« first day (2883 days earlier)      last day (1613 days later) » 

12:19 AM
Not an answer but lots of handwaving and links to results that don't apply.
 
 
9 hours later…
9:41 AM
Convoluted story, but OP here (Q2) had this (Q1) question put on hold. Q1 is a "no effort" question, but was answered. The OPs "effort shown" in Q2 is basically "I can do Q1", which I think is playing the system. So Q2 is really a "no context" question and should be closed.
(Also, two people (one of them me) asked the OP to show their effort in Q2, linking to Q1, and then someone else commented about something else. The OP responded to the third comment but not to the first two asking them about effort. Which boils my piss.)
Also, feel free to delete Q1.
 
 
9 hours later…
7:16 PM
A “I have no idea” duplicate: math.stackexchange.com/q/3463245/42969. How many answers will be posted before this is closed?
 
7:27 PM
-3
Q: Tile Euclidean space with compactified Euclidean spaces

UltradarkSay you compactify $\Bbb R^2$ into a unit square. Can you then take infinite copies of these Euclidean spaces and tile $\Bbb R^2?$ I've heard about tiling Euclidean space itself but not about using Euclidean space to tile Euclidean space. Is there a name for this new space? Is it homeomorphic ...

 
8:23 PM
 
It would be helpful if others could share their views here in GENTLE about the undeletion voting ring behavior that "user" is engaging in.
 
user12692
@BillDubuque I am afraid there is no such "ring", whatever it means. I do not understant what "the undeletion voting ring behavior" means.
 
Possible duplicates:
1.https://math.stackexchange.com/q/3463319/407165
2.https://math.stackexchange.com/q/3397633/407165
3.https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1537160/407165
4.https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1937642/407165
5.https://math.stackexchange.com/q/2976996/407165
 
8:42 PM
@Jack But there is - by at least one user. It is explained in the linked GENTLE message
 
 
2 hours later…
10:18 PM
Look at 8 latest answers by user. Duplication in there already.
 
@JyrkiLahtonen Shouldn't by targeting to a specific user be avoided? What about our CoC?
 
I am complaining about the behaviour of answering PSQs and FAQs. Mind you, I flagged answers by other high rep users (who should know the rules) as well as yours. I will draw attention to their posts as well, if they come here. This is not personal. You are simply the most active of those users whose behavior I will continue to protest.
Admittedly in your case punitive deletions feel like an appropriate response.
 
10:45 PM
@JyrkiLahtonen You should avoid these kind of anathemas, in particular against specific users. That's really a bad behaviour. Deletion shouldn't never be punitive. If you think that something deserve deletion you are free to delete. May I be free to undelete?
 
11:38 PM
@JyrkiLahtonen Almost surely they are all dupes. It's unfortunate that calculus / real-analysis has gotten so out of hand. It's a cherry picker's paradise. Is there anyone who even attempts to handle the massive duplication there or has everyone give up hope? (I rarely browse those tags since I think I can make more valuable contributions elsewhere)
 

« first day (2883 days earlier)      last day (1613 days later) »