Morning is there any wrong information in the following statement? ... Just a reminder 16.04 reaches end of standard support between April 22 and 30 2021. You may want to think about upgrading to 18.04 or 20.04. End of Stand Support means no more support or updates. You may not ask questions here either as 16.04 will be off topic. If you sign up for ESM you can still get security patches but that is all. You can sign up for ESM starting on April 30.
@David It kind of make it's poster sound bossy and condescending. Why not stick to answering questions and trying to help people rather than faulting them? If I got a comment like that I would not be happy.
16.04 becoming off-topic seems so odd. I remember installing the beta version to get my wifi working on a new netbook when I first stumbled on Ask Ubuntu :)
@C.S.Cameron well I guess there won't be that many of them coming
@David isn't that a matter of opinion? Anyway the tone of the comment seems ok to me although I'm not personally in favour of posting such comments. I don't know for sure if the information is correct. Doesn't Standard Support end when and only when Thomas Ward ♦ says it does? :)
anyway, someone usually adds something to the tag wiki of a version of Ubuntu going out of support to say that it's going out of support so if you want to give it a go...
@David Not really. I mean, yes you do seem to get quite a few rejected edits, but most of them are approved. Of your last 40 suggestions, 27 were approved and 13 rejected.
sorry, didn't mean to disappear there - it's power cut season
was going to say you can check your edit suggestion stats by going to a post you suggested an edit on (see the suggestions tab in your profile) and then clicking the Reviewer stats button
afaik those stats are public
it expands to show both reviewer stats and editor stats i.e. how many suggestions reviewers approved, rejected and improved, and how many suggestions an editor had approved and rejected
@David they don't have to, but they can, and they have the power to single-handedly reject or accept (it takes two reviewers if they're not the author of the post (or a mod), unless the first reviewer chooses to "improve" the edit by making further changes - that completes the review without the need for anyone else to look at it)
Yeah, and it's really unfair: old-timers just accumulate rep with no effort. Once you've reached a critical mass of posts, you keep getting rep for them.
My last answer on Super User was posted on Nov 8 2017, and yet my rep has been growing steadily: