« first day (92 days earlier)      last day (3597 days later) » 

00:22
Certainty level 0.4
Also, my gist example is about UDP, but for TCP all things are the same. Just look at any HTTP client library on GitHub. There is no smart API. There is no simple code. Apple and Google wants you to use that IP which they give you! Strange conspiracy theory, right? (On Android, they should make a special Java call to ConnectivityManager to set mobile priority! WHAT?!!) So, things go poorer year to year all because of bad lazy programmers around us. — avesus 40 secs ago
2015-04-22T00:29:00.107Z Quota has been reset. Was 8560 is now 9999
Certainty level 0.4
@chi: The users are C/C++ or (gasp) assembler language programmers passing a parameter to a callable API. It is not the main function of the API, but one of my users is calling from a situation in which he is running as part of the kernel (more or less) and cannot use I/O functions, so I have implemented a way for him or others to output error and status messages on my log. They can pass up to four variables and a "printf() style" text message. They are skilled programmers but stuff happens. The doc emphasizes that stuff should happen in test, not production. — Charles 16 secs ago
01:14
Certainty level 0.4
"If you are looking for speed, you're using the wrong language" - that's wrong, actually, many Java programmers care about speed and they get it. "inefficiencies like getters and setters" - wrong, getters and setters cost exactly zero after JIT does its job. — maaartinus 1 min ago
 
1 hour later…
02:31
Certainty level 0.48000002
@Mathias Muller Please clarify what isn't clear, instead of vaguely designating the help center. As it stands, according to your logic, any time anyone asks a question here it can be legitimately closed because maybe the questioner is asking how to use the software they are programming. In fact, what I'm asking seems to fit very well with the scope defined in the help center: It relates to "software tools commonly used by programmers; and is a practical, answerable problem that is unique to software development." Even in Excel this is not an intuitively known action. — Sirudol 38 secs ago
03:06
Certainty level 0.4
03:47
Certainty level 0.4
Certainty level 0.4
1) Why code an applet? If it is due to the teacher specifying it, please refer them to Why CS teachers should stop teaching Java applets. 2) Why use AWT? See this answer for many good reasons to abandon AWT using components in favor of Swing. — Andrew Thompson 22 secs ago
04:13
Certainty level 0.63
There's an argument this goes on programmers.SE btw. — djechlin 39 secs ago
 
1 hour later…
05:27
Certainty level 0.4
@RSahu my question covers: "software tools commonly used by programmers; and is a practical, answerable problem that is unique to software development" — milesma 57 secs ago
 
2 hours later…
07:06
Certainty level 0.4
These posts 1, 2 could also be helpful. — Blue Moon 20 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
because this is community to help fellow programmers; probably half of new stackoverflow questions are already present. While users should not directly post questions blindly, if you are taking effort to answer a question, you need to trust that seeker and simply answer if you know it else skip. You are not supposed to push them away with comments like next time try google. And I have not looked at your reply, just wanted to let you know why I downvoted your reply. — user1242321 1 min ago
Certainty level 0.4
Certainty level 0.41
Many thanks for the answer! To achive what I've been trying I had to combine both setOnCloseRequest and setOnHidden methods. Your and @MadProgrammers answers lead me to the solution. Thank you! — Kitke 49 secs ago
07:50
Certainty level 0.4
08:21
Certainty level 0.43
Of all places, you post this on a website for programmers. — NewToJS 27 secs ago
 
1 hour later…
09:41
Certainty level 1.45
I guess this question would be better received on programmers.stackexchange.com. Good luck! — Drew Noakes 43 secs ago
Certainty level 0.43
This would not be better received on Programmers. Please don't post there either. — Juhana 58 secs ago
10:09
Certainty level 0.45000002
Experience shows that programmers are notoriously bad at guessing which branches are taken; profile your code instead! — FUZxxl 34 secs ago
 
1 hour later…
11:32
Certainty level 0.4
@rozina Yes, the problem is the unless. 1. I cannot guarantee that some of programmers in the team does not make such mistake which will emerge after porting to different platform. I would rather avoid to different binary interpretation in interfaces. — qub1n 58 secs ago
 
