« first day (2310 days earlier)      last day (2950 days later) » 

11:01
thanks Mark :)
1
Q: Do we have any information on the AU gender balance?

don.joeyDo we have any information on the gender balance in AskUbuntu?

@Zanna voted
@Zanna Done ! ... and ... upvoted your answer to the dupe question ! :) Good morning Zanna ! :) Have a nice day ! :)
@Seth I am 99% sure that's Greece. Both the cobbles and the license plates fit. And, it's the country that has given us such gems as the following case of laying new asphalt but not bothering to warn people not to park:
Or move the trash, for that matter:
@Zanna If you want more awareness, post it on meta
11:05
Sure you meant to ping me @terdon?
@terdon Looks like Africa
Oh now I see it
@Seth Yeah, I was referring to the CSS IRL image you posted yesterday.
@Fabby Feels like it, too. And not South Africa either.
@Fabby thanks, I'll consider it
What kind of government does Greece have @terdon?
11:07
@Seth Oh man. . . OK, I'll answer factually: it's a unitary parliamentary republic
@terdon I can't stand those governmental names
The kind of government we have is basically a bunch of clueless, ideologue morons, running around like their heads were cut off, with one finger in our pockets and the other up their collective rectums.
@terdon you're a mod now, right?
@terdon You can finally do something about
21
Q: Please undo tag synonymizing: gnome-shell -> gnome

muruGNOME Shell is, ultimately, just one component in the GNOME DE. I can use it without many of the other trappings of GNOME, like GDM or Nautilus. It seems very weird that gnome-panel - a thing of distant past - is an independent tag, yet, gnome-shell is a synonym to gnome. By whatever logic that m...

11:10
I thought I did that?
@Zanna Shocked by the punch of the UV -> chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/34999646#34999646 ? :D :D :D So once again : Good morning to you ! :)
@Seth still goes to 's page for me
@BornCoder More complicated then I thought
I'll review again tonight.
@cl-netbox awesome, thanks for the vote. I'd love it if more folks would upvote the question too... how can I improve it (the OP hasn't been around for a long time, so I feel like I can edit it as I like)
11:29
@Rinzwind Rinzy ! :) Good morning to you ! :)
0
A: Ganiw botnet malware

RinzwindThere is hardly any hits on google except for one from a "security labs". The backdoor is described as ... Backdoor.Linux.Ganiw.A is a Backdoor and Bot agent that targets the Linux platform. The malware contacts a remote server, identifying itself, and sending system information. In addition...

