close Too broad? Unclear? Simply lacking context?

close This question has been reopened. I voted to close it before for being "too broad." There is a ton of research going on right now regarding differential equations on fractal domains---Stricharz and Kigami have written books on the topic. There are a lot of interesting answers, perhaps, but they depend a lot on the precise properties of the domain.

It needs to be narrowed down, as I indicated in my comments.

For deletion: D1 D2, D3, D4, D5, D6

An appropriate answer to this question is: "Yes."

For deletion: D7, D8, D9, D10,D11

@XanderHenderson: I would have upvoted that one.

Unfortunately I answered this one. To be fair it should be deleted unless anyone feels one observation by OP beyond the problem statement has any merit.

Sadly the majority of questions tagged as sequences-and-series are of this type nowadays.

@RRL The only merit of that observation is that, because of it, the question is not a PSQ. I vored to delete it.

@JoséCarlosSantos: I did too.

... and there is a substantial backlog of such quasi-PSQs.

For deletion: D1, D2, D3, D4

This is the second time around for OP with recognition of an even older duplicate. Of course the question of a converse counterexample remains, but that could have been asked before.

@RRL All gone except for D5 (in other news : I'm already out of delete votes).

Not an answer

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, bad keyword with email in answer, pattern-matching email in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (272): How many combinations of 6 items are possible? by KIM ANN on math.SE

Some duplicate votes needed here.

@MartinR It's closed now.

It can't get more PSQ than this.

@JoséCarlosSantos Closed and open for early deletion.

was self-deleted

@amWhy Thanks.

@TheSimpliFire I wasn't expecting it.

@JoséCarlosSantos @amWhy etc., Do you think this question has enough context? I've talked to the asker but I don't think they get it.

@TheSimpliFire As far as I am concerned, yes, it has enough context.

@TheSimpliFire Ditto for me!

Right, thanks, just to make sure I'm not answering LQQs

Multiple questions no context

PSQ

Oh my...

@SimplyBeautifulArt And also an abstract duplicate.

Delete?

Not sure about closing this question but there seems to be a downvoting spree?

@SimplyBeautifulArt There's no reason to close that one. Note the two downvotes were within 15 mins of each other.

@TheSimpliFire @SimplyBeautifulArt I find the question difficult to parse (for example, it took way to long for me to figure out what "Definition 2" referred to). Perhaps the question needn't be closed, but I do have some sympathy for the downvoters.

@XanderHenderson After all, the downvote button says yes if 'the question is unclear or not useful'

Close

Surprised this notorious question isn't closed yet

(rather, it failed closure on review twice before)

@TheSimpliFire Exactly so.

@TheSimpliFire It is closed now.

For deletion: D1, D2, D3 D4, D5, D6, D7

For deletion: D8, D9,D10, D11, D12, D13, D14

@RRL D2 at least has a few of the asker's thoughts...

delete 1, 2, 3, 4

That's so because, although formally the question is a PSQ, it is clear that the OP is confused about this subject. In fact, the OP asks for a proof that two statements about Lie algebras are equivalent. And they are, but in a trivial sense: both of them hold for any Lie algebra. Because of this, I don't regret having tried to explain what was going on.

Close: C1, C2, C3, C4, C5 - they're from the log of PSQs I answered when I first joined MSE, and obviously things have changed...

(also apparently there's a restriction that you're only allowed to delete 5 self posts a day)

@TheSimpliFire That's a strange restriction.

C6, C7, C8, C9, C10

Delete: D1, D2

12 psqs of 23 from my last page was not a good start :/

C11, C12, C13, C14, C15, C16

D3

7/30 is better

@JoséCarlosSantos Perhaps they don't want users to remove useful content. Vandalizing or excessive deletion of useful posts may trigger an alert within the system, and prompt action from the moderation team. from the help page

@TheSimpliFire Well, that makes sense.

C17, C18, C19, C20, C21

D4, D5, D6, D7, D8

C22, C23, C24

.... last one today D9

Thanks!

(made a marker for those posts for deletion when the time comes)

Very low quality question from a user whose first question was closed as off topic.

I think that self-deletes might also count as delete votes, so it might be that you are just running out of votes.

But it's true that a main motive is a safe guard against mass deletions.

@quid Can you specify, @quid, to whom you are addressing this?

@amWhy I'm out of closing votes, but I downvoted the question. And quid is addressing TheSimpliFire.

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title (96): I need answer for these problems about RINGS AND FIELDS. look at the link. (i.stack.imgur.com/s57mS.png) by M. Umer on math.SE

@JoséCarlosSantos Thanks!

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title (96): Can you explain and give answer to these problems. I have EXAMS. It's about RINGS AND FIELDS. (i.stack.imgur.com/s57mS.png). ✏️ by M. Umer on math.SE

This question needs to die right now. math.stackexchange.com/q/3075049/29335

@rschwieb Done.

User managed to teipthe smoke detector twice with bad questions...