contest-plz-help has been reopened, and I disagree with it since it was a cheating attempt and still has no effort shown. But do people here concur with me?
@user21820 It is largely without context (that it comes from a couple of contests is some context, but insufficient in my opinion). The lack of effort shown is also an issue, but I think that I have made my opinion regarding effort quite clear.
@XanderHenderson Yes I remember. I meant that there is nothing besides the problem statement (the source was not added by the cheater), not even any effort.
This question has been marked as a duplicate by Mark Viola, but the question is slightly different (summation is different). Can something be done to reopen the question?
After the above four deletions, we've cleared the last month's worth of results of my starred query (closed, -3 or lower, last activity older than 14 days).
We can proceed to older material, or we can expand the search parameters to "-2 or lower", or a more recent query of course (e.g. older than 10 days).
^^^^ @quid, @AlexanderGruber, you are each welcome to contribute votes to the nine questions listed immediately prior to this comment!
@JoséCarlosSantos You are also welcome to cast delete votes to [a] -[i], listed above, though I understand that at this time of day, those votes may be running low.
Thanks, @quid. When I selected the questions and cast the first or second vote to delete, I really never checked whether or not there were answers. Maybe a search for "score -2 or below, created last month, last active 10 days ago, newest" would be better than the same, except for "last active 7 days ago." At least that would yield results post Roomba.