« first day (4430 days earlier)      last day (734 days later) » 

06:51
Morning
Is this comment not very friendly or is that just me?
Welcome, your answer has been flagged as low quality. It needs more substance. Please post the query using a temp table and quote some citation. — Rohit Gupta 2 hours ago
07:48
@JohnK.N. no, it's not just you.
The answer was a one-liner initially though (and then 2 lines)
> SQL server does not use the second index but SQL server uses statistics.
You can use temporary table instead of subquery in your scenario.
Morning
 
1 hour later…
09:23
@ypercubeᵀᴹ What strikes you as unfriendy about it? Seems factual and fairly polite to me
I deleted it anyway since it has served its purpose
The first low quality flag was a system-generated one btw
I don't know what value the answer adds, but hey ho
@PaulWhite I didn't get what "Please post the query using a temp table and quote some citation." was about.
... before noticing the edits to the answer
Ah I see
09:50
and as you said, it served its purpose
10:42
> The system will automatically delete negatively-scored, non-migrated, unlocked, and unanswered questions (both open and closed, including as duplicates) that are older than 30 days.
One of the reasons we have so much crap on the site is people ignore terrible questions. If they at least downvoted them (for free!) the system would delete them after 30 days.
Doesn't downvoting cost reputation? Or is that only for answers?
11:16
it used to. not any more (since 3-4 years ago)
60
A: Should downvotes on questions be "free"?

wafflesCompleted, all question downvotes now are "free" for the downvoter. We did not perform a global recalc. If you would like your old question downvotes to be free, perform a self-recalc at: https://stackoverflow.com/reputation We will be monitoring voting patterns over the next few weeks and ev...

> May 12, 2011
@Zikato It's only for answers, which is why I wrote "for free!"
Maybe Mr Cube was thinking of the automatic downvote that used to come with a validated low quality flag (or even question closure back in the day).
ha ha ha
11:31
So if we down vote all 369 unanswered questions, .... we'd be below 10'000
@JohnK.N. Where did you get the number 369 from?
Using a rough search of is:question score:0 answers:0 closed:no, I see 5,897
The unanswered tab shows 19,785 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
Did you perhaps use NOLOCK
True. I was counting the pages with unanswered questions.
I think that's 396 rather than 369
(I'm using 50 per page)
time for coffee
Also, we'd be below 100,000 not 10,000
Have two 😀
11:37
🤣🤣
at least
I'll go grab a coffee and a fag and come back l8er
The math czechs out
 
2 hours later…
13:39
Goodness me some people are just addicted to backticks
13:49
Has any question that started with the words, "I have identical databases..." ever proved to be accurate?
6
> I have two identical databases. Database A and database B....
here we go
@PaulWhite No
Certainly seems so
14:22
@Zikato I feel like I've noticed in recent times that users are actually upvoting bad questions from time to time. That or people are double-accounting and upvoting themselves.
Some people think it is nice to welcome new users with pity upvotes
Leaves me head-scratching when it's like a 2 sentence Post with 0 details lol.
3
Q: Multiple records same id retrieval

Joms DVI have a table with the following structure USERID CONTACT VALUE 1 LANDLINE +12312322334 1 MOBILE +11234567890 1 EMAIL [email protected] 2 LANDLINE +12312322335 2 MOBILE +11234567899 3 LANDLINE +12312322336 3 MOBILE +11234567898 I want to have a result set of all users that h...

3 upvotes in 3 hours
14:57
The stupidity of the new rep system means 15 downvotes would be needed to even it out
15:37
There are no great questions anyway
Oh I don't know
31
Q: Is there a way to prevent Scalar UDFs in computed columns from inhibiting parallelism?

Erik DarlingMuch has been written about the perils of Scalar UDFs in SQL Server. A casual search will return oodles of results. There are some places where a Scalar UDF is the only option, though. As an example: when dealing with XML: XQuery can't be used as a computed column definition. One option docum...

You probably got a Great Question badge for that
Apparently, we have 76 great questions dba.stackexchange.com/help/badges/42/great-question
I stand corrected, yours was merely a good question (silver badge)
16:01
It's mornings like this that make me thankful gin & tonic exists
Are you sure you never want to work for Microsoft though? Never say never 🙃
Quite sure, tyvm
16:31
That update performance question reminds me of this one from Cade.
9
Q: Instance performance variations around SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD behavior during single-row INSERT statements

Cade RouxI have a shared SQL Server 2016 dev instance in a VM which has poor INSERT performance compared to a shared SQL Server 2012 dev instance on an (supposed to be) identical VM. It also compares poorly to my local SQL Server 2016 dev instance, so I am currently proceeding on the assumption that ther...

