentation of the modular classes $16n+5$ and $16n+13$. Through the introduction of the Odd Transformations Suite (OTS), we gain a nuanced perspective on Collatz sequences, particularly highlighting the behavior of odd steps. T...

collatz-conjecture
Bill Dubuque
Bill Dubuque
@SineoftheTime They link to a couple standard references on the topic, a couple related SE threads and a reddit thread. What problem do you have with that? One should welcome informative links.
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
18:34
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in body (95): Is there a lack of rigor in the standard analysis? ✏️‭ by Gustavo Gabriel‭ on math.SE
 
1 hour later…
Sine of the Time
Sine of the Time
19:46
@BillDubuque I just asked for clarification, no need to jump the gun.
Bill Dubuque
Bill Dubuque
20:42
@SineoftheTime Again, why do you possibly see a problem with a handful of (pertinent) links? It's a sincere question posed to help us understand your viewpoint. I don't understand why you view such a query as "jumping the gun".
user 726941
user 726941
> What problem do you have with that?
seems a bit agressive, taken out of context
Xander Henderson
Xander Henderson
@SineoftheTime Lots of links is a red flag, but not, in and of itself, a problem. It is only a problem if the links are unrelated to the topic at hand (e.g. spam), or if they are not really credible (e.g. there are users who will post several links to their own previous questions, reddit threads, or personal blogs).
For the linked question, I don't see an obvious problem with any of the links.
A couple of them are, as Bill notes, to fairly standard references.
Bill Dubuque
Bill Dubuque
21:02
@user726941 But it was not posted "out of context" . Rather, it is in the context of my entire reply.
amWhy
amWhy
21:17
Please delete this poor answer

« first day (4271 days earlier)      last day (522 days later) »