« first day (2396 days earlier)      last day (2396 days later) » 

Xander Henderson
Xander Henderson
02:18
I've tried to help, Robert Israel gave essentially the same answer that I would have, but the question is not clear, and the answer clearly isn't what the asker is looking for. I think that the question should be closed as either unclear or lacking context.
 
1 hour later…
Xander Henderson
Xander Henderson
03:29
Comment posted as an answer by a low rep user.
Mason
Mason
03:40
@XanderHenderson. Could I bug you for a sec?
Mason
Mason
03:56
No matter.
 
11 hours later…
Shaun
Shaun
15:26
Worthy of deletion.
 
1 hour later…
user21820
user21820
16:40
Lacking context: Α, B, Γ.
2
John Ma
John Ma
17:12
Please review the following/cast votes when you see fit:
1, 2, 3, 4
5, 6, 7, 8
9, 10, 11, 12
13, 14, 15, 16
17, 18, 19, 20
 
2 hours later…
Xander Henderson
Xander Henderson
18:47
@Mason Was there something that you required?
Mason
Mason
19:21
Required is strong language. I wasn't pleased with some comments but wasn't sure how to navigate it.
It wasn't quite flag worthy.
Cured would be the obvious rearranging of crude... considering the objective of this chat is to cure the site of "bad" posts... and there isn't anything crude about it...
amWhy
amWhy
19:40
@Mason I like that!! CURED
2
Mason
Mason
19:55
Yup yup. I require no attribution. I only regret that I only have but one life to give for this math website.

"Be Cured!" To incorporate bounty.
"Curbed" is pretty funny though... "I think this question needs to 'be cured'" vs "I think this question needs to be curbed."
 
1 hour later…
amWhy
amWhy
21:03
@Mason Sure, and "BE CURED" incorporates "bounties" and re-iterates "edit"!! (Re-iterating "edit" can be a good thing!)
Xander Henderson
Xander Henderson
@Mason Sorry, I've been out most of the day. What was it that you wanted / needed / didn't need?
Mason
Mason
Meet me in a less frequented chat maybe? chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/81160/…
Mason
Mason
21:39
@XanderHenderson. Ty
Simply Beautiful Art
Simply Beautiful Art
21:53
Possible duplicate of this question?
amWhy
amWhy
@SimplyBeautifulArt I voted to close as a dupe, which I think it is/was, but it also had the <logic> tag, so it was dupe hammered. When I voted to close, I had not looked at the tags!
Simply Beautiful Art
Simply Beautiful Art
oof lol
:-) well one may not have expected the particular choice of tags.
Xander Henderson
Xander Henderson
22:43
Oh, look. This again.
geocalc33
geocalc33
wow...
Mason
Mason
Oh! I was suppose to argue my case here I guess.
Ummmm... the OP asked about the implications of this math fact 0.99999=1 and not about the fact itself.
Also... not sure I care that much.
Xander Henderson
Xander Henderson
23:19
Yeah, but the problem is not understanding that $0.99\bar{9} = 1$.
If you actually understand why that is true, then you can immediately spot the flaws in the argument given.
The problem with the question is that the asker doesn't actually understand the arguments about why $0.99\bar{9} = 1$.
Fix that problem, and the question goes away.
Mike Pierce
Mike Pierce
23:48
Chasing Points PSQ: This is a pretty common calculus challenge though, right? But I can find the right duplicate target.
amWhy
amWhy
Consider for deletion

« first day (2396 days earlier)      last day (2396 days later) »