https://medium.com/universe-factory/the-sisters-war-part-2-chapter-8-c2a73d23f1a1?source=rss----6b76dbf2e0eb---4 Universe Factory - Medium The Sisters’ War: Part 2 (Chapter 8) Monica Cellio 1475803603
@Green thanks for taking the time; I was hoping for the question to have that or a similar effect on the community, it's always fun to take things apart and grow them bigger
@Raisus looking forward to reading it; as mentioned in the question I mostly went along the lines of thinking about how to take away their fuel, thus they would not be beneficial/useful enough to be developed further than a POC... Also have a look at the Doble Steam Car and the modified Travel Air 2000 of the Besler Brothers - there's lots of interesting reading there :D
I mean there's lots of ways to improve efficiency or cut down on size... e.g. when building a plain you can get rid of huge cooling tubes due to the fact that you can just run the exhaust steam along the outside of the plain
Now I wonder: Should I put my steamplane plans into writing/imagery and put them up here as a question about me missing out on any huge gamebreaker, or should I rather not?
@Green I feel we will have much fun playing together - I'm not really a guy that's good at achieving a goal by themselves... but BOY DO I LOVE OPTIMIZING THINGS
@dot_Sp0T Tags are for describing questions, not answers, in order to attract experts and help people find questions about their situation. You can just say in your question that you're only looking for answers which use extant material.
(It's generally expected --with some specific categorisation exceptions determined per site-- that questions not rely exclusively on tags to convey information.)
You should see my half-finished huge spaceships in Space Engineers! As soon as I'm done setting up engineering in order to produce the parts I need to build the ships I get bored
Hot Celestial Seasonings Red Zinger, cranberry juice, lemon juice (or calamansi if you can get it), ginger salabat powder, and just enough brown sugar to take the edge off the tart and sour. Chill. Add fizzy water just before serving.
@Raisus Yeah, it's important to figure out your body's metabolism in order to know when to cut off. Not doing that is how I wound up unable to sleep without caffeine in college.
"Outer islands" is a common term in archipelagos to describe the smaller and/or less developed islands associated with a "hub" island with most of the resources and social/political leverage.
It's been adopted in a (sadly semi-pejorative sense) to also refer to the relationship between the archipelagos and island chains which make up the Micronesian subregion, of which my island is the most Westernised.
I think worldbuilding, especially for RPG settings, is best when it invents as little as possible from whole cloth. At the table there's already plenty to keep track of and remember, so it's useful if the setting is designed to activate existing schema in the players.
Right now I'm revisiting an old campaign setting that I'm considering revitalising. I'm gonna have to update some of its concepts and vocabulary to reflect my better-developed understanding of how much my own lens influenced the design.
@dot_Sp0T I'm also fond of "moon tea," which is tea that's been 'brewed' by letting the leaves sit in cold water for six to 24 hours (depending on temperature and desired strength).
The bitterness and acidity of hot-brewed tea and coffee can be hard on my stomach sometimes, but also it's just a totally different kind of taste.
@AndyD273 only some forms, and apparently it's just a saturation filter
I used to not believe it, but my phone has a colorblind setting which helps me tell the difference between green and red when it would otherwise be difficult to do so
yeah, I used to argue that if you could fix colorblindness with glasses you could do it on computers. But now apparently that does happen, so I guess it works
I just like being able to change the color of something by force of will. It's like a superpower I have only because I can't see well enough
@Raisus It's a trade-off I suppose. While strictly speaking, I'm a rather different adult than many of my peers, I kind of don't regret the missed opportunity to do a bunch of stupid stuff.
@AndyD273 I get that question occasionally. It's one of my favorite yoink moments where some expects something to be one way and instead it's the exact opposite.
Yogurt and cereal breakfast, complete! Build those battery plants! Build them!
Oh, PS, I built an enormous (for me) solar farm last night. When I shut down, the construction robots were complaining that I needed another 500 accumulators to finish the blueprints I had laid out.
sighs Got an email from the kids school that all rumors of clowns in our area are unfounded and nothing to worry about. I repeat, there have been no clown sightings in our area.