Indeed. I suppose that question had the benefit of including a repro. I'd probably have a hard time arguing it didn't get special treatment viz. close voting due to it being from a personality
Those icebergy-type questions do occasionally get good answers with lasting value, but the hit rate is awfully low
Those darned local factors
i think the real trouble is that it's very difficult to teach people how to fish via q&a
Calls to getdate will in turn call the windows api and will switch into non-preemptive mode which can be considered more expensive from the point of view of the scheduler. That being said, in your code you make the call once at the beginning of the batch of inserts as opposed to constantly on each insert. I wouldn't expect a singular call to a system function to cause much of a difference in that scenario. If you are still seeing a significant difference I would suggest to try the recommendations and ensure that you are indeed comparing identical configurations. — Fernando Sibaja Mar 1, 2021 at 14:29
wat
i wonder how many monkeys that took
@ErikDarling I agree. Some of the older forum-style sites tried that approach
@ErikDarling My guess would be all of them
> Calls to getdate will in turn call the windows api and will switch into non-preemptive mode
Literally none of that is true
16:40
Man, the update Q&A really went downhill fast after OP posted their non-answer.
I just caught up on the comments.
You should see the deleted comments
Oh yeah? 😬
well it'll all get fixed next time they reboot anyway
@JoshDarnell seven on the question, fifteen (count 'em) on my answer
Good grief.
16:43
David's still going. Good luck to him.
"Good luck with your science, just make sure you take a scientific approach."
science-based comment detected
@JoshDarnell Oh yes your answer was collateral damage I'm afraid. If you object, I'll undelete it but that will prevent the question being automatically cleared away if it doesn't get reopened.
@ErikDarling Goes to show you can trust it
Naturally, it's not impossible there's some change to 2022 that makes 100k-command scripts slow to run. That question just doesn't allow us to test it.
fixed in cu1 i'm sure
But if you're just trying to prove something you've already wedded yourself to, you're not doing science.
Better off staying on 2019 with that attitude.
I was grateful that no one suggested eliminating the RID Lookup tho
oh the sql server version
not the year of our lord©
i was trying to figure out if 2019 was a good or bad year for science
16:50
ha
well I suppose that is an interesting q
I seem to have run out of votes for the day. Haven't done that in a while
@PaulWhite I was okay with the deletion. My guess did not pan out, and I don't feel like guessing anymore 😁
@JoshDarnell Amen
@PaulWhite even delete votes?
@ErikDarling No, just the regular kind. I can't run out of delete 'votes'.
Speaking of science, I ran into an acquaintance yesterday (we've spoken once or twice before). I mentioned I had a sore throat and was losing my voice. Within 60 seconds, he had gone from telling me he never gets sick, to talking about how deadly and under-researched the C19 vaccine is.
I was dumbfounded.
16:56
round of yikes
I should clarify this fellow is not trained in the sciences in any capacity.
did you cough on him
or did you ping @Zikato to cough on him
@ErikDarling I did not, although I kind of regret it now.
And no, I didn't get around to pinging @Zikato about that.
@JoshDarnell How v surprising
Although I did give him a nice marketing spiel about Venmo for some reason.
16:58
heh heh heh
link in bio
Did you pursue the conversation to see if he or she had any particular views on vitamin D or zinc?
Not going to mention horse wormer
Oops
Cold drinks make the placemats wet in summer. It's a real problem
only if you don't think them fast enough
17:02
@PaulWhite I quickly excused myself after learning the uncomfortable facts that "real" vaccines take 22 years to be developed, and that young healthy people are keeling over from heart attacks from the jab. Understandably, I had a lot of important self-reflection to do at that point.
@ErikDarling I never think when I'm drinking
@JoshDarnell It was Sean, wasn't it
No need to be coy
We're all friends here
Except @Zikato
Hahahaha
Yeah well, I don't know, so there were issues but honestly the pharma companies were on to a loser from the start. Don't come up with a vaccine (or whatever you prefer to call it) and everyone points and laughs at the state of so-called 'scientists'. Produce one, and a different group get bunched up
You know, sometimes bad things happen and people just have to make the best of it
But no, people want to be intensely angry about stuff
But maybe that's what the Illuminati want me to think idk
I still see the occasional #DiedSuddenly on Twitter despite blocking people on sight for it but there you go I suppose
Our gardener's ex-wife got right into it and even ran for the local mayoralty on a platform of idk C19 vaccines are control chips for 5G or sthg.
She got like 12 votes
that's a bit much
big family I guess
All I know is I've had four Pfizer shots and noth
17:29
this always made me laugh
17:50
> Basically this query is quite simple
18:37
Only 3 pings per afternoon. Weak
it is a holiday
today we celebrate our presidents
In that case, I'll celebrate with you the only way I know
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oc3xTj3g9QQ
in minecraft
18:53
Anyone here ever use a free monitoring tool, like this one? sqlwatch.io
i've never used that one
I don't, but I've heard good things about dbadash.com
I've met the author at sqlbits and he's a smart guy. Also very active on SqlServer Slack
19:09
@Zikato Man, that looks great. Thanks.

« first day (4430 days earlier)      last day (734 days later) »