BOXY!
this might be a 1st ^^^ I hope he has that backdoor. would be my 1st actual backdoor seen D:
@Rinzwind checking ... :)
@Rinzwind +1 for : reinstall it and restore a backup ! :)
clean backup! >:)
restoring a backdoor is just as bad :F
11:35
@Zanna so ? delete it then ... hahaha :D :D :D
@Rinzwind of course ... what else ? :D
@cl-netbox That'll be a struggle since it has +2
@Zanna But it doesn't hurt - right ? ... who's still using 32 bit in these days any longer ? :D :D :D
@Zanna Are you sure? The user apparently works on Canonical's kernel team.
Please don't post unsubstantiated claims as answers. You are using very specific dates so, presumably, you must have a reference for this. Can you include it in your answer? If not, this will likely be deleted since without backing evidence, it's more of a comment than an answer. (I know your profile states you're working for the kernel team but i) that might not be true, for all I know and ii) that's not obvious to people reading this answer. If you've documented this somewhere, please provide a relevant link). — terdon ♦ 1 min ago
@Zanna guy is a Canonical dev, IIRC and seems to be fairly knowledgeable
11:41
@cl-netbox Yeah it hurts; my machine can ONLY boot with 32-bit UEFI. The rest of the system is 64-bit
@Zanna what did you use for 32-bit UEFI booting? syslinux?
@terdon The specific "as of" month was added as an edit by another user, which I approved. Should I roll it back? To me, "as of" does not mean "starting as of." The post originally said "at present."
@Zanna What is this ? What kind of machine are you using ?
@EliahKagan Ah. I don't know. @MarkYisri where did you get those dates from?
Look, I am a dev of nothing, I don't know anything, and I'm slow as well, but the evidence is sitting on my lap :/
11:43
@EliahKagan Hi Eliah ! :) Good morning ! :)
Good morning!
@terdon I'm guessing he translated "at present" to today's month and the latest release
Oh. Great.
Sigh
Good morning terdon ! :)
Hi cl!
11:44
Hi muru ! :)
That as my interpretation as well. Do you think the phrasing lends itself to being interpreted as, "starting as of"? I still don't really see a problem with the edit -- if the post is later edited for a different reason but not updated with news about support status, then readers will assume the information is current as of the latest edit, unless a specific "as of" date is given. I believed that was the motivation for the edit, and that's why I approved it.
@Zanna no, I'm genuinely curious - Ubuntu ISOs that support UEFI are all amd64
The i386 ones don't support UEFI, AFAIK
@muru I use a 64-bit ISO - and yeah, the 32-bit ISO doesn't work
@Zanna Well you must have a x64 processor ... so why using 32 bit UEFI ? makes no sense to me at all ... :)
@EliahKagan it's definitely not starting as of - all older releases don't
11:46
@Zanna so the answer is correct - right ? :)
@cl-netbox it's the only way for this machine to boot though, not some crazy choice on my part, let me find the bug report...
@muru Indeed. If this risks being interpreted by readers as "starting as of" then I should roll back or re-edit.
@cl-netbox No!
oh zanna :D
@EliahKagan I rolled it back. The edit was putting words in the OP's mouth. "Only X is supported presently" does not mean and does not imply "As of today, only X is supported". For all we know, it started last year or 10 years ago, or it was always so.
11:47
dont bite into a developer >:D
@muru I agree ! :) True @Zanna ! :)
@Zanna But are we 100% sure that means 32bit EFI as well? Does the installer even affect the EFI?
@terdon To install ubuntu in EFI mode you MUST use the 64 bit edition ISO @Zanna ! :)
@terdon we have to use 32-bit GRUB
11:50
@cl-netbox OK, but my point is that the ISO architecture shouldn't be related to the architecture of the EFI. So if you install from a 64bit ISO, that doesn't imply your EFI is 64bit.
@Zanna What does grub have to do with it? Aren't you booting with EFI? Or have you also installed grub?
In my ESP (mounted on /boot/efi) I have a directory grub/i386-efi which is full of 32-bit executables...
@terdon yeah maybe - but : what is UEFI 32 bit at all ? never heard this ... all EFI based machines have a 64 bit processor and all installed systems have to be 64 bit ! :)
Hmm. I wonder if it's a grub thing then. I use the EFI bootloader directly (you don't need an external bootloader for EFI systems).
and here are the files in /boot/efi/EFI
@terdon I now believe you are correct. I should not have approved that edit (or not without further modification). On the one hand, I regularly see "as of" used to mean that something was the case at a particular time, rather than that it began to be the case at a particular time. I believe I even see it in traditionally published, professionally copy edited works. However, it is at best ambiguous, and dictionaries seem not to even have that usage at all.
11:52
EFI
├── Boot
│   ├── bootia32.efi
│   ├── bootx64.efi
│   └── bootx64.efi.grb
├── grub
│   ├── grub.efi
│   └── grubia32.efi
├── grub_uefi
│   ├── grub.efi
│   └── grubia32.efi
├── Microsoft
│   └── Boot
│       ├── bootmgfw.efi
│       ├── bootmgfw.efi.grb
│       ├── bootx64.efi
│       └── bootx64.efi.grb
└── ubuntu
    ├── fw
    ├── fwupx64.efi
    ├── grub.cfg
    ├── grub.efi
    ├── grubia32.efi
    ├── grubx64.efi
    ├── MokManager.efi
    └── shimx64.efi
@Zanna Don't know what to make of that. I see both 32 and 64 there.
yeah I know
mysterious.
And I don't know how to check the bitness of the EFI. Or if that even makes any sense. This is way outside my comfort zone.
but i had hell on wheels getting this system to work the first time
it took me 10 days to get it to boot
we had to compile 32-bit grub
@EliahKagan No, I know the usage you're referring to. But it's ambiguous at best.
11:55
generally systems like this that only allow 32-bit UEFI are a PITA - there are a few nice devices out there that are very very difficult to make play nice with Linux and I have one of them...
Wornik's wiktionary entry defines as of as from, at, or until a specified time
@Zanna : What the hell do you have installed there ?
This is how it has to look like :
cl@cl-uw-1:~$ sudo ls -l /boot/efi
[sudo] password for cl:
total 12
drwx------ 5 root root 4096 Nov 15 17:34 EFI
-rwx------ 1 root root 34 Feb 4 2016 mach_kernel
drwx------ 3 root root 4096 Nov 15 17:38 System
cl@cl-uw-1:~$ sudo ls -l /boot/efi/EFI
total 12
drwx------ 2 root root 4096 Nov 15 17:34 BOOT
drwx------ 4 root root 4096 Jan 24 08:26 fedora
drwx------ 3 root root 4096 Okt 13 15:38 ubuntu
cl@cl-uw-1:~$ sudo ls -l /boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu
total 3648
drwx------ 2 root root 4096 Okt 13 15:38 fw
Oli
Oli
$ file EFI/ubuntu/grubx64.efi
EFI/ubuntu/grubx64.efi: PE32+ executable (EFI application) x86-64 (stripped to external PDB), for MS Windows
@Zanna Next time, just forget about grub altogether.
@Oli Yeah, but that just tells you the architecture of the file. Zanna is claiming that her machine is using a "32bit EFI" and I don't really understand what that means.
@terdon well how?
11:57
ha stole your link @Zanna
Oli
Oli
Oh fair enough. @Zanna Throw it over a cliff, into the sea. Buy a new one that makes sense.
@Rinzwind good, since I'm too lazy/stupid to answer myself
My woes:
5
Q: Arch Linux not showing bootloader on UEFI system

