CURED - 2021-08-23

« first day (3511 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1282 days later) »

Lllt

09:03

math.stackexchange.com/questions/2148304/… PSQ

2 hours later…

MathStackExchange

11:11

A form of PSQ: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1713928/…

PSQ: math.stackexchange.com/questions/4230995/ratio-of-1-cdf-to-pdf

Almost an attempt, but some type of PSQ: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3722012/…

Almost PSQ, bad formatting: math.stackexchange.com/questions/4231006/…

SmokeDetector

12:00

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Post is mostly images (18): Prove that the difference between a natural number and the reverse of said number is a multiple of 9 by Leo on math.SE

Xander Henderson

12:30

This question has been reopened, and a new non-answer has been posted.

amWhy

12:49

@XanderHenderson Grrrrrhhh! I try again with a downvote.

@Xander ONe of the answerers has since edited their answer to vent against others' actions on the question, an edit which I rolled back. I will not do so again, but venting against other users is not legitimate fodder for an answer.

Peter

C/D

note also the weird comments with the "infinite many processors"

amWhy

@Xander: Please see my last comment before this one. Answerer rolled back to an answer starting with what he admits is his opinion.

Peter

13:14

@XanderHenderson Two of the answers are deleted because they do not adress the authors intention, namely to verify his/her own attempt.

amWhy

13:26

for supporting you?

amWhy

14:03

Consider deletion, please

amWhy

14:16

Consider deletion, please

2 hours later…

Teresa Lisbon

16:07

Downvote and delete

@amWhy This and the other request above it are gone.

amWhy

@TeresaLisbon Gracias! ;)

Teresa Lisbon

Please close this question

@amWhy Welcome!

Please close this question

Peter

@TeresaLisbon Hi

Teresa Lisbon

16:23

@Peter Hello! Right now I'm doing CURED work, but sometime I will try to come to the Hopf chatroom. Perhaps tomorrow.

Thoughts on this question? Has two close votes, seems like some attempt is given but in the only answer the attempt is called unclear, can someone explain?

Teresa Lisbon

16:45

Reopen? Source is provided (I checked : it can't be more detailed than what is given unfortunately), and OP has provided useful information by factorizing the given polynomial into irreducibles. It may or may not be their work, but if it is then this is ok for me.

Closable question

Duplicate Wanted to ask OP, but they are gone, so we go by faith (and trust me!)

Arctic Char

17:32

user21820

18:01

@TeresaLisbon Up for deletion now.

amWhy

@user21820 Indeed, only one more delete vote needed, @TeresaLisbon, @user21820

Martin R

Need detail or clarity: math.stackexchange.com/q/4231143/42969. (Why do people ask for clarification after answering it ?)

user21820

@MartinR Itchy fingers.

Arctic Char

18:22

user21820

18:33

D1, D2, D3.

D4, D5, D6.

D7, D8, D9.

D10, D11, D12.

Peter

18:44

D12 is from the stone-age :)

amWhy

@Peter Are you saying I preceded the stone age? ;P :-)

Peter

@amWhy I am so old, I could be a neanderthals :)

amWhy

@Peter Hah! ;D

Peter

19:11

@MartinR answers gone

user1729

19:26

@TeresaLisbon I think the issue with the effort here is that it is directionless. Why are they factoring the polynomial as opposed to, say, multiplying it by 10?

« first day (3511 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1282 days later) »

all rooms