« first day (11 days earlier)      last day (192 days later) » 

01:06
Each proof is designed off of the KJV. Then concepts are expanded, and metaphors become defined variables. Then each word in Hebrew or Greek is defined to its natural language state, then transposed as an equation. Then the Variables are entered into the Equation and the result is then processed by a word form analysis to perfect sentence structure.
The first complication is not really an error. However it causes a distraction and a disability to translators. This is the definition to the Word Elohim (אלהים) that is misunderstood as a name as meaning God. So the proof that Elohim does not mean "God" but means "Objects" is as the following:
In the following Link is a results list of the word for "gods" from the KJV. Take note how many of those translations are the root word "Elohim" (blueletterbible.org/search/…)
By simply exchanging this word Elohim for the word Objects from the KJV, and taking a look at the result. What is more true?
And now, though thou wouldest needs be gone, because thou sore longedst after thy father's house, yet wherefore hast thou stolen my objects? (Gen 31:30 KJV altered)
With whomsoever thou findest thy objects, let him not live: before our brethren discern thou what is thine with me, and take it to thee. For Jacob knew not that Rachel had stolen them. (Gen 31:32 KJV altered)
Note: Rachel stole them. Them is meaning Elohim. Rachel stole Elohim. Therefore Elohim is tangible. Or Rachel could not have stolen the Elohim.
Then Jacob said unto his household, and to all that were with him, Put away the strange objects that are among you, and be clean, and change your garments: (Gen 35:2 KJV altered)
-
So what about the times Elohim is translated as the big G "God"?
-
In the beginning the objects filled up the Universe and the Earth, 2 and the Earth was unfilled confusion and a darkness upon the face of deep space, and the breath of the objects vibrated upon the face of the waters, 3 and the breath of the objects was a light, and the light existed,
4 and can see the objects light, given its functionality started separating the objects between light and between darkness, 5 and calling the objects to light day, and calling the darkness night, and was evening, and was the morning of the first day. (Gen 1:1-5 Decoded)
Note: I found it useful when I learned of how the Hebrews understood the number one. Take a loaf of bread for example. The first piece of bread that you slice off. is how they understood one, Like a unit of measurement. Even the word for the Hebrew word is for unit, so. The first Day starts after unit Zero. Similar to how a computer counts. The unit zero is undefined in the length of time by the strictest standards of biblical study.
-
So the first Hebrew means "In the beginning". This is a pretty standard meaning to this word. The Second word "Elohim" which now we know means "Objects". And the third word usually translated as "created" could still be translated as created, however I found detail that how it was created was by a filling up.
So I am open to suggestions for an alternate usage of "filled up" really it could remain as created, I just like the idea of squeezing in the extra detail to the Hebrew meanings with a bit extra of English description, if it helps to really understand the Hebrew word.
-
02:12
Now there are close to but less then 312,676 Consecutive Hebrew words to the Old Testament. Could I get some direction as to your interest? For the size of this answer could overwhelm me with time seeing as to what three words of explanation took in time as a template.
02:52
Here's some info on BH about the word elohim:
4
Q: Should the word elohim in Psalm 8:5 be translated into gods/angels/or god?

Jim ThioShould the word elohim in Psalm 8:5 be translated into gods/angels/or god? The NIV translates it this way: You have made them a little lower than the angels and crowned them with glory and honor. Another translation, the New Living Translation, has: Yet you made them only a little low...

5
Q: Why is Elohim translated as God rather than gods?

Jim ThioI mean Elohim is a plural form of God. So the correct translation would be gods. Now, perhaps the word elohim is followed by singular words and hence the word Elohim must mean plural. So what? That doesn't change the fact that elohim is plural. Why Bereshit bara Elohim isn't translated as, "In...

The selected answer to the second post above is fascinating. What I don't see in either post is anyone advocating that elohim is sometimes translated as "objects".
 
8 hours later…
11:12
Here is the mathematical proof to the Word of God being Existence. The provable equation (Distance = Rate * Time) = (Time = Distance / Rate). Therefore at the occurrence of the first action of the movement of time. Time becomes a value of 1 making the equation. 1 = D/R. 1 cannot Equal 0, so both Distance and Rate have value to them.
The "Physical Feature" that results from a value to Distance and Rate is Frequency.
Frequency means: the rate at which a vibration occurs that constitutes a wave, either in a material (as in sound waves), or in an electromagnetic field (as in radio waves and light), usually measured per second.
Since frequency is the foundation the "the Word", and also frequency is the foundation to Matter. With the first motion of time, the Objects filled up Existence. As both the Bible and Science both agree.
11:38
@fredsbend "and lower little objects and glory and honor surround" (Psalms 8:5) Now I would want to see this in comparison to the surrounding Word for Word Definitional Hebrew before considering this decoded, but at its root, this primitive decryption still can be substituted into Psalms to get the feeling for what the King is trying to say.
@fredsbend Considering the second answer, his logic mainly still applies. If you reread what I posted I quote myself "The first complication is not really an error. However it causes a distraction and a disability to translators."
Because way back in history, 2000 years ago before the regular usage in language diminished. Objects where defined as gods to the people. I do not know the history on the word "object". I can conjecture that the popularity to the usage of the term object started from the scriptures demands that Universe is not a single Object. Causing them to miss the fundamentals to the Laws of Physics.
12:33
In fact if God is not Existence, then by the proof that The Word made all things would limit the definition of God as the feature of "Time Only". And although indeed I have heard of "Father Time" I feel that this is a limitation to the fullness of him.
So then to prove that God is more then simply time.
And set existian an appointed time saying tomorrow do existian words this land (Exodus 9:5 Raw Word for Word)

« first day (11 days earlier)      last day (192 days later) »