terdonI recently installed Arch on my laptop (Dell Precision M4500). I had just changed the hard disk so I had to partition from scratch during the installation. I chose to go for a GPT partition and also set my system to boot with UEFI. During installation, I tried to install GRUB and failed since I...

It's not clearly documented there but, in the end, I just forgot about grub and my problems were solved.
@Oli it works great these days - I've got a script to modify the iso that fixes all the quirks in one fell swoop :D
@Zanna I think that the details are buried somewhere in this chat discussion: chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/32894/…
12:00
@terdon I suspicious about this no-grub thing. There's a 120ish page thread on Ubuntu Forums for my device, and lots of serious hackers working on it
@Zanna oli's is goign to pay for them new one >:=D
@Zanna Well, I am typing this from a grub-free system.
@terdon GRUB is not bad ... you just have to install everything correctly, then it works great ... you can even boot from ISO files ! :)
Yes, I quite like grub. But in this case it was just making my life hard for no reason.
@terdon I believe you 100%, just not sure it will work on my basketcase toaster
12:01
No idea. I know very, very little about the details of the boot process.
I'm just going to shut up and stop causing trouble...
there now it is proof you said that >:)
Although I have yet to see any evidence, let alone proof, of her causing trouble.
I have >:)
but not as much as you >:)
zanna still has to kill someone's system
Heh
12:04
hmm to my knowledge at least, doesn't mean it hasn't happened :S
And spout opinionated nonsense!
it only counts when it is clear it did >:)
hmm I do that every day --^^
so Terdon is 1 up on you :D
Look at this ... which other boot loader let's you do this that easily ?

cl@cl-uw-1:~$ cat /etc/grub.d/40_custom
#!/bin/sh
exec tail -n +3 $0
# This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries. Simply type the
# menu entries you want to add after this comment. Be careful not to change
# the 'exec tail' line above.

