cv-pls geometry Not a very good question; has a spammy answer. What is the volume of the 3D platonic solids?‭ - Alexander Day‭ 2017-05-01 12:30:00Z

This symmetry argument is wrong. (Another similar wrong answer by the same author is already deleted.)

@XanderHenderson Well... there were two problems, and I chose to highlight the more egregious one first. Also because I actually read through enough of the answer to be 100% sure that it is a useless salad. =)

@user21820 Oh, indeed. I wasn't criticizing.

Or rather, I wasn't criticizing you. Only asker/answerer.

Oh I know. I'm just explaining why I didn't bother to mention the question, because I was too lazy to read it.

thumbs up emoji

Lol.

Text emoji.

That's how Millennials talk, right? With their emojis and hashed tags and whatnot? ... Right?

@XanderHenderson I have no idea. Do they even talk?

Ha!

Need more data. When you look at 100 sheep and none talk, we need more sheep, just in case 1 in 1000 actually talk.

c0602-03, c0603-02, c0603-11,

c0604-02, c0604-04, c0604-05, c0604-06,

c0604-09, c0604-14, c0604-16, c0604-18,

(Mostly from yesterday)

c0605-01, c0605-02, c0605-03, c0605-04, c0605-05, c0605-06

d0523-09, d0603-13, d0604-04,

d0605-01, d0605-02, d0605-03, d0605-04, d0605-05,

d0605-06, d0605-07, d0605-08, d0605-09, d0605-10

D1, D2, D3.

D4, D5, D6.

D7, D8, D9.

D10, D11, D12.

C1, C2, C3.

C4, C5, C6.

C7, C8, C9.

@user21820 Sadly, D2 could have been handled automatically if not for one of the close voters answering the question with a comment. :\

Title-PSQ with "iunno! TIA!" body. math.stackexchange.com/q/3707489/29335

@user21820 The exercise in D11 is great. I'm going to have to steal that. The question, however, deserves deletion.

The "or" in the close reason "needs clarity or details" needs to be bold and flashing. I think that a lot of people see that and think "Oh, I need to provide MORE details!" See, for example, C3.

@XanderHenderson That's why I think the former, and current, close reason "needs context", and the former "this post is unclear" were preferable. There is now far too much overlap between the current formulations.

@amWhy No doubt.

@rschwieb I really like your comment below that question!

@XanderHenderson Please see the recent discussion in "whatever, quid" about the close reasons.

@amWhy I'll go have a look at that. ;)

@XanderHenderson Please do, and feel free to chime in!! ;)

cv-pls ordinary-differential-equations As stated, this is a physics homework problem, not math. When will the object hit the ground‭ - Tunifish17‭ 2020-06-05 21:50:34Z

Yet another example of bad audit:

math.stackexchange.com/review/reopen/1398600

@Saad Ugh.. put it in the meta post.

@Saad Feel free to vote to close, or downvote. Also, see the meta post "Examples of poor review audits"

@amWhy My quota of votes will be replenished in minutes.

@Saad Indeed ;-) I've already done both, so it currently doesn't qualify as an audit for a "good" post! But the more the better!