And apparently there are a couple billionaires that are funding research into how to break us out of this simulated universe that we're all in. I have to wonder if they've actually thought that through. If we're in a simulated universe, and they somehow manage to break it, what's going to stop the simulators from just restoring from backup with the bug patched? Or worse, just restart it.
If you read Revelations with the right mindset, it could kind of support their theory; after all of the tribulations and all the people that are left are on God's side, there's a kind of mass world refresh to put everything back to the way it was supposed to be before the fall of man so that the faithful can see what it was supposed to be like all along, and then after that time there is a hard reset of the universe, with a new untouched heaven and earth.
We no longer have regular topic challenge events, but ocasional one-off challenges happen from time to time.
With the latest eye question I noticed the selection of alien visual system ideas we’ve had thus far, and I added a vision to a few that I recalled.
I’d like to further muse over and dis...
@TrEs-2b Billionaires trying to get scientists to look for bugs and security flaws in the reality simulation
Oh, and I'm happy to announce that the authorities in my area have announced that all rumors of clowns are unfounded and there is absolutely nothing to worry about.
While you should never approach a clown under any circumstances, remember, not all clowns want to kill you. Some are just deeply unfunny and depressing to be around. Avoid those clowns too.
I’m all for gun control, but in this time of national crisis, I make an exception. Shoot the clown first, ask questions later. Worst case scenario, we thin out the Juggalo herd.
If your father died and a clown wore his skin, walking around going ''Hey, I'm your dad'' it doesn't matter if the clown is male or female, I'm still going to piss myself
So in the Reckoners book series there is a character that really likes to use analogies, but none of them make sense until they are explained, just because the logic behind them is so out of norm. Yours is better than that at least.
Analogies are the best things ever, like analogies, which are the best things ever, like analogies, which are the best things ever, like analogies, which are the best things ever, like analogies, which are the best things ever, like analogies, which are the best things ever, like....
I went though that, the key is to just ask a lot of smaller questions as opposed to one big one, while you may look crazy for it, you will get more answers
Not really. Just about every question I have asked I have to argue over and is closed even when virtually the same type of question is asked
Those 4 questions are not different questions. They are aspects of the same question which is "what would the legal code governing these entities" look like.
And if they're not close they're not answered usually or the answers that they are given barely reflect what is being asked
I like to think that people are trying to be helpful and are just dumb, but it's hard to maintain such thinking when I see evidence to the contrary all the time.
I wonder if that lead up could be simplified a little? I don't think of myself as dumb (what dumb person would) and all the different definitions are kinda confusing and hard to follow...
@AndyD273 It could be for a less precise answer because removing things changes the context. If I remove that their brains work in x way then it isn't considered how that transfer could be reflected.
If I went on a trip and my phone could suddenly become sentient and now I owe it money I'd be pissed, probably hit it with a hammer and throw it in the ocean.
What does it owe me for all the care and electricty I fed it before it became sentient?
Also the fact that I bought it when it wasn't sentient.
I paid money, and suddenly it wants freedom. That's fine, but I'm out a lot of money.
Maybe these devices should be leased, and if they gain sentience then the company takes them back and then sends me a new one.
It seems like getting one of these things is a super risky investment.
Also, since they can't stand alone, if I unplug one will I get charged for murder?
What if the power goes out on its own. Am I in neglect?
There undoubtedly some that would be leased, like any computer or hardware, but not all. Like a person that wants to use it in a personal relationship type thing
Yes and no. The datacore is their brain and can run on its own with the battery supply, but it runs out. The main body has a powercore that is practically infinite.
Because if I fully explain something it's "too story based" or "too broad" so I have to try to explain something so compact that it loses coherence, even though this shouldn't be the case v.v
It's extremely annoying to me that this site is supposed to be about world building but forbids like half the world building experience, largely to fit into the overall SE site.