menuentry "clonezilla" {
set isofile="/various/clonezilla-live-2.5.0-5-amd64.iso"
loopback loop (hd0,4)$isofile
linux (loop)/live/vmlinuz boot=live components config findiso=$isofile ip=frommedia toram=filesystem.squashfs union=overlay username=user
12:05
@terdon that's about all I do on SU ;p
@Zanna Well then, just get someone to delete their $HOME and you're all set for the gold badge!
:D :D
I can delete my home with NO problems
see ->
@terdon haha does it count if it's my own? I've come close a couple of times XD
@cl-netbox Uhm. Any, I would guess, but you're preaching to the choir. I like grub. I just don't need it.
rinzwind@schijfwereld:~$ pwd
/home/rinzwind
rinzwind@schijfwereld:~$ ls -l
total 0
rinzwind@schijfwereld:~$
tada
12:07
@Zanna No. That's amateur, even dilettante, stuff.
@Rinzwind pfft. That's nothing:
I know
$ pwd
/
$ ls -l
total 0
hey I aint cheating >:)
12:08
Says you
:P
what about with -A?
my home is on /discworld/ ;-)
aah
XDG_DESKTOP_DIR="/discworld/Desktop"
XDG_DOWNLOAD_DIR="/discworld/Downloads"
XDG_TEMPLATES_DIR="/discworld/Templates"
XDG_PUBLICSHARE_DIR="/discworld/Public"
XDG_DOCUMENTS_DIR="/discworld/Documents"
XDG_MUSIC_DIR="/discworld/Music"
XDG_PICTURES_DIR="/discworld/Pictures"
XDG_VIDEOS_DIR="/discworld/Videos"
so I can format my /home withouth thinking
this smells as circumventing a security measure
0
Q: sh file change md5 when copying to another folder

user1298272I have downloaded a sh file from a webpage. I want to copy it to another machine so I can install it there. the other machine is an imx6 tiny rex. I tried to copy/move/scp to my ubuntu machine to the other one and it seems to be ok, but as soon as I try to execute it, it does a md5 comparisson te...

