[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Several emoji in title (90): Knowing that: $\cos(3x) = 4 \cos^3(x) - 3 \cos(x)$ and that $54°+ 36° = 90°$ ✏️‭ by Edward‭ on math.SE

@amWhy: perhaps I should have qualified my message with "apart from review queues". I can edit the message, but will leave it so that the history remains.

math.stackexchange.com/questions/4631812/… close please

math.stackexchange.com/questions/4631752/… PSQ

math.stackexchange.com/questions/4631721/… same

g'nite @ParamanandSingh

math.stackexchange.com/questions/4506956/… delete low-quality late answer

@SmokeDetector am tempted to flag as spam, but the link may be helpful and it isnt overly promotional

@SineoftheTime: morning time here in India around 6:26 am, but good night!

math.stackexchange.com/questions/4631980/… close

math.stackexchange.com/questions/4631987/… close

math.stackexchange.com/questions/4632178/… psq with answer

one more downvote needed to make this duplicate deletable

same here

please delete

one more downvote needed also here

@Peter open for deletion

math.stackexchange.com/questions/4630671/… close

math.stackexchange.com/questions/4630699/… same question asked here by the op

Answer needs one more delete vote

good answer , unfortunately to a very low quality question

shall we delete this question or wait a bit , if an improvement comes in ?

@Peter wait :)

Dv/Del PSQ & exact dupe of FAQ

@SineoftheTime Could be deleted anyway soon , but I do not (yet) set the final vote. It is , to my opinion , not a duplicate.

@Peter seems to be a hot topic, more than 40 comments in an hour

@SineoftheTime Therefore I flagged it that it should be moved into chat.

@Peter Only one del vote needed, and now at -5, I think it's pretty safe to delete.

@SineoftheTime Why?

@Peter ^^^ There is already an effort, via edit, to reopen it: check the reopen queue. If reopened, regardless of score, the closers will be barred from voting to close the pos

^^^ ... from closing the post again.

@SineoftheTime Comments have nothing to do with the quality of the question, nor with the decision to close or delete. As @Xander puts it, "comments are ephemeral". I hope I got that right, Xander ! :-)

@amWhy I've never said: a lot of comments $\implies$ good quality question ;). I've just stated a fact, namely that there are more that 40 comments to a question asked 1 h ago

@SineoftheTime You also advised "Peter wait :)", and your next statement to support that was "Peter seems to be a hot topic, more than 40 comments in an hour". So I wanted to clarify my most comment comment to you. "Hot" is not equivalent to "wait"

@amWhy Deleted anyway. Finally, considering the behaviour of the author (some comments were somewhat rude) this is justified. So, I won't support the undeletion (one vote , not surprsingly , came already in).

del-pls 20k+ probability This answer was deleted in review by "recommend deletion" votes. The answerer undeleted it. I don't think that the answer is very clear, but I don't think that it is bad enough for unilateral and permanent moderator deletion. Can I request more eyes? Answer to: Understanding Monty Hall problem‭ - Pragyan Srivastava‭ 2023-01-27 14:44:44Z

@XanderHenderson The is poorly formatted, with a huge block of text that doesn't "hang together". I cannot vote to delete again. I've done all I can. Maybe others can respond to your request above. I already provided days recently, and again today, my eyes. (Just written in a matter of fact tone of voice.) Thanks for asking here.

Sorry, too, ^^ for all my typos, and omitting of words. I think more rapidly than I can type! :/

Please delete this poor answer

@bobeyt6 The post you answered here is no better than is the post you requested closure of today.

Nor was your answering [math.stackexchange.com/q/4631801/90030] and better that your request to delete an answer to a PSQ here, on Thursday. Please follow the same guidelines you want us to penalize others for.

→ 1 message moved to ­Trash

math.stackexchange.com/questions/4632503/… user asked 2 same question

@amWhy Sorry I couldn't resist. I tried deleting later but it had unfortunately been accepted.

hi @bobeyt6