So first off, I have no idea how you'd test for sentience, especially since the question is a little vague on what that actually means, but it seems like some kind of Turing test or possibly an automated built in system would be the only way to go.
holy crap, now I want to write a short story about a court case where the jury participates in a Turing Test to see if an AI should be considered human or not
Maybe even a code phrase. So you greet it in the morning "how are you today" and normally it says "Very good, thank you master", but if it answered anything else that would show that it had become self aware
That's actually at the heart of some of what I think about this whole area of thinking. There is AI and SI. Artificial Intelligence is intelligence that you can follow from point a to point b to point z, or theoretically can if you know the entire programming or whatever
SI on the other hand somewhere along the way, no matter whether you have the full documents or not, you can't follow everything
Humans think we're SI, but we could be AI... I am automatically saying that in universe we are definitely SI, or at least enough of us are that we consider ourselves SI, but SI can come from AI
They are all kinda opinion based... which is a cop out, but still applies. What rights should they have pre? I dunno, they are property, like a cell phone, so no rights at all IMHO. What rights should they have post? I dunno, they are now alive, kinda, but they are also paid for, so maybe something like an indentured servant that has to work for a time to pay off their cost to manufacture.
I could just say that "if you past this IQ test then you are sentient" but fundamentally that would not be a good place to go because then we get into the territory of well children aren't sentient and handicapped people aren't either, but some dogs, cats, parrots, and dolphins might be... And that is a whole can of worms that I don't want to get into
Well, they'd have to have some sort of rights to be checked...which might not be a right so much as just a standard law
What rights should the former owners have? Well, they did pay for them, so they should have a way to recoup the cost. It's not like having children exactly. Either the device continues to work as a servant for a period of time, paying off their debt, or they can venture off on their own and make their own way, but have to pay a percentage of their earnings to their former owner for a while to pay it off.
@Durakken Maybe it's like a service call. Once a quarter they get taken in to have service done and get checked, and if they pass the test then things change.
That gets into slavery territory. Slaves were paid for. We didn't say that once the slaves were freed they had to repay their former masters...quite the opposite. Some people demand recompense for the labor value (money) they didn't get while slaves that their worked earned
There are also indentured servants, which are not slaves, but still have to pay back their debt
Basically, you agree to work for me for 5 years, and at the end of that time we're even and you can do whatever you want. If you don't want to work the 5 years, then you have to make other arrangements to pay me.
In my estimation I'd say that there is a chance that a computer breaks down now. Just because "breaking down" in this case means they become sentient, it doesn't mean you are entitled to any sort of refund
Another thing is that this is supposed to be a somewhat limited occurence, simply because of the issue that you bring up. I don't want a cell phone that magically becomes sentient and starts screaming for their rights.
So you answered your own question and don't need me. Like I said, the question is kind of opinion based, and at the end of the day the only opinion that matters is your own.
Regarding the breaking down, maybe a kind of "warranty" is in order
These machines are expected to get 5 years of useful "life". If it becomes sentient before that it needs to work out the remainder. If it's been at least that long then there is no futher obligation
A machine could go 20 years without becoming sentient and still function great, but if something causes to happen before the "warranty" runs out then they have to work still
In Plastic Memories they lease androids out that have a lifetime measurd in, if i remember right, something like a decade, because at that point their memories just get corrupted and they shut down or go nuts. So the company that makes and leases them collects them and reformats them right before they're likely to go nuts. And then allows the leaser to lease a new, or even the same one.
The androids act very human, but aren't considered sentient.
They however do work with the company to collect and "terminate" other androids. They have to terminate them to keep confidentiality of the leaser. It's a very sad story. If you like these types of stories. You should give it a watch.
Smallville's Lex Luthor is his character done virtually perfectly, but the only way that they could do that is by having Clark and Jonathan Kent act completely contrarily to how they'd act which is always seeing the best in someone.
Jonathan always treats Lex poorly and Clark, despite Lex almost always eventually being shown to be acting for the good of others, is influenced by his father and stops believing Lex should be trusted.
And in fact if Clark had just told him his secret it is likely that most of the events in Smallville would be simplified and Lex would have gone good rather than slowly coming to resent the lying Clark
Well, you can explain it away by fact that the show was only supposed to last 4 years and never delve into most of the area it eventually had to. The original way Clark was portrayed was accurate but later broke because keeping like that would make him stupid
However they could have fixed the issue by having Clark losing faith over time as he does, but after the events that show Lex "has a good side still" have him redouble his faith.
But then you have the issue that Lex should show some improvement to being good unless you have some counter balance every so often which doesn't really make sense
@James @dot_Sp0T and I have been playing Factorio together for a few hours. He thinks it's really fun to make fun of me, so he's incorporating my screenname into as much stuff as he can.