delete Very basic question with a silly attempt at solving it.

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of body (42): induction problems.‭ by Ran Zhong‭ on math.SE

math.stackexchange.com/q/4766252/42969 had been closed as a duplicate of math.stackexchange.com/q/1987022/42969 and later reopened. It still looks like a duplicate to me.

@MartinR ^^^ my dupe link has now been restored, but not before a high-rep user added a dupe answer (even though the dupe link was clearly visible in the "Linked" sidebar). Please be careful when reviewing reopen requests.

cv-pls combinatorics There is no policy against posting Q&As for Project Euler questions. However, I think it is in poor taste, as it is against the wishes of the administrators of Project Euler. Maybe this is something the community wants to close? Counting positive integer linear inequality solutions with constraints‭ - qwr‭ 2023-08-27 04:20:32Z

Open for deletion

please delete

D: In the prior mentioned dupe, this answer which duplicates the method in the dupe I linked 1 hour prior, continues to receive upvotes - now 3 (possibly because someone flagged it, attracting anti-dupe sympathizers) I think it should be deleted, along with the question, since we already have far too many answers showing these binomial theorem methods.

@BillDubuque Trying to help to cancel the most recent vote. We need one more close vote to delete. I tire of the games people play on this site!

Alas, that (high-rep) user appears to be very anti-dupe, e.g. posting similar rude anti-dupe closure comments here. so there is probably not much more that can be done (except by mods). Thankfully this is relatively rare - most users seem to make some effort to follow the EOQS guidelines once they become aware of them.