@SurvivalMachine Questions about programming concepts (such as the connection between OOP and the internet) would generally be on topic for Programmers. However, a question asking to explain some quote is not, see “Discuss this ${blog}” on Meta.Programmers.SE for details. The only person that could authoritatively explain why Matt Weisfeld thinks “OOP became popular because objects are easy to send over the internet” is the author himself; everyone else is limited to speculation. — amon40 secs ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is about licensing, not programming. This is more appropriate for programmers.stackexchange.com. — Barmar57 secs ago
user20683
@RobertHarvey James Kirk was in Starfleet which means he knows quantum mechanics at the very least.
Welcome to Stack Overflow! To get the best quality of answers, please review How do I ask a good question?. In this particular case, you should include your code inline, not just a link to it (links may die, and then future programmers can't benefit!). Don't just post all of your code though! Instead, construct a MCVE to narrow down the problem and make it easier on answerers. You should only have one question, and be cautious about opinion questions ("best practice"), as they are out-of-scope for this site. — Shepmaster23 secs ago
...does the parameterisation of the dependency meet the requirements for "inversion of control"?
No. That's just Dependency Injection.
Look very carefully at the Wikipedia definition for Inversion of Control:
Inversion of Control (IoC) describes a design in which custom-written portion...
...does the parameterisation of the dependency meet the requirements for "inversion of control"?
No. That's just Dependency Injection.
Look very carefully at the Wikipedia definition for Inversion of Control:
Inversion of Control (IoC) describes a design in which custom-written portion...