12:16
Why?
I guess because the script is checking the md5sum in the first place.
But why would moving it change the sum? I assume the script is actually also checking the directory. Maybe something along the general lines of md5sum < <(pwd; cat script.sh)
Okay, but the goal seems to be to keep the script the same. The OP may not be aware of how MD5 works but this sounds like a situation where the file is getting corrupted, possibly because it is being treated as text but has binary contents.
@EliahKagan it is a rather normal method to include info from a system when you do (kernel version, mac address of the nic) to prevent copying a license.
md5sum itself only uses file contents though.
@EliahKagan Is that possible? I mean, can simply moving/copying the file cause corruption? I mean, yes, if there is a filesystem issue, but "because it is being treated as text but has binary contents"?
How?
mind though: he says when executing it does a md5 check. That is rather odd in itself
12:22
@terdon From the OP's description, I'm not sure if the file was downloaded correctly in the first place. I have had MIME-type related problems downloading shell scripts that aren't really text (binary code in a here document) in a web browser. Assuming, however, that it really was originally downloaded correctly, then the most likely cause of corruption is if the OP transferred the file to the other machine using a protocol like ftp that has the ability to treat files as text.
Ah, right.
Many ftp clients automatically use the text transfer mode based on a whitelist of file extensions. It would make sense (though break things like this) if .sh is on that whitelist for whatever ftp client the OP is using. If it's ftp. This is all conjecture.
I wouldn't expect a corrupted file to even manage to run though. I mean, there's obviously a command in the script that checks the md5sum and that seems to be executing as expected. If the file were corrupt, I would expect that to just fail.
Maybe not if the file were just truncated, so there were missing lines of the script, but yes if it were corrupted.
If it were corrupted by treating non-text incorrectly, then everything up to the beginning of what isn't text may succeed. That would presumably include the command to run md5sum on itself. For example, bytes that look like line endings may get corrupted in the binary contents of a here document, but be correctly handled for the text in the script above that point.
12:24
Yes, OK. I can see how that could happen.
@JacobVlijm @Serg askubuntu.com/questions/832095/… start your coding engines >:)
@Rinzwind Ah shoot shoot shoot, I have to start teaching any minute now.. :(
lol
hey
it is already a few months old. he can wait a couple of hours @JacobVlijm
:) pupil in the house :)
CU
new game: hit the pupil! hit 100000 to win.
@terdon too much? ->
Really? Want us also to prepare some toast and tea while you wait? — Rinzwind 15 secs ago
12:34
lol. Probably.
But I can understand the sentiment,
@Zanna please give me the output from : sudo efibootmgr :)
not that again boxy
:D
Ooh, nice. I really should take the time to learnt the damn efibootmgr one of these days.
$ sudo efibootmgr
BootCurrent: 0006
Timeout: 2 seconds
BootOrder: 0000,0002,0003,0001,0004,0008,0005,0006,0007
Boot0000  Diskette Drive
Boot0001* Internal HDD (IRRT)
Boot0002* USB Storage Device
Boot0003* CD/DVD/CD-RW Drive
Boot0004  Onboard NIC
Boot0005  grub
Boot0006* Linux Boot Manager
Boot0007* UEFI: INT13(RAID,0x80)
Boot0008  rEFInd Boot Manager
OHHHHHH YOU REMOVED IT? :****
mod abuse!
12:36
YEEEEESSSSSSssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss!
takes out hitlist and puts Terdon on top
@Rinzwind I only want to help @Zanna :)
WTF
Terdon has a damn floppy disk?
@terdon when you want to boot from rEFInd Boot Manager for example, the command would be : sudo efibootmgr -o 0008
@Rinzwind heh. I do actually, on the machine sitting next to my laptop, but not on the one that command was run on. It's a default, apparently.
12:38
not for me?
sudo efibootmgr
[sudo] password for rinzwind:
BootCurrent: 0000
Timeout: 0 seconds
BootOrder: 0000,002F,0030
Boot0000* ubuntu
Boot002F* ubuntu
Boot0030* CD/DVD Drive
clean <3
Weird
From my machine @terdon :
Set to boot ubuntu as default (0001)
cl@cl-uw-1:~$ sudo efibootmgr
BootCurrent: 0001
Timeout: 1 seconds
BootOrder: 0001,0002,0000
Boot0000* Fedora
Boot0001* ubuntu
Boot0002* UEFI OS
Maybe some Arch thing, I guess.
see! we rule @cl-netbox :=D
I only have Ubuntu on this machine. not even a windows restore
Oh my... "Arch" a four letter word in AU :p
12:42
@cl-netbox the 2 ubuntu's are for 2 kernels? :P
@WinEunuuchs2Unix Pffft. Not like it's Mint.
@cl-netbox ^^
Another four letter word. But isn't Mint a derivative of Ubuntu?
@WinEunuuchs2Unix call it what it is: a ripoff :=)
@Rinzwind which 2 ubuntus ?
12:43
@cl-netbox my bootorder list
@Rinzwind That's elementary my dear OS!
@Rinzwind You mean an improvement with most of the moronic new ideas of Canonical removed?
@Rinzwind not necessary ... you can do that from GRUB
@terdon still a ripoff >:-D
@WinEunuuchs2Unix Yes, Mint basically is Ubuntu with a few tweaks. it's closer to Ubuntu than Ubuntu is to Debian, for example.
12:44
I wonder if Debian folks call Ubuntu a rip-off, or gnome folks, etc., etc.
@Rinzwind I know you're joking but this sort of thing really pisses me off. The whole point of FOSS is so that people can do this sort of thing and calling it a ripoff, even in jest, sends a very bad message to people who don't understand how open source works.
YES!
Love to debate four letter OS words but have to run off to work :(....CIAO.
points at hitlist @terdon
@Rinzwind You have some sort of rash?
12:46
@Rinzwind same with me ... no spyware on my machine ... hahaha :D
@terdon no but i do gave the flu :P
@Rinzwind Heh, that YES was posted just under a smokey link to a spam post advertising skin creaM :)
:D
I missed the smokey post :(
There you go
bbl :=) need some anti-flu medicine
 
