« first day (2540 days earlier)      last day (174 days later) » 

3:45 AM
@Did @amWhy @XanderHenderson @RRL @MikeMiller: That bad PSQ HNQ has reopen-votes!
contest-plz-help has been reopened, and I disagree with it since it was a cheating attempt and still has no effort shown. But do people here concur with me?
 
4:13 AM
@user21820 It is largely without context (that it comes from a couple of contests is some context, but insufficient in my opinion). The lack of effort shown is also an issue, but I think that I have made my opinion regarding effort quite clear.
 
@XanderHenderson Yes I remember. I meant that there is nothing besides the problem statement (the source was not added by the cheater), not even any effort.
 
In any event, I voted to close.
;)
 
4:36 AM
And I can't for quite some days :|
 
 
1 hour later…
6:04 AM
@user21820 I agree with you, but unfortunately I can't vote to close this again
 
6:25 AM
Nice HNQ with a great answer.
=)
 
 
1 hour later…
7:30 AM
Very low effort post
PSQ ?
 
7:53 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Body starts with title and ends in url (98): Is Sin(Θ) x Cos(Θ) equal Cos(Θ) x Sin(Θ) when interpreted or drawn geometrically? ✏️ by Sanjoy Nath on math.SE
 
9:17 AM
For closure: 1, 2, 3
For deletion: 1, 2, 3, 4
 
9:29 AM
1, 2, 3, 4
5, 6, 7, 8
 
9:46 AM
@Saad 1 close, 2,3 need 2 more votes
 
10:41 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, bad keyword in link text in answer, potentially problematic ns configuration in answer (167): Do we have $\delta(ab)=\delta(a)\delta(b)$ implies $\Delta(cd)=\Delta(c)\Delta(d)$? by latest jobs on math.SE
 
@SmokeDetector good bot
 
 
4 hours later…
3:24 PM
for deletion
 
 
3 hours later…
6:30 PM
This question has been marked as a duplicate by Mark Viola, but the question is slightly different (summation is different). Can something be done to reopen the question?
 
@Jakobian It's close enough to the original, such that the asnwer(s) to the original question can be used to solve your question.
 
It's not my question, it's another users. It can't be used to solve it directly, only partially help in solving it
 
 
2 hours later…
RRL
8:06 PM
Please consider for deletion: A and B
 
8:28 PM
1, 2, 3, 4
 
8:43 PM
After the above four deletions, we've cleared the last month's worth of results of my starred query (closed, -3 or lower, last activity older than 14 days).
We can proceed to older material, or we can expand the search parameters to "-2 or lower", or a more recent query of course (e.g. older than 10 days).
What do you think?
A new proposed query would be:
If we would keep this empty, the influx of the worst offenders would be reduced.
 
It is also possible to start moving to older posts
 
I think "older than 10 days" is appropriate, and expanding to -2 or lower score.
 
@amWhy Older than 10 days as in last active 10 days ago?
 
8:58 PM
@Holo @Lord_Farin. Last active 10 days ago is fine; no need to wait 14 days after last active. I would, in fact, prefer "last active 7 days ago".
 
I miss clicked on too board... Oops
 
@Holo Indeed! I already voted to close (needs one more close vote). But I added another downvote.
 
@amWhy That's a nice one indeed. Could you include the tab=newest or active?
@Holo Closed.
 
@Lord_Farin Not sure what you mean? Did @Holo answer your question?
 
9:08 PM
@amWhy indeed. I find this ordering preferable because the most "urgent" ones are at the top.
 
@amWhy they wanted to change the order the queue is shown to be from new to old
 
Got it, thanks, @Lord_Farin, @Holo
 
@amWhy @Holo Thanks for the discussion and for encouraging this kind of focussed endeavour.
I always find it helps to have a target of at present ~100, which still feels somewhat achievable.
More so at least than the thousands of questions that arise when you don't put a limit to the creation date.
 
@Holo Doesn't matter in this case, it seems that SE took out the people who voted for the most popular reason next to the closure description.
 
@TheSimpliFire Oh, thanks for letting me know
@Lord_Farin without creation date, there are 6000+ posts with -2 or less and 2800+ with -3 or less(with 7 days inactive)
Well, I am off to exploring d-finite sets, see you later
 
9:15 PM
Bye
 
 
9:40 PM
g, h, i.
 
 
1 hour later…
10:41 PM
^^^^ @quid, @AlexanderGruber, you are each welcome to contribute votes to the nine questions listed immediately prior to this comment!
@JoséCarlosSantos You are also welcome to cast delete votes to [a] -[i], listed above, though I understand that at this time of day, those votes may be running low.
 
@amWhy those would all be auto-deleted in one or two days.
 
@quid By Roomba? If so, then no worries.
 
Yes.
Closed with neagtive score no answer is a deleted after 9 days I think. I deleted the last one, which is the only one with an answer.
(The "I think" is for the 9 days. Might also be 7, not sure, but definitely the first batch. )
 
Thanks, @quid. When I selected the questions and cast the first or second vote to delete, I really never checked whether or not there were answers. Maybe a search for "score -2 or below, created last month, last active 10 days ago, newest" would be better than the same, except for "last active 7 days ago." At least that would yield results post Roomba.
 
@amWhy yes, I think that'd be more efficient.
 
10:54 PM
For efficiency purposes, I'm shifting our "delete vote queue" to "last active 10 days ago: Closed, score -2 or below, created last month, last active 10 days ago, newest. That will yield results which survived Roomba.
3
@quid Indeed. We can then use our votes more efficiently.
 
@amWhy Great. Now, it seems basically everything under the search has an answer.
 
@amWhy Question h still needs one delete vote. All others are gone now.
 
@quid Yes, I noted that myself. Good to focus on what won't be Roomba'd.
@JoséCarlosSantos Thanks!
 
@JoséCarlosSantos I took care of it. After all my votes are free.
 
@quid :P
 

« first day (2540 days earlier)      last day (174 days later) »