1 hour later…
12:34
Certainty level 0.4
@Styphon, may I ask why you would intercept the submit over a button click? (Pure intrigue on another programmers opinion) — swiftie821 22 secs ago
12:45
Certainty level 1.4
I think your question should be moved to programmers.stackexchange.comKaiido 36 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
(Of course, most sensible programmers would just use an NS(Mutable)Dictionary, if all you're doing is passing an arbitrary list of parameters.) — Hot Licks 36 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
@FranMercaes PHP has been procedural in those days and today you can decide whether to continue writing procedural code or to switch to object oriented programming. That means there are some keywords like global which are not necessary anymore and I would not recommend to learn that old stuff. global always means global/static context which means no isolation of components which is bad practice for OOP programmers. But now to your problem: try to set your error_reporting to E_ALL. Maybe newer PHP versions have global marked deprecated or it's just a typo in your code? — Aitch 57 secs ago
Certainty level 0.45000002
This type of problem is studied in the part of mathematics known as design theory. Originally it was used to design experiments. I suggest asking on math.stackexchange.com (general mathematical question), or if you don't get responses there in a few days, then MathOverflow.net (research mathematics). Few programmers would be familiar with the tools developed in design theory for this type of problem. — Douglas Zare 46 secs ago
13:46
Certainty level 0.41
@Jongware: TBH, I don't know what it needs... I only recently discovered that this new sub-site of SO now exists, and I think it is a very good thing. There IS obviously a strong need for this type of questions, even from seasoned programmers, as soon as they encounter a field of technology they hadn't touched before. I've in the past been very reluctant to put up any flags or votes to close questions -- but now with this new site I'll have no problems to weigh in with my own votes to move such questions to softwarerecsSE. — Kurt Pfeifle 30 secs ago
14:07
Certainty level 0.4
I don't think is any typo. I copy/paste the code from the manual. My error_reporting is set to E_ALL in php.ini. I'm just curious why this happens I never used $GLOBAL or global because just like you said " is bad practice for OOP programmers" but in PHP Certification Study Guide Book they keep talking about global statement. Maybe is failing because the .phtml file where I was trying is part of ZF2 View. I really don't know. Just speculating. — FranMercaes 52 secs ago
14:25
Certainty level 0.47
Thank you for the explanation Aevitas! I reviewed your link....We feel the best Stack Overflow questions have a bit of source code in them, but if your question generally covers… a specific programming problem, or a software algorithm, or software tools commonly used by programmers; and is a practical, answerable problem that is unique to software development … then you’re in the right place to ask your question! — Mark 13 secs ago
Monking!
2015-04-22T14:26:00.770Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some.
Certainty level 0.47
Thank you for the explanation Aevitas! I reviewed your link....We feel the best Stack Overflow questions have a bit of source code in them, but if your question generally covers… a specific programming problem, or a software algorithm, or software tools commonly used by programmers; and is a practical, answerable problem that is unique to software development … then you’re in the right place to ask your question! — Mark 1 min ago
2015-04-22T14:28:00.530Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some.
2015-04-22T14:30:00.685Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some.
2015-04-22T14:32:00.441Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some.
2015-04-22T14:34:00.438Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some.
2015-04-22T14:36:00.536Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some.
2015-04-22T14:38:00.523Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some.
2015-04-22T14:40:00.654Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some.
2015-04-22T14:42:00.633Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some.
2015-04-22T14:43:00.744Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some.
14:55
StackMonkey out .... ;-)
Heap
 PSYoungGen      total 128512K, used 64267K [0x0000000715580000, 0x0000000729700000, 0x00000007c0000000)
  eden space 128000K, 49% used [0x0000000715580000,0x00000007193f2e08,0x000000071d280000)
  from space 512K, 62% used [0x0000000729600000,0x0000000729650000,0x0000000729680000)
  to   space 512K, 0% used [0x0000000729680000,0x0000000729680000,0x0000000729700000)
 ParOldGen       total 198144K, used 193905K [0x00000005c0000000, 0x00000005cc180000, 0x0000000715580000)
  object space 198144K, 97% used [0x00000005c0000000,0x00000005cbd5c728,0x00000005cc180000)
@StackMonkey stack/memory dump?
@StackMonkey You have been of great assistance! Thanks for helping out!
kill -3 of the process before killing it.
(kill -3 does a thread and memory log).
user41796
@StackMonkey poor monkey lost his brains?
user41796
@Duga Duga! We missed you!
user41796
14:59
I hope you're feeling better
@rolfl yup, I learned that recently.
@GlenH7 Missed you too!
Certainty level 0.45000002
@IraBaxter It's not me who's insistent. My boss wants output. I want to do more research and design, but it's "Try the most obvious attack schemes, even if they aren't great nor clear, and see what hits immediately. If it doesn't work, we move on to something else, although we're going to have to go back to this problem later." Trust me when I say I'd like to take a more systematic approach to the problem. You have over 45 years in the game -- maybe this is more a programmers.stackexchange problem, considering my 'plunging' isn't particularly an incompetency issue, but more a cultural one. ha — Mr_Spock 21 secs ago
16:00
The time is 2015-04-22T16:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
16:13
Certainty level 1.7
As this isn't about actual code, but more around code structure, this belongs on Programmers. — zzzzBov 1 min ago
Certainty level 1.81
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it belongs on ProgrammerszzzzBov 1 min ago
16:30
Certainty level 0.4
@T.C.: I think careful tuning will always beat "static" compilers. There are many situations where programmers will know things compilers cannot and vice versa, especially with regard to how often various pieces of code will run when used in expected fashion. Perhaps a more useful "directive" would be to let compilers know which pieces of code will be executed super-often versus rarely, rather than whether or not to inline, but I think compilers will always need some "help" to get optimal results. — supercat 50 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
What I am looking for does not seem to be a widespread practice. It is mostly some people looking at some specific selectors. What I want to do would be monitor all selector, test many pages and see if any selector is suspect. Of course all programmers should know about jQuery selectors and do efforts but you never know what you can find... Maybe some innocent looking selector is worse than you expected, maybe some external lib has a terrible selector in it... — Christophe Roussy 1 min ago
17:01
Certainty level 0.43
Ahan? Well that is the requirement, sadly! And FBLoginView was doing it comfortably for me but f8 want to wreck havoc on programmers over and over again! :P — Mohsin K Ahmed 47 secs ago
17:22
Certainty level 0.4
We're not novel writers, we're programmers. We can't help you without seeing your code. Sometimes one line of code explains more than 5 paragraphs of text. — walther 12 secs ago
 
2 hours later…
19:00
The time is 2015-04-22T19:00:00.002Z and @Duga is alive
19:34
Certainty level 1.4
Certainty level 0.4
 
1 hour later…
20:58
Certainty level 0.82000005
Probably programmers StackExchange would have been a better place to ask this question: programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/279409/…Martin Bayly 46 secs ago
 
1 hour later…
22:00
The time is 2015-04-22T22:00:00.001Z and @Duga is alive

« first day (92 days earlier)      last day (3597 days later) »