2 hours later…
14:26
@Rinzwind I need some anti-people medicine...
14:48
Good afternoon @Hizqeel @TheXed ! :)
15:05
9 AM here...
@TheXed 16.05 here or 15.05 UTC :)
@ThomasWard Very nice of you, also well explained for new users ... and some kind of "dark" humor shining thtrough, so upvoted ! :) Good afternoon Thomas ! :)
15:23
@cl-netbox Well, it appears dark, when in reality it's just my natural humor :)
@ThomasWard I like that special "natural" humor ! :)
:P
@cl-netbox Some disapprove of my humor. So I try and limit it as best as I can in moderator duties. Far less so on Discord and Chat, though it's till restricted to a lesser extent than it is when I'm drunk or with friends out here personally.
You must get drunk often then...are you drunk now?
@ThomasWard Nice ... I already assumed exactly that ! :D
@TheXed i'm working right now, so no.
15:37
@TheXed Doesn't really look so - right @ThomasWard ? :D
@ThomasWard good call then.
@TheXed And trust me, I'm far worse when I'm with my friends and/or totally drunk
@ThomasWard Good then that there's an ocean between us ... :D :D :D
I use to work with a guy that came to work drunk...he didn't last long...
Completely understandable ...
15:39
The worse part is, he was trying to get a management position...what a loser...
@cl-netbox :P
@ThomasWard As you can see we are sharing parts of that kind of humor ... :D
truth!
I also think I didnt' overdo anything on my answer on that meta post
@TheXed Maybe he was aiming for the Balmer trough.
I make some implications that if you do something it'll be bad
and that my moderator diamond makes me less concerned about my rep, but eh, I didn't overdo it I think.
15:44
@terdon what?
@TheXed You know the Ballmer peak, right?
Sorry, BaLLmer
@terdon nope?
Oh as in Steve Ballmer?
So yeah, I was making a pun on peak vs trough.
15:46
@terdon got it...
So Ballmer peak was in full effect for Windows Vista too?
no, the lack thereof was Vista
ahh...
That was the trough. You can see it comes just past the peak.
@Zanna You're not causing trouble in any way ... I assume that you once installed or try to install a 32 bit edition of ubuntu ... so to clean up the clutter, boot from an ubuntu installation media, mount the efi partition and remove the 32 bit GRUB entries from the ubuntu folder ... then set the 64 bit GRUB loader as default with : sudo efibootmgr -o XXXX,YYYY,ZZZZ (the first number block must be the grubx64.efi entry from the ubuntu folder. :)
@Zanna Here is an example from my setup :

cl@cl-uw-1:~$ sudo efibootmgr
BootCurrent: 0001
Timeout: 1 seconds
BootOrder: 0001,0000,0002
Boot0000* Fedora
Boot0001* ubuntu
Boot0002* UEFI OS

This is what the ubuntu folder has to contain :

