« first day (3600 days earlier)      last day (1191 days later) » 

00:14
Why was the following deleted?
Please may I have it undeleted?
00:28
0
Q: In A Standard Encoding of ZFC. How Long Would A Proof Have To Be To Never Find It?

tooAnnoyingI am interested in the following question: If all of the computational power and energy that has been dedicated to mining bitcoin had been dedicated to guessing random strings of 0s and 1s, and seeing if the resulting string was a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis in ZFC, how long would the proof o...

I found this:
6
A: On what conditions is a question automatically deleted?

user98130A sufficient set of conditions for auto-deletion is: question is more than 30 days old has negative score has no answers is not locked From what you said, your question met all of the above conditions. There are also other reasons for auto-deletion, see meta.SO.

My deleted question was answered in the comments.
01:13
this question was vandalized by author themselves. Reverted to a saner version. Hope they don't vandalize again.
It appears the above question was part of a project / assignment and they were not expected to get external help. So vote for close and delete.
0
Q: Evaluation of $\sum\limits_\Bbb Z Ξ(x)$ with the Riemann Xi function on the critical line.

Tyma GaidashThis question is inspired from On $$\sum\limits_{x=1}^\infty \text{Ci}(x)$$ for another in a series of an infinite sum of a single function. Another inspiration is the Riemann Xi function $ξ(t)$ on the critical line, $Ξ(t)$, as seen in the link: $$\sum_\Bbb Z Ξ(x)=\sum_{x=-\infty}^\infty ξ\left...

 
4 hours later…
05:57
@ParamanandSingh Vandalised again after closure. I’ve flagged for moderator attention.
 
3 hours later…
08:32
A (multiple) duplicate in my opinion: math.stackexchange.com/q/4311183/42969. The accepted answer is also given as an answer in the suggested duplicate target.
 
4 hours later…
12:08
@Feeds Thanks for finding that post by... tooAnnoying...
12:19
@amWhy @Peter: When are you both going to use my script and never again retract votes accidentally? =)
@Peter Up for deletion.
12:46
 
2 hours later…
14:49
15:30
@Peter Did you paste the right link? I don't see any close-vote there right now.
 
2 hours later…
17:18
24 messages moved to Trash
The original delete request here was problematic. The rest of the conversation doesn't make much sense without the original request, thus I have removed that conversation.
 
4 hours later…
21:29
Please close (only one more close vote needed.
2 messages moved to ­Trash
Hello, @Lobic !
Hello, also to @WillOrrick !

« first day (3600 days earlier)      last day (1191 days later) »