Can't get the search to return messages posted after 2015-04-07. Can this mean the index rebuilding process stopped or is it still working and we just need to wait till it completes?
i'm recently install oracle linux on linux mint using this:
https://mikesmithers.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/installing-oracle-11gxe-on-mint-and-ubuntu/
its works, the step are so many soo for that see the guide, good luck :)
EDIT: ** C&P from the guide **
Installing Oracle 11gXE on Mint and Ubu...
My take on it:
This is impressive, but does the question really require such an answer? What's the point of duplicating such a big blog article here? I mean, if later someone comes up with suggestions specific to the question, their answer will just be lost because of the sheer size of your post. — Andriy M4 mins ago
@AndriyM I would consider that plagiarism, it could possibly take away traffic from the original blog post instead of increasing traffic to said blog post by linking to it and just posting some excerpts
@AndriyM I'm not sure if that answer/artcile is even helpful. CentOS is based on Redhat. Ubuntu on Debian. Differ in certain points, especially regarding installations
@AndriyM I want to stop the process that is stopping the shutdown process because it's taking too long to stop the stopping. I want the shutdown to proceed ...
@ypercubeᵀᴹ Now that might be harder to find a ready solution for.
@ypercubeᵀᴹ A follow-up Workplace question from a colleague: "How can I slap the hand that typed 'shutdown normal' too soon and then 'shutdown abort' even sooner?"
Because the 2nd index has all the ID values ordered. The 1st index has the ID values, ordered by status first, so the ID values are not ordered (actually there are up to 19 (for the values 1 to 19) sub-ordered groups but I don't think the optimizer knows or uses that.) I think the optimizer considers that the join will be more efficient if the indexes from both tables are ordered the same way. — ypercubeᵀᴹ2 hours ago
No doubt it's a style thing, and the monospace side effect is arguable. It just makes my brain work too hard when people do it to excess. And to me, it looks ugly.
Done to excess I mean.
My personal preference is code tags for code. I use italic for column and table names, most often.
I guess an in-line index reference is a borderline case, and acceptable enough to me not to undo it.
@ypercubeᵀᴹ In this case you're probably right and it does look better :)
@PaulWhite In my opinion, the problem with in-line code excerpts is the darkness of the background, more than the monospaced font. Said darkness makes the excerpts look too invasive, so to speak. When used in a normal document created with a word processor, the monospaced font looks much better without such a background (in my opinion, of course).
@PaulWhite It's the way people think. Talk about requirements for anything and people will always express their requirements in terms of inputs into their incumbent process, rather than what they are trying to achieve.
At the moment, backtick markdown elements are rendered with a grey background. This can get a little jarring when used frequently, for example:
I have a table Widgets with columns, WidgetID, Name, Quantity, Frequency, BananaType, and UnitCost. I want to SUM the Quantity for each Name and produce...
At the moment, backtick markdown elements are rendered with a grey background. This can get a little jarring when used frequently, for example:
I have a table Widgets with columns, WidgetID, Name, Quantity, Frequency, BananaType, and UnitCost. I want to SUM the Quantity for each Name and produce...
anyway ... there really needs to be a sarcasm.stackexchange where questions are answered with snark and vinegar. it should be the default migration location for dba.se ... @bluefeet can we make this happen soon?
For my curiosity, I found StackExchange Database Administrators has groups or communities such as Database Administrators and Database Administrators Meta.
What is the difference between both communities? Even my reputation and number of badges are different in both communities. Do I want to fo...
It is jarring, but taking the background colour away entirely leaves it hard to tell what is code and what isn't:
I think we should consider a third option, ether a lighter grey:
Or something else:
Just for reference, this is what we currently have:
@JackDouglas Pretty much. I also wanted to start out with binary options to keep the focus as much as is possible on meta. 100 different answers with 100 different shades of grey was one of the things I was hoping to avoid. A comment on the 'yes' or 'no' suggesting a refinement (lighter background) could be upvoted.
But I'm happy to let the thing develop on its own. That's kinda the point of asking what people think.
@JackDouglas I don't think so, but I didn't check every single one. I still think it's likely the designers would ignore it anyway, but if you don't ask you don't get.
Also, genuinely interested to hear what people think.
I did check with a CM first that the request was not 100% pointless.
@JackDouglas Difference between? Existing dark grey and no/transparent background? Is very clear here.
I have a table Widgets with columns, WidgetID, Name, Quantity, Frequency, BananaType, and UnitCost. I want to SUM the Quantity for each Name and produce a 3-week rolling AVG with a PARTITION BY Name ordered by BananaType DESC and WidgetID ASC. The problem is...
I think I'll not vote on this one, if the formatting isn't overdone I think the existing solution is fine and the new one would be less distinctive, if the formatting is overdone it's the other way around, just my 2c (and paul asked not to vote twice in the question)
I sometimes start off with the odd backtick, then it gets out of control, and I end up going back and reformating some other way (usually italic). It would be nice not to have to worry about that any more.
It's just that a post with one or two inline code blocks the code formatting might be easily glossed over on some setups
which is not really a problem either because a reader of the post who knows what it's about should easily recognize dbcc checkdb is code without formatting
anyway, just my 2 cts, it's not something I feel strongly about
i'm recently install oracle linux on linux mint using this:
https://mikesmithers.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/installing-oracle-11gxe-on-mint-and-ubuntu/
its works, the step are so many soo for that see the guide, good luck :)
EDIT: ** C&P from the guide **
Installing Oracle 11gXE on Mint and Ubu...
I used Shutdown normal, instead of Shutdown immediate.
Now I want to stop the process, because its taking too long.
How can I do it?
For my curiosity, I found StackExchange Database Administrators has groups or communities such as Database Administrators and Database Administrators Meta.
What is the difference between both communities? Even my reputation and number of badges are different in both communities. Do I want to fo...
It is jarring, but taking the background colour away entirely leaves it hard to tell what is code and what isn't:
I think we should consider a third option, ether a lighter grey:
Or something else:
Just for reference, this is what we currently have:
