[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of answer (35): Uniform convergence of series $\sum x/(n^p + x^2n^q)$ for $p > 1$ and $q \leq 0$‭ by Sonia Sharma‭ on math.SE

@user21820 What do you recommend when this happens? math.stackexchange.com/q/4458731/29335

close This duplicate has very good answers in this posting

@rschwieb In that case, I'm more or less fine with the question as it is because: (1) The "star" made the asker doubt the simplicity of the solution, and so it is impossible to pinpoint any specific point of doubt; (2) Not likely to be a duplicate. The question could have been better if the asker wrote one line for each of the "not Noetherian" claims, but since it's kind of obvious at the level of the asker I don't care.

@XanderHenderson It isn't of any interest, and I agree with closure+deletion because there is a serious lack of effort, witnessed by "D = a,b" and "don't under the" and "(a,a) and P(b,b)", among other things.

Also, I recognize this username; see here for past misbehaviour.

@user21820 It strikes me as a now singularly useless thing to retain, and that it should be deleted. I don't think it's ever even going to be a relevant search hit unless the title is refined, or something.

@rschwieb Sure; I have also no problem if it is eventually closed and deleted, for the reason you state (i.e. no lasting value).

@user21820 Thing is that there's no clear thing to close it as :(

If only there was something like "no lasting value/obsolete now"

@rschwieb You can write that as a custom close-reason. I would agree with it.

@RRL One more delete-vote.

Same here.

C

C

close PSQ with two answers.