https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4608140/let-g-be-a-finite-group-of-order-n-such-that-n-is-divisible-by-a-prime-p wierd PSQ, the OP seems to already know the answer
Apparently, they are using the site to keep their answer for future reference. Is this allowed?
@Ѕᴀᴀᴅ Your delete votes have been invalidated by MSE users. You are still trying to delete the question. Sorry, but you won't win. If the question is deleted again, there will always be people who voted for it to be undeleted. Good luck.
@lonestudent Perhaps one deleted post was reversed; but you claim SAAD's delete votes have (all) been invalidated. That's not true. It is not okay to speak of things that are untrue. Please do not misuse CURED.
@amWhy Well, maybe I would prefer not to answer. It is clear that the problem I am talking about here is D-7 in the tagged row, which I tagged and the voter knows for sure. Technically, for a question whose deletion is not undone, I have no reason to lie. The mentioned question is obvious. My English isn't as great as yours, but I usually prefer not to respond to provocative comments.
Why @Mark, @gist refer to the user as ChatGPT? Most problematic users change their usernames several times. Besides, remember to request action against problematic post rather than targeting users?
It wasn't my intent to target a user. Is me calling the answer a chatgpt answer targeting a user? My comment on the answer itself I don't think targets anyone either
@amWhy I did not refer to any user - much less target one. ChatGPT is a powerful new chatbot produced by OpenAI whose implications are profound. Output produced by ChatGPTS has been banned on StackOverflow and discussed but not yet banned here on Math.StackExchange. This is a topic that I would think might be of great interest to those involved in content moderation.
My impression is that the user is using ChatGPT to answer lots of questions. They've posted at least six today that have all been deleted. This could become a common practice and I just don't know where it's going.
To be clear, I don't mean to call out that user; just to point out the general problem.
@MarkMcClure Thanks for the time you took to clarify to me about what ChatGPT was referring to. And I can see neither of you nor @gist, were targeting the specific user, but the AI.
I have only five more downvotes for the day (for three hours), and three spare downvotes, for three hours. but posting candidates is good, and eventually in about three others, we embark on a "new UTC/SE day"! and can vote again!