CURED - 2020-06-06

@JyrkiLahtonen A good cath is better than a bad cath, but I would prefer not to be cathed at all. Fortunately, my bladder and kidneys all work fine.

Shaun

2:11 PM

reopen Context added.

@Shaun What context?

Shaun

@XanderHenderson That the OP has tried division by $\cos x$, etc.

Honestly, that division makes the question less clear to me. Their reference to wxMaxima makes it appear that they want a numerical solution; the algebraic steps seem to contradict that interpretation. I don't think that the nature of the answer expected is at all clear.

SmokeDetector

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body (98): GRE 0568 #65: Disprove 'There is a continuous one-to-one function from $(0,1)$ onto $[0,1].$' ✏️ by BCLC on math.SE

Saad

2:28 PM

c0603-11, c0604-04, c0604-05, c0604-06,

c0604-09, c0604-16, c0604-18, c0605-02, c0605-05,

c0606-01, c0606-02, c0606-03, c0606-04, c0606-05, c0606-06

d0604-04,

d0606-01, d0606-02, d0606-03, d0606-04, d0606-05, d0606-06,

d0606-07, d0606-08, d0606-09, d0606-10, d0606-11, d0606-12

4 hours later…

RRL

6:01 PM

DA, DB, DC, DD, DE, DF, DG, DH

DI, DJ, DK, DL

user21820

D1, D2, D3.

D4, D5, D6.

D7, D8, D9.

D10, D11, D12.

Clatz!

KReiser

6:50 PM

@JyrkiLahtonen Funnily enough I originally found out because someone posted an answer pointing out the source, and that answer ended up in a review queue as "not an answer".

4 hours later…

10:29 PM

A: Is CRUDE healthy?

Unfortunately, this unhealthy nature of CRUDE (now named CURED) still seems to continue to this day. After monitoring the chatroom for some time, I have observed that one of the biggest problems is CRUDE users often calling others in the chatroom to add downvotes or close votes to a question that...

10:40 PM

@RithikKapoor Curiously I had not even seen that post. I now voted and it is at 0 now. :-) Irespective to this, there are several issue with the idea of this post, leaving aside the inconclusive nature of the vote. Anyway, please, do not stir up controversy here.

amWhy

@quid Indeed, they don't even have a valid account on math.se anymore.

Or else they've changed their name only on math.se to Mr.Matho, lol

11:13 PM

@RithikKapoor the argument was that you do not even seem to be active on the site you express concern about.

@quid the votes speak for themselves not my name. I have decided to start a new thread for users to vote and hopefully more of them will be able to participate than this post. Maybe then you would accept the result that the community doesn't want you guys anymore acting for them?

amWhy

@RithikKapoor Your post has a negative vote count. You're hardly in a position to know what the community wants, given you are a new account with no activity.

@amWhy at the end of the month it was positive (note that the vote was till the end of the month)

It's not about the name per se. It seems what happened is that a dead link in your chat profile gave the impression that you do not have an account on math.se anymore. On second look one then can assume, given the identical image that you in fact are the user that asked on meta. Whence the above remarks, I assume.

@RithikKapoor the vote is irrelevant. If you do not wish to contribute to the purpose of the room, please, leave.

As said:

Please do not stir up controversy.

11:32 PM

I have nothing more to say to you guys

amWhy

@RithikKapoor We're not all guys. And stop demonizing users here. That goes against the code of conduct. You, after all, are a user here. So what you say about users here applies to you, too.

@RithikKapoor one should note that the room actually creates a certain additional transparency. If there were no chat, likely users would just go by the questions on the list of posts with delete or close votes that the software provides.

@RithikKapoor Oh, I am so looking forward to your mansplaination!