@Eliah - on the this isn't really true part on right to left, while a game manual may be written comfortably, are you telling me the greater part of design isn't thought of "traditionally" in a culture where it is an insult if you don't accept a business card with both hands?
@GeorgeEdison it's that newfangled Qt release you're using for sure ;)
@AbrahamVanHelpsing The thing is that they don't even have a single "B" character (Yes, I know there is an "A", sheesh), so the whole "tradition" thing makes no sense at all.
Do Questions about File Conversion via software available on Ubuntu Belong here in askubuntu?
For further details the question I'm contemplating asking is about converting chm files to pdf.
@AbrahamVanHelpsing I'm not sure I see the relevance of this to your claim that modern Japanese text is written right-to-left, which as far as I understand, is incorrect. Also, please note that I was not telling you anything; I posted a oneboxed comment written by someone else in that thread because I thought it was relevant and interesting.
@AbrahamVanHelpsing Yes, it is not in any way my intention to detract from your observations about the importance of tradition in Japanese culture. But Japanese was never written right-to-left, was it? sljfaq.org/afaq/right-to-left.html
@Mechanicalsnail Did you see that launchpad bug against LP itself got closed? I checked the control file and I don't think the person that closed the bug did.
@Mechanicalsnail I'm going to apt-mirror source repos this weekend and grep for the problem to see if I can find an exploitable instance of it. Then they'll have to not ignore it.
That whole don't bring a gun to a gunfight. bring a nuke to a knife-fight mentality
@EliahKagan Traditional Japanese is top to bottom, right to left, like Chinese, while westernized Japanese is left to right, top to bottom. Usually modern Japanese is westernized. This also applies to macro-reading direction (as in, books also start at the other end respectively).
an explanation was provided in the last comment on the bug, if library maintainers aren't changing package name properly on SONAME change then it's a package bug obviously
@AbrahamVanHelpsing Why do you think it's a Launchpad bug? The package's dependencies are wrong -- they don't provide the files that it depends on. The fact that a rebuild fixes it doesn't make it not a package bug if the package's dependencies don't tell the packaging infrastructure that it needs a rebuild.
@AbrahamVanHelpsing It's not Launchpad's job to trigger rebuilds in cases of broken dependencies anyway; it's a separate part of the Ubuntu archive management infrastructure. But even then it's not a bug there, since that infrastructure relies on package dependencies rather than knowing how to manual check relationships for every one of the dozens of language-specific library formats.
It seems to me: Depending on a pseudo-package for dev files: Good thing. Depending on dynamically generated binary dependencies: Good thing. That's where my logic stops. I can agree it's not against launchpad though.
@Mechanicalsnail This is why there's work being done on automated package testing, however covering tens of thousands of packages in universe can be infeasible
Why do you think it is a Launchpad or archive infrastructure bug, when multiple Ubuntu developers and a Launchpad developer have categorically told you that it is not?
if i can leverage this evidencing somewhere else in a delay loaded library that requests root privileges expectedly then i can load an arbitrary so as root. which becomes a problem. rapidly. it's fine though. we'll go about it a different way.
no it's not. if a package gets "updated" and ldpath contains a directory i control that isn't root owned(possible) and i can get an so there under the old name...i have a priv esc exploit waiting to happen.
@AbrahamVanHelpsing If you're trying to find a way to prove that this is a build system bug, you're going to be trying for a while. I suggest you start treating it as a package bug so it can actually get fixed.
That's triggered semi-automatically when dependencies break
The problem here is that, due to a package bug, the dependencies are still satisfiable
This is probably a bug in libgutenprint
If I write a new language with a new library system and get it into Ubuntu, it's not the job of the Ubuntu archive to understand my new language's dependency system and work out when the package will no longer work
It's the job of my package's to declare the correct dependencies, so the archive can know in a language- and build system-agnostic manner whether the dependencies are satisfiable.
If libgutenprint-dev creates a binary dependency that doesn't provide the files that applications linked against it need, then that's not an archive problem.
@jrg: So it looks like I will be able to maintain my own custom cross-compiled build of Qt5 after all. For some reason, running the command that was failing under strace actually caused it to succeed (no idea why).
What are the typical reasons for bugs and abnormal program behavior that manifest themselves only in release compilation mode but which do not occur when in debug mode?
The Big Bang Theory Season 6 Episode 16, Watch The Big Bang Theory Season 6 Episode 16, The Big Bang Theory Season 6 Episode 16 6x16, The Big Bang Theory Season 6 Episode 16s6e16, The Big Bang Theory Season 6 Episode 16nline, The Big Bang Theory Season 6 Episode 16 free, The Big Bang Theory Seaso...
@GeorgeEdison out of the box, i don't think it does any more. isn't that feature disable by default? it was at one point to avoid "copyright entanglements"
StackOverflow probably needs a function to flag users, not only questions and answers.
Case in point: SO tools: new posts by recent users.
Looking at the few first pages, it appears that almost all new users are spam bots. It might be possible to counter this wave quite quickly but the general ...
I think the community does a great job policing questions/answers, etc. and the community has some good tools available to do this. Between flagging questions with some reasons behind it and editing posts, closing them, and deleting them, the only thing that seems to be missing to me is the abil...
@GeorgeEdison Oh, I'm sorry, did I just ninja a GFSE submit? Cause I kinda habitually insta-submit everything that gets pasted here, isn't already on the blog and looks remotely funny now.
I installed Ubuntu to dual boot on my XP box but it wouldn't ever work, so I uninstalled it and am now downloading it to install as a stand-alone OS on another PC.
But one thing it did do that drove me insane, was it kept asking me to enter a username & password every time I (tried to) log on...
I wondered whether How to add custom services to Ubuntu that aren't Canonical's but my own (Cloud service etc) is off-topic because of "I'm making my own distribution of Ubuntu" in the body of the question.
From Eliah's comment, reproduced in part below, I get the impression that questions about...
This is about the tray icon that is shown when the wired network is connected (screenshot attached) under the Oxygen icon theme (KDE default).
It's supposed to be a picture of an RJ-45 ethernet connector being plugged in, which makes sense. However, it looks more like a punk with a mullet wearing a hat.
The cause of the issue is that as drawn, the cable is drawn being plugged in *upside-down*, with the grooves (containing the contacts) on top. Besides being wrong, it leaves space on top in the shape of a hat.
While I have nothing against mullets, the icon should be re-drawn to avoid user confusion.
It will break horribly and crash your computer and ruin your partition layout and forcibly enable that annoying bouncing lines screensaver and drain your bank account and eat your children and...