For deletion: δ1, δ2, δ3, δ4,

δ5, δ6, δ7, δ8

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Repeating characters in answer (83): Counting Possibilities with Categories and Repetition by Aduralescence on math.SE

@SmokeDetector Good bot

Obviously, this is a great answer, and merits no action on the review queue...

Lol

δ9

@AlexFrancisco I'm out... :(

@XanderHenderson The same here.

δ10, δ11

δ12

For closure: κ1, κ2, κ3, κ4

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, toxic answer detected (164): Body temperature of the electron gun. The problem of mathematical physics. by banbanned on math.SE

@SmokeDetector Good bot

κ5, κ6, κ7, κ8

δ13

δ14

No effort question.

^^^ answered by a usual suspect.

PSHNQ with minimal effort

@TheSimpliFire No longer HNQ

This meta post was undeleted; three reopen votes currently stand, along with 2 delete votes. One more delete vote deletes the mess of a "question" (rant).

@amWhy On the other hand, one could argue that the meta post should stay visible for everybody to get an idea of the approach of its author and of its rhetorical techniques. (Really, although I have a rather precise opinion about the content of the post, I am agnostic about whether it should be deleted or not.)

That's true, @Did. But I think it should be reclosed, at a minimum, if reopened. But then again, the downvotes speak volumes.

→ 2 messages moved to ­Trash

......................

PSQ 1, PSQ 2, PSQ 3

@amWhy hi

@Ultradark Hello!

can you see my question over at constructive feedback

I didn't ask it on the main site yet

I'll go take a look, @Ultradark.

Entirely unclear question

PSQ

@JoséCarlosSantos Out of close votes, but I'll be sure to catch it later. Thanks!