« first day (91 days earlier)      last day (3598 days later) » 

00:29
2015-04-21T00:29:00.089Z Quota has been reset. Was 8560 is now 9999
 
3 hours later…
03:10
Certainty level 0.4
@RonBeyer: How would I do that? I mean, if I instantiate the classes 'new', its still correct, as the constructors are getting the correct object type. I want to prevent programmers to call it directly, because it would tightly couple them. — M.R. 1 min ago
 
2 hours later…
05:13
Certainty level 0.63
@VictorSorokin see above ^^^. Recommended reading: What goes on Programmers.SE? A guide for Stack Overflowgnat 1 min ago
05:38
Certainty level 0.4
If there is no way tell me there is no way! this is not same as that question at all :| why because of stupid programmers i get 3 negetive point! :| — Siavash A 1 min ago
05:49
Certainty level 0.4
Great. What have you tried so far and what are your specific problems? stackoverflow is not about getting your job done for you for free, it's about helping programmers solve specific problems. — Zohar Peled 55 secs ago
 
1 hour later…
06:58
Certainty level 0.55
Thank's for replay Patrick and others. But my opinion is that you are programmers with limited knowledge who earn badges on this site if you do not know something. I will ask the same questions on Server Fault. — Arsenije 32 secs ago
Certainty level 0.43
The encodings of all MIPS64 instructions are described in MIPS64™ Architecture For Programmers Volume II: The MIPS64™ Instruction Set, which you can find if you google for "mips64 instruction set". Note that bnez isn't a real MIPS64 instruction, but I'm guessing that it gets translated into bne rs,$zero,offset. — Michael 22 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
What's your question? BTW you shouldn't validate names: kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/…Vsevolod Golovanov 55 secs ago
 
2 hours later…
08:42
Certainty level 0.4
"I don't want my software to be separated to other PCs or companies" -- many programmers share your desire. But it doesn't change reality. If your software is running on their computer, and it's worth the risk and effort to them to violate your contract and copy the software elsewhere, they can do it. No matter what you do. The only way to secure your software is to not give it to someone in the first place. — Peter Duniho 13 secs ago
09:39
Certainty level 1.6500001
This question might be better asked on Programmers. — 200_success 1 min ago
10:06
Certainty level 0.4
While this would of course work as well, using parsers is a great exercise for novice programmers! It's a good chance to get to use some different tools than you would normally use in scripts. — Erik Dolor 1 min ago
Certainty level 0.4
@Mat Is cross-post illegal? if so, why? The viewers are different in this two communities (Programmers and Electrical Engineers) — User1-St 45 secs ago
11:04
Certainty level 0.4
To clarify: the users are not C++ programmers invoking your API functions, but only interact with your program via stdin/sockets/files/whatever (right?). They can only pass strings/bytes over that, and not e.g. objects (right?). — chi 22 secs ago
Certainty level 1.45
this question looks good for programmers.stackexchange.comVihar 45 secs ago
12:01
Certainty level 0.71999997
@200_success this question is a poor fit for Programmers - it would be quickly voted down and closed over there, see meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/6483/… Recommended reading: What goes on Programmers.SE? A guide for Stack Overflowgnat 41 secs ago
Certainty level 0.71999997
@Vihar this question is a poor fit for Programmers - it would be quickly voted down and closed over there, see meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/6483/… Recommended reading: What goes on Programmers.SE? A guide for Stack Overflowgnat 24 secs ago
 
1 hour later…
13:07
Certainty level 0.4
@LeaTano Well, my experiences were pretty positive. The biggest downside is that code becomes a lot more difficult to read when you use it too much. Eval just has a pretty bad reputation because it was used by unexperienced or lazy programmers. But if you really know what you are doing and it's not too much of a security risk, eval can be a lifesaver in a lot of situations. — Y U NO WORK 42 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
related, cross-site post covering similar territory: programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/227639/…TZHX 41 secs ago
13:34
Certainty level 0.43
Getting things to work in the Play Store is a valid endeavour for programmers. But unlike programming is't non-deterministic and any help is appreciated. — user462990 50 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
While the wording of the post is wrong, the REAL question ("my site displays a different file for mypg.co.za than for www.mypg.co.za, what did I do wrong and how can I correct this?") is not off topic in here. Web programmers are supposed to know about server settings too! — Mr Lister 57 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
@Stephen Why is global state so evil? Global variables are a form of global state. — Joseph Mansfield 27 secs ago
Certainty level 0.43
Yes; the problems one encounters when things stop working make one aware of the magic the really great programmers do so the rest of us can get on with our day jobs! — briantyler 1 min ago
14:30
Certainty level 0.4
I'll take readability over efficiency (nearly) every time: blog.codinghorror.com/…David Carboni 15 secs ago
 
4 hours later…
18:42
Certainty level 0.4
SESE doesn't add much value in garbage-collected languages like C# and Java, but it's good practice for C and C++. Leaks or crashes due to missing or incorrect clean up logic is a very common mistake. Even if you are flawless in ensuring that every exit point in your functions cleans up correctly, maintenance programmers are much more likely to introduce errors when they add additional checking for conditions that weren't initially anticipated but showed up during testing. SESE ensures that there's only one chunk of code per function that handles clean-up, and there's no way to circumvent it. — Scott Smith 26 secs ago
19:38
Certainty level 0.4
If the format string comes from the user, you're sunk. You either have to trust them to get it right (which requires that your users are programmers and well-informed ones at that) or you have to accept or workaround crashes. As to my second comment, ...I can't find the information at MSDN, so I must be confusing it with the *scanf_s() family of functions which does have that requirement. So ignore that. — Jonathan Leffler 1 min ago
19:53
Certainty level 0.4
@ryyker it's not incorrect to cast the pointer either, in fact the compiler is doing it implicitly for you anyways. Many programmers prefer to make the cast explicit because it is required in c++. This is just a red herring and not really relevant to the question anyways. — DaveB 1 min ago
20:16
Certainty level 0.4
although use cases are software and system engineering tools, they are not really part of programming languages and you might get a better answer on programmers. — JGreenwell 14 secs ago
 
1 hour later…
21:20
Certainty level 0.84000003
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is about best practices and programming theory. This is a better fit for Programmers.StackExchange, but this question still needs some cleanup before it can be "on-topic" there, as well. — TylerH 1 min ago
 
1 hour later…
22:22
Certainty level 0.4
A good starting point for wizards in WTL, codeproject.com/Articles/4979/…, why are you wanting to change the width? — Jan S 29 secs ago
 
2 hours later…
23:53
Certainty level 0.4
All those problems are because people don't know what IP is. They all are very bad programmers. Writing networking code is a complex task, but not impossible. I wonder why people could learn OpenGL but couldn't learn BSD sockets. android.stackexchange.com/a/106182/103522avesus 22 secs ago

« first day (91 days earlier)      last day (3598 days later) »