1:50 AM
D1, D2, D3, D4

2:03 AM
0

So I had an interesting idea. Lets say I have 2 gases in $2$ different universes. The first one in a box $G_1$: Notice the boundary condition for this gas is described by a potential $U = \infty$ at the edge. Now I place rotated (by $\pi$ ) and laterally inverted copies of this and construct an...

5 hours later…
7:09 AM

8:06 AM

1 hour later…
9:20 AM

1 hour later…
10:31 AM
Shall we close this ? If yes, for which reason ?

10:46 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in body, link following arrow in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body (154): Hebrew University Scholarships for International MSc Students in Bio-Medical Sciences‭ by Hebrew University of Jerusalem‭ on math.SE

3 hours later…
1:22 PM
I flagged the last coment here as "unfriendly or unkind" - declined. I am not sure whether flagging makes sense anymore at all considering such decisions.

1:38 PM

1:51 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (62): Goldbach Conjecture Counterexample‭ by MofB‭ on math.SE

2:19 PM
@Peter that flag wasn't handled by me, but somehow the comment does not look unfriendly or unkind. It starts with "i do not disagree" so the tone is more like avoiding any conflict. Still I would request people to flag comments which look "unfriendly or unkind" to them.
Most such flags are helpful to delete rather aggressive comments.

2:31 PM
@Peter One more delete vote needed at math.stackexchange.com/q/4366335/42969.

2 hours later…
4:43 PM

5:35 PM
@MartinR Will you vote to delete this question?

1 hour later…
6:56 PM

1 hour later…
8:10 PM

2 hours later…
10:35 PM
@JoséCarlosSantos Hi JC, just to ask the syntax you used to create the close (or delete) box that appears in your message.

10:53 PM
@OliverDiaz It's [tag:close].