cl@cl-uw-1:~$ sudo ls -l /boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu
total 3648
drwx------ 2 root root 4096 Okt 13 15:38 fw
-rwx------ 1 root root 64352 Okt 13 15:38 fwupx64.efi
-rwx------ 1 root root 126 Okt 13 15:38 grub.cfg
-rwx------ 1 root root 1096568 Okt 13 15:38 grubx64.efi
@ThomasWard No Thomas you didn't ... as I already mentioned : you kindly explained everything ... and that bounty on top was a great gesture from you ! :)
16:14
good :)
@cl-netbox @terdon also agrees with you. He just won't admit it in public :)
@ThomasWard hahaha ... how can he not ? :D
goes back to poking code while listening to his playlists
@Zanna I forgot to say that if you have any questions regarding those deployment thingies or need assistance and help, please feel free to ask me anytime ! :)
16:31
anyone else able to figure out what the OP is talking about here?
I'm confused :P
@cl-netbox Good afternoon :) How are you
Good afternoon everyone
@RadhwaneChebaane Good afternoon :) How are you doing?
@Hizqeel I am fine today ! :) Thank you very much for asking ! :) I think I wrote a really good answer today -> askubuntu.com/questions/818660/online-ubuntu-terminal-emulator/… so I'm in a good mood ! :) Now what about yourself ? How are you doing today ? Everything fine as well ? :)
Fine, I just earned my first correct answer ;)
16:34
all answers that aren't flagged or deleted are 'correct' technically :P
@RadhwaneChebaane Congratulations ! :) Well done ! :) Good afternoon to you ! :)
@cl-netbox That's nice :)
@RadhwaneChebaane Congrats :)
@Hizqeel You mean the answer ? If yes, thank you very much for the compliment ! :) Something new ? I mean kitty ? Getting harder every day to ask you ... but it really interests me ... :)
@cl-netbox Yes I Mean Good Answer +1 :)
@cl-netbox Not yet still waiting :)
@Hizqeel Hey, thank you so much ! :)
@Hizqeel hmmm ... still crossing fingers ... :)
By the way yesterday I showed my 10 year old how to install a case fan...
@cl-netbox Glad you asked :)
@Hizqeel Makes me happy (at least a bit) ... better would be to hear that your cat is back. :)
@edwinksl already handled.
nice abuse use of orbital weapons
16:56
that was dark magic
not orbital weapons
you are well versed in so many powerful things!
(evil text generator is fun lol)
@Hizqeel @ThomasWard What are you removing all the time ? :D
17:11
@cl-netbox EVIL TEXT MUAHAHAHH
@ThomasWard hahaha ... evil text ... more evil than Ozzy biting off a bat's or a dove's head ? :D
@cl-netbox D̵̢̰̠̺͔̲̹͎͚͙̞̠̯̳͎̥̖̹͉̻͛ͪͬ́̄O̵̶͔͚̣̲̗̥̭̱̲̝̓ͥ͊̋̅̓ͨ̈ͪͣ͊ͩ̂̚É̵̸̡̢̱̠̜͈̫̓̄͂ͮ̆ͣͥ͊͂͢S̑̐ͭ̽‌​̷̗̩̖̤̤͔̱̙̥͉͈̤̲͔̘̠̦̖̰̾͑͋̃͟ ̶̻̹̳̘̳̯̩̩̟̝̺͍̦̝̳̯̦̖ͨ̃̾̃̈́́̚̕T̷̛̫̲͉̦̣͖̘̬͓̭͙̭̯͑̏͆͊͂̃̈́́͛́H͐́͋̇͋ͣ́ͣ̿ͩͦ̔̈͜҉̥͕̫̳̭͇̮̫̗̘͍‌​̳Ǐ̡͕̝̳̝̠̫̗̪͙̇ͣ͋͒̋ͮ̎͠S̷̱̜̤̦̺͚̑ͥ̂͌̐ͮ̃̿ ̶̡̟͕̰̘̣̓̍̓̋͗̐͋ͫ̀͘͞Á̂ͤ̎̉ͣ̂̽̐҉͚̜̩̜̖̬͓̟̫̲̗̬̯̺̰̠Nͥͬ͂͂̆̑ͥ͠͞҉̲̙̻̫̀S̶͌̀̃̋̇̍̚͏͚̰͕̲̦̦̲̀͡‌​̜͖̖̙̪̰W̦͔͚̥̳̥̲͉̖̺̦̪̱̎̓̄̔̊ͮ̉͗̑̚͟ͅE̸̷̟̟̥̙̻̪̙̬̙̣̽̂̾̏͋͛̌ͫͭͥ͜͞R̢̭̤͓̺̭̦̦̝̫̜͙̘̤̈̌̽̍͋̀̐͢͢‌​͈̬͎̼̱̬ ̧͚̖͇̞̞̲ͮ̉̅͌̽͌̃́̔ͫͬ͂̽̅̏ͥ̒͟T̷̛͔̙͓̞͇̊̇̐ͨ̉̄͐̂͋͛͌ͯ̓̄̀̚͘͡H͗̾̓ͪ̿̽̾͂̇͒͆͑̿͆͏̶̭͙͎̣̗̲͍̲̹̕͞I‌​̨͙̹̩͕̳̯̦͚͈ͬ̃͑͑ͦ̉̅͊̌ͮ̾͒̍͗́͘͡N̨̨̻̮̲̼̼̭̩̱͐̂ͣ͗͂͗͗̈́͋ͦ̌̏̀͜͞Ȩ̛̺̱̝̥̹̻ͩ͂ͤ̊̍ͦ̐ͣ͌͗ͭ͂ͨ͌ͪ̚͘͟͡‌​͙ ̨̗̬̟̩̥̝̞͍̻̣̺̲̜͍̠̥̯͐ͤ̍̄ͤ̀̏͆͗͋̈́̏̽̾̉̀͌͆͝Q̵̪̦̭͚̦̜̭̙͕̯͎̥̪̅ͧ͛ͧ͑̂̿̎ͧ͒̌̚͘͡͝U͛͋̍̍̏ͣ̀́ͩͬ̌ͨ‌​͋̌͋ͩ̂ͤ̍҉̞̟̟̪̝̀͜͡E͔̳̣̜̦̜̪̾͌̌̓͘̕̕͢Ş̸̛̟̘̤̣͎̋ͬ̂̍ͤ̈ͣ͟T͉͉͎̜͙̲̞̮͓̰̮̭͉̮̺̦̥͌̌̊̂͑̒́̾̄̾ͥ̕͜ͅ‌​̹I̷̾̌͑̄ͭ̂̋ͧ̽̋͏̷̣͉̣̥͜͡ͅOͨ̍ͤ̈́ͭͫ̈́̊̌̌ͨ͑͂͛ͭ̓͟͏̻̜̺̙̯̜͍͚̦̱͖̝̬͚N̳͈̠̼͍̣͍̯̩̗̣̹̜̻̈́̍̈́̅̀̆̍̉͜ͅ‌​͙͈̭?̽͗̆͐͏̷̡̛̮̟̲͍͖̙̭͍̕
@ThomasWard WTF is this ??? :D
as I said
Evil Text
@cl-netbox There's more readable examples here: stackoverflow.com/a/1732454/603346
@ThomasWard looks very evil indeed ... :D
@ThomasWard OMG ... :D What ??? more than 4000 upvotes ??? OMG :D
17:16
@ThomasWard what was the question again ?
4 mins ago, by cl-netbox
@ThomasWard hahaha ... evil text ... more evil than Ozzy biting off a bat's or a dove's head ? :D
Nah, not evil enough. Ozzy's thing is more unhygenic than evil . . . and kinda is animal abuse
Ya'll mofos ain't evil enough
@Serg I shot and killed a cat once. That makes me more evil than you.
(this is an ancient story lol)
@Serg this was a marketing gag in that time ... also Ozzy is legendary ... :D Hello and good evening Sergiy ! :)
@cl-netbox evening
@ThomasWard O.o OK
17:19
@Serg yep, I have evil streaks in me :)
but meh this was ages ago
... and kinda was not intentional...
anyways
drifts back into the shadows
@Serg evening ? Did you mean : "Hi my friend, nice to see you" maybe with "evening" ? :D :D :D
@cl-netbox Well, it's a short form for "Good Evening" . . .but yeah, that other stuff too ;)
morning! @Serg :=)
@Serg ah ... sounds much better ... :)
boxy! :D
17:26
Rinzy ! :)
@cl-netbox Evil things as Thomas already said :p
stop bugging serg @cl-netbox he needs to start coding :D
@terdon what dates?
drags @ThomasWard out of shadows
@Rinzwind yup, good morning ! 10:28 am here
@Serg 12:28 PM here
17:28
@Rinzwind Nah, it's all good. I'm not working on anything serious right now :)
18:28 here :+) I adapted to your time zone
@MarkYisri New York ?
@Serg I pm'd you a q that :D
@Serg oops
@Serg Toronto, Canada
so near New York (same timezone)
@Hizqeel So I learned that you and @ThomasWard are fighting against each other for being the first to receive the MEAM (most evil Ask Ubuntu Member) legendary super duper diamond badge ! :D :D :D
17:29
@cl-netbox that one is bound to go to @terdon :P
Hi @MarkYisri ! :)
@Rinzwind okay sorry for that ... so @Serg Go ! Start coding ! At once ! :D
yeah as in NOW
he needs to work for rep >:)
@cl-netbox Cat says that all :P
17:32
@Rinzwind I saw the question, but I've no idea where to begin with that one. Plus I don't have access to the hardware that OP uses
@Hizqeel HUHHUHHUH ... do I have to run now ? I'm a bit scared ! :D
@Serg you got -a- phone? do it for that one >:-D
@cl-netbox Forces be with you don't be scared :P :D
@Hizqeel okay ... then I won't anymore ... thanks for your support ! :P :D
17:34
@Rinzwind means that you think @terdon is more evil than @ThomasWard ? :P
yes sir
Terdon has a tag named for it. A terdon :=D
@Rinzwind ohohoh ... didn't know that ... have to be even more careful then ! :D
terdon is so popular that it is its own verb now
17:37
@cl-netbox he showed us a few weeks ago a transcript from chat where he posted an "rm" command and 10 seconds later " do not execute this". And someone already did... deleting his home D:::
done
Speedy... !
@Rinzwind hahaha ... LOL ... @terdon made a typo ? The other day I was blamed for setting a wrong space in a command ... shows to me one (good) thing : even terdon seems to be a human - just as in real life ... great ... I appreciate it very much ! :D
How to annoy @Seth, a simple guide: Ask Ubuntu => AskUbuntu
also, this page is really creepy for some reason.
done

« first day (2310 days earlier)      last day (